Advertisement

Heritage Protection Policies from the Perspective of the Social Sciences: The Case of Croatia and Non-EU South-East European Democracies

  • Saša Poljanec-BorićEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Heritage protection is a social invention established in proto-democratic countries. Through two centuries of modernisation, heritage protection has become an important public-sector activity in all Western European democracies. Transition in parallel with accession to the EU enabled the earlier integrated countries to benefit from the transfer of best practices of heritage protection from the core EU countries. Such a transfer has not taken place in belatedly integrated Croatia or in other non-integrated South-East European democracies. The mentioned deficit fundamentally threatens sane heritage protection schemes in South-East Europe. Sane heritage protection policies could be reintroduced in South-East Europe by integrating heritage urbanism principles into urban, rural and space development policies in order to couple the protection, revival and enhancement of cultural heritage at the same time. Therefore, heritage urbanism could help bridge the asymmetries in heritage protection policies on the European continent.

Keywords

Heritage urbanism Protection Policy Modern Postmodern 

References

  1. Bauman Z (1992) Intimations of postmodernity. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyme K (1998) Parties and party systems in Eastern Europe. In: Columbus FH (ed) Central and Eastern Europe in transition. Nova Science Publishers, Commack, NY, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  3. Brubaker R (1996) Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan MJ (2000) Politics as public choice. Liberty Fund Inc, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  5. Columbus FH (ed) (1998) Central and Eastern Europe in transition. Nova Science Publishers, Commack, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Conger S (1973) Social inventions. Saskatchewan Newstart, Prince AlbertGoogle Scholar
  7. Hewison R (1987) The heritage industry: Britain in the climate of decline. Metheuen Publishing Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Huntington PS (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  9. Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Malraux A (1959) Décret n° 59-889 sur la mission et l’organisation du ministère chargé des Affaires culturelles. Journal officiel du 26 juillet 1959. Assemblée Nationale, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Offe C (1991) Capitalism by democratic design—democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Soc Res 58(4):865–892Google Scholar
  12. O’Shaughnessy J, O’Shaughnessy JN (2000) Treating the nation as a brand: some neglected issues. J Macromarketing 20(1):56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pal LA (1989) Public policy analysis: an introduction. Nelson Canada, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  14. Pavlaković V (2014) Fulfilling the thousand-year old dream: strategies of symbolic nation-building in Croatia. In: Kolstø P (ed) Strategies of symbolic nation-building in South Eastern Europe. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 19–50Google Scholar
  15. Putnam R (1993) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. Am Prospect 4(13):35–42Google Scholar
  16. Republic of Croatia (1999–2017) Zakon o zaštiti i očuvanju kulturnih dobara [Act on the protection and preservation of cultural goods]Google Scholar
  17. Ritchie JRB, Crouch GI (2003) The competitive destination: a sustainable tourism perspective. CABI Publishing, Wellingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogić I (2000) Tehnika i samostalnost (Technics and self-determination). Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  19. Sassen S (2006) Territory, authority, rights: from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Shamai SH, Ilatov Z (2005) Measuring sense of place: methodological aspects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(5):467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stiglitz EJ, Rosengard KJ (2015) Economics of the public sector, 4th edn. W.W. Norton and Company, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Titmuss MR (1958) Essays on the welfare state. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. UNESCO (1972) Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Adopted at the General Conference (17th session) in Paris on 16 November 1972Google Scholar
  24. Weber M (1999) Politika kao poziv (Politik als Beruf). In: Katunarić V (ed) Vlast i politika [Politics and power]. Naklada Jesenski i Turk i Hrvatsko sociološko društvo, Zagreb, pp 161–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences Ivo PilarZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations