Advertisement

The Uses of Space Syntax Historical Research for Policy Development in Heritage Urbanism

  • Garyfalia PalaiologouEmail author
  • Sam Griffiths
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The application of space syntax methods to heritage-related questions has a long track record both in the field of space syntax research and beyond, for example in archaeology. These studies deploy the theories and methods of space syntax to explore the sociocultural dimension embedded in spatial systems of historic and archaeological significance. Space syntax analysis provides a link between the material and immaterial aspects of ‘spatial’ culture. It offers a critique of built environment typologies defined in terms of stylistic periodisation by advancing an understanding of the role of spatial configuration in the production and reproduction of space–time events. In the context of urban heritage studies, this means looking beyond the value of buildings as individual objects to buildings as elements in emergent arrangements of social space. Building on the comprehensive review of the disciplinary interface between urban history and space syntax historical studies provided by Griffiths (The use of space syntax in historical research: current practice and future possibilities, 2012), this chapter advances ‘heritage urbanism syntax’ with the aim of orientating this body of historical research towards contemporary issues of urban heritage. It identifies three kinds of heritage urbanism syntax: (1) conservation areas; (2) street scales and (3) spatial cultures in order to assist critical reflection on the application of this perspective to urban heritage contexts. The chapter highlights how a diachronic understanding of spatial cultures enables an integrative approach to heritage urbanism that situates heritage within both historical and contemporary urban landscapes. It describes the potential contribution of space syntax to inclusive bottom-up definitions of heritage and resilient heritage futures.

Keywords

Space syntax Heritage History Historical research Spatial cultures 

References

  1. Aazam Z (2005) To, around and from the centre: how the Kabah continues to integrate the society and its rituals. In: van Nes A (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international space syntax symposium, vol 1. TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, Delft, pp 310–22Google Scholar
  2. Alsalloum A (2018) Development in world heritage sites. Cathedral Communications/The Building Conservation Directory, pp 25–28. Available via Liverpool University. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3016622/1/BCD18F6_WorldHeritage.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  3. Bandarin F, van Oers R (2012) The historic urban landscape: managing heritage in an urban century. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandarin F, Van Oers R (eds) (2014) Reconnecting the city: the historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi R, Boniface P (2002) Editorial: the politics of world heritage. Int J Herit Stud 8(2):79–80Google Scholar
  6. Bogaert J, Farina A, Ceulemans R (2005) Entropy increase of fragmented habitats: a sign of human impact? Ecol. Indicators 5:207–212Google Scholar
  7. Charalambous N (2004) Spatial patterns of ethnic identity in a post global world. Traditional dwellings and settlements Working Paper Series 173, IASTE, Berkeley, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  8. Charalambous N (2007) Social and spatial patterns of cultural heritage. Paper presented at the XXI international CIPA symposium, Athens, Greece, 1–6 October 2007Google Scholar
  9. Charalambous N, Peristianis N (2002) “Cypriot boundaries” in traditional dwellings and settlements. Working Paper Series 159, IASTE, Berkeley, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiang Y-C, Deng Y (2017) City gate as key towards sustainable urban redevelopment: a case study of ancient Gungnae City within the modern city of Ji’an. Habitat Int 67:1–12Google Scholar
  11. Clark DLC (2007) Viewing the liturgy: a space syntax study of changing visibility and accessibility in the development of the Byzantine church in Jordan. World Archaeol 39(1):84–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240601148798Google Scholar
  12. Conzen MRG (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27 (2nd edn), George Philip, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Conzen MRG (1966) Historical townscapes in Britain: a problem in applied geography. In: House JW (ed) Northern geographical essays in honour of G. H. J. Daysh. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 56–78Google Scholar
  14. Dalton RC, Bafna S (2003) The syntactical image of the city: a reciprocal definition of spatial elements and spatial syntaxes. In: Proceedings of the 4th international space syntax symposium, University College London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis H, Dino B (2015) Industrial morphologies: the historic London furniture industry and the new city of production. Paper presented in 22nd ISU International Seminar on Urban Form, Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Architecture, Rome, 22–26 September 2015Google Scholar
  16. de Holanda F (2010) Brasília: Cidade Moderna, Cidade Eternal. FAU UnB, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  17. de la Torre M (2013) Values and heritage conservation. Herit Soc 6(2):155–166.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011Google Scholar
  18. Elliot DL (2008) A better way to zone: ten principles to create more livable cities. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Emerick K (2014) Conserving and managing ancient monuments: heritage, democracy, and inclusion. Heritage Matters Series 14. Boydell Press, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Esposito A, Di Pinto V (2015) Calm after the storm: the configurational approach to manage flood risk in rivercities. In: Karimi K et al (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, pp 70:1–70:16Google Scholar
  21. Ferguson TJ (1996) Historic Zuni Architecture and society: an archaeological application of space syntax. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, vol 60. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  22. Fong P (1999) The role of the monument. In: Major MD, Amorim L (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international space syntax symposium, Universidade de Brasilia, Brazilia, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  23. Fraser N (2008) Rethinking recognition: overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics. In: Olson K (ed) Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics. Verso, London, pp 129–141Google Scholar
  24. Gil J, Steinbach P (2008) From flood risk to indirect flood impact: evaluation of street network performance for effective management, response and repair. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 118:335–344Google Scholar
  25. Gospodini A (2004) Urban morphology and place identity in European cities: built heritage and innovative design. J Urban Des 9(2):225–248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480042000227834Google Scholar
  26. Griffiths S (2005) Historical space and the practice of “spatial history”: the spatio-functional transformation of Sheffield 1770–1850. In: van Nes A (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international space syntax symposium, vol 2. TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, Delft, pp 655–668Google Scholar
  27. Griffiths S (2008) Historical space and the interpretation of urban transformation: the spatiality of social and cultural change in Sheffield c1770–1910. Dissertation, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffiths S (2009) Persistence and change in the spatio-temporal description of Sheffield parish 1770–1910. In: Koch D, Marcus L, Steen J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium. TRITA-ARK- Forskningspublikation, Stockholm, pp 37:1–37:15Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths S (2011) Temporality in Hillier and Hanson’s theory of spatial description: some implications of historical research for space syntax. J Space Syntax 2(1):73–96Google Scholar
  30. Griffiths S (2012) The use of space syntax in historical research: current practice and future possibilities. In: Greene M, Reyes J, Castro A (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international space syntax symposium, PUC, Santiago, Chile, pp 8193:1–8193:26Google Scholar
  31. Griffiths S (2015) The high street as morphological event. In: Vaughan L (ed) Suburban urbanities: suburbs and the life of the high street. UCL Press, London, pp 32–50.  https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634134
  32. Griffiths S (2016) Spatial culture, processional culture and the materialities of social memory in nineteenth-century Sheffield. Distinktion: J Soc Theory 17(3):254–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2016.1183219Google Scholar
  33. Griffiths S (2017) Manufacturing innovation as spatial culture: Sheffield’s cutlery industry c.1750-1900. In: van Damme I, Blondé B, Miles A (eds) Cities and creativity from the Renaissance to the present. Routledge, London, pp 127–154Google Scholar
  34. Griffiths S, Vaughan LS (2019) Mapping spatial cultures: contributions of space syntax to research in the urban history of the 19th Century city. Urban History, Special edition on History and Mapping (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Griffiths S, von Lünen A (eds) (2016) Spatial cultures: towards a new social morphology of cities past and present. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Guzmán PC, Pereira Roders AR, Colenbrander BJF (2017) Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: an overview of global monitoring tools. Cities 60:192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.005Google Scholar
  37. Hanson J (2000) Urban transformations: a history of design ideas. Urban Des Int 5(2):97–122Google Scholar
  38. Harvey D (1973) Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Harvey DC (2001) Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. Int J Heritage Stud 7(4):319–338.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13581650120105534Google Scholar
  40. Harvey DC, Waterton E (2015) Editorial: landscapes of heritage and heritage landscapes. Landsc Res 40(8):905–910.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1086563Google Scholar
  41. Hillier B (1986) City of Alice’s dreams. Architects’ J (July):39–41Google Scholar
  42. Hillier B (1989) The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics 56(334/33):5–21Google Scholar
  43. Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Hillier B (1999) Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Des Int 4:107–127Google Scholar
  45. Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Hillier B, Iida S (2005) Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement. In: van Nes A (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international space syntax symposium, vol 1. TU Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp 553–564Google Scholar
  47. Hillier B, Leaman A (1973) The man-environment paradigm and its paradoxes. Arch Des 78(8):507–511Google Scholar
  48. Hillier B, Vaughan LS (2007) The city as one thing. Prog Plan 67(3):205–230Google Scholar
  49. Hillier B et al (1976) Space syntax. Environ Plan 3(2):147–185Google Scholar
  50. Hillier B et al (1993) Natural movement: or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ Plan B 20(1):29–66Google Scholar
  51. Jigyasu R et al (2013) Heritage and resilience: issues and opportunities for reducing disaster risks. International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), Marsh, United Kingdom. Available via issuu. https://issuu.com/emilioiannarelli/docs/heritage_and_resilience_book_for_gp. Accessed 23 May 2018
  52. Karimi K (2000) Urban conservation and spatial transformation: preserving the fragments or maintaining the ‘spatial spirit’. Urban Des Int 5:221–231Google Scholar
  53. Karimi K (2002) Iranian organic cities demystified; a unique urban experience or an organic city like others. Built Environ 28(3):187–202Google Scholar
  54. Kershen AJ, Vaughan LS (2013) There was a Priest, a Rabbi and an Imam…: an analysis of urban space and religious practice in London’s East End, 1685–2010. Mater Religion: J Objects Art Belief 9(1):10–35Google Scholar
  55. Koseoglu E, Onder DE (2009) Defining salient elements of
environment and memory
subjective and objective landmarks in Ayvalik, Turkey. In: Koch D, Marcus L, Steen J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium. TRITA-ARK- Forskningspublikation, Stockholm, pp 059:1–059:11Google Scholar
  56. Kubat et al (2012) Application of space syntax in developing—a regeneration framework for Sharjah’s heritage area. Greene M, Reyes J, Castro A (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international space syntax symposium, PUC, Santiago, Chile, pp 8040:1–8040:17Google Scholar
  57. Lees L (1994) Gentrification in London and New York: an Atlantic gap? Hous Stud 9(2):199–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039408720783Google Scholar
  58. Lefebvre H (1991 {original: 1974}) The production of space (trans: Smith DN). Blackwell, Malden MA; Oxford; CarltonGoogle Scholar
  59. Lefebvre H (1992) Éléments de rythmanalyse. Éditions Syllepse, Paris (English trans: S Elden, G Moore 2004). Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Letesson Q (2013) Minoan halls: a syntactical genealogy. Am J Archaeol 117:303–351Google Scholar
  61. Lizarralde G et al (2015) Sustainability and resilience in the built environment: the challenges of establishing a turquoise agenda in the UK. Sustain Cities Soc 15:96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.004Google Scholar
  62. Mari I, Karadima C (2005) The perceptual organisation of an axial monument—from passing to facing. In: van Nes A (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international space syntax symposium, vol 1. TU Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp 581–594Google Scholar
  63. Martínez PG (2016) Authenticity as a challenge in the transformation of Beijing’s urban heritage: the commercial gentrification of the Guozijian historic area. Cities 59:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.026Google Scholar
  64. Maureira VM, Karimi K (2017) The everyday and the post-disaster urban systems as one thing: a configurational approach to enhance the recovery and resilience of cities affected by tsunamis. In: Proceedings of the 11th international space syntax symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 3–7 July 2017, pp 91:1–91:17Google Scholar
  65. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexplored opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237Google Scholar
  66. Mürner J (2009) Preface. In: World heritage and buffer zones. World Heritage Papers 25. UNESCO, pp 11–13Google Scholar
  67. Nijman J (2007) Introduction—comparative urbanism. Urban Geogr 28(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.1.1Google Scholar
  68. Önder DE, Gigi Y (2010) Reading urban spaces by the space-syntax method: a proposal for the South Haliç Region. Cities 27:260–271Google Scholar
  69. Palaiologou G (2015) High street transactions and interactions. In: Vaughan L (ed) Suburban urbanities: suburbs and the life of the high street. UCL Press, London, pp 175–203.  https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634134
  70. Palaiologou G (2016) Character assessment: Radlett neighbourhood plan. Aldenham Parish Council, Radlett Hertfordshire. Available via Aldenham Parish Council. https://www.radlettplan.org/copy-of-why-a-plan. Accessed 23 May 2018
  71. Palaiologou G (2017) Viewpoint—urban morphology and world heritage practice. Urban Morphol 21(1):3–6Google Scholar
  72. Palaiologou G, Karimi K, Vaughan L (2016) The use of spatial network analysis in area characterisation—towards an assessment process of UNESCO historic urban landscapes. The case of Liverpool, UK. In: Paper presented in the 23rd international seminar on Urban Form, Nanjing, China, 8–10 July 2016Google Scholar
  73. Pendlebury J (2013) Conservation values, the authorised heritage discourse and the conservation-planning assemblage. Int J Heritage Stud 19(7):709–727.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.700282Google Scholar
  74. Penn A (2003) Space syntax and spatial cognition: or, why the axial line? Environ Behav 35:30–65Google Scholar
  75. Peponis J et al (1988) Social structure of space and relations of community in six Greek cities. Secretariat of Research and Technology, Ministry of Energy Industry, Research and technology, AthensGoogle Scholar
  76. Peterson A (2005) Buffer planning: historical overview. In: Kozlowski J, Peterson A (eds) Integrated buffer planning: towards sustainable development. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 79–116Google Scholar
  77. Pinho P, Oliveira V (2009a) Combining different methodological approaches to analyze the Oporto metropolitan area. In: Koch D, Marcus L, Steen J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium. TRITA-ARK- Forskningspublikation, Stockholm, pp 88:1–88:13Google Scholar
  78. Pinho P, Oliveira V (2009b) Cartographic analysis in urban morphology. Environ Plan 36:107–127Google Scholar
  79. Poulios I (2010) Moving beyond a values-based approach to heritage conservation. Conserv Manag Archaeol Sites 12(2):170–185.  https://doi.org/10.1179/175355210X12792909186539Google Scholar
  80. Psarra S (2018) The role of spatial networks in the historic urban landscape: learning from Venice in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Hist Environ: Policy & Pract 9(3–4):249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2018.1516380Google Scholar
  81. Ravankhah M et al (2017) Integration of cultural heritage into disaster risk management: challenges and opportunities for increased disaster resilience. In: Albert MT, Bandarin F, Pereira Roders A (eds) Going beyond. Heritage studies. Springer, Cham, pp 307–321Google Scholar
  82. Ripp M, Rodwell R (2015) The geography of urban heritage. Hist Environ: Policy & Pract 6(3):240–276.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2015.1100362Google Scholar
  83. Rodwell D (2003) Sustainability and the holistic approach to the conservation of historic cities. J Arch Conserv 9(1):58–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2003.10785335Google Scholar
  84. Serra M, Pinho P (2011) Dynamics of periurban spatial structures: investigating differentiated patterns of change on Oporto’s urban fringe. Environ Plan 38:359–382Google Scholar
  85. Smith L (2006) Uses of Heritage. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith ME (2011) Empirical urban theory for archaeologists. J Archaeol Method Theory 18(3):167–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9097-5Google Scholar
  87. Spence-Morrow G (2009) Analyzing the invisible—syntactic interpretation of archaeological remains through geophysical prospection. In: Koch D, Marcus L, Steen J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international space syntax symposium. TRITA-ARK- Forskningspublikation, Stockholm, pp 106:1–106:10Google Scholar
  88. Stephenson J (2008) The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 84(2):127–139Google Scholar
  89. Stöger H (2015) Roman neighbourhoods by the numbers: a space syntax view on ancient city quarters and their social life. J Space Syntax 6(1):61–80Google Scholar
  90. Stubbs MJ (2004) Heritage-sustainability: developing a methodology for the sustainable appraisal of the historic environment. Plan Pract Res 19(3):285–305.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000323229Google Scholar
  91. Talen E (2005) New urbanism and American planning: the conflict of cultures. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Taylor PD (2002) Fragmentation and cultural landscapes: tightening the relationship between human beings and the environment. Landsc Urban Plan 58(2–4):93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00212-2Google Scholar
  93. Törmä I, Griffiths S, Vaughan LS (2017) High street changeability: the effect of urban form on demolition, modification and use change in two South London suburbs. Urban Morphol 21(1):5–28Google Scholar
  94. Turner M (2009) Introduction—on buffs and buffers. World Herit Pap 25:15–18Google Scholar
  95. Tweed C, Sutherland M (2007) Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landsc Urban Plan 83(1):62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.008Google Scholar
  96. Vaughan LS (2015a) The Ethnic Marketplace as Point of Transition. In: Kershen AJ (ed) London the promised land revisited the changing face of the London migrant landscape in the early 21st century. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 35–54Google Scholar
  97. Vaughan LS et al (2015) An ecology of the suburban hedgerow, or: how high streets foster diversity over time. In: Karimi K et al (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, pp 99:1–99:19Google Scholar
  98. Vaughan LS, Sailer K (2017) The metropolitan rhythm of a “majestic religion”: an analysis of the socio-spatial configuration of synagogues in nineteenth century Whitechapel. In: Holmes C, Kershen AJ (eds) An east end legacy: essays in memory of William J. Fishman. Routledge, London, pp 188–210Google Scholar
  99. Vaughan LS, Dhanani A, Griffiths S (2013) Beyond the suburban high street cliché—a study of adaptation to change in London’s street network: 1880–2013. J Space Syntax 4(2):221–241Google Scholar
  100. Veldpaus L (2015) Historic urban landscapes: framing the integration of urban and heritage planning in multilevel governance. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  101. Veldpaus L et al (2013) Urban heritage: putting the past into the future. Hist Environ: Policy Pract 4(1):3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022Google Scholar
  102. Wang S-Y (2012) From a living city to a world heritage city: authorised heritage conservation and development and its impact on the local community. Int Dev Plan Rev 34(1).  https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2012.2Google Scholar
  103. Waterton E, Smith L (2010) The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. Int J Heritage Stud 16(1–2):4–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671Google Scholar
  104. Westin S (2011) The life and form of the city: an interview with Bill Hillier. Space Culture 14(2):227–237Google Scholar
  105. Whitehand JWR (2009) The structure of urban landscapes: strengthening research and practice. Urban Morphology 13:5–27Google Scholar
  106. Wirth L (1938) Urbanism as a way of life. Am J Sociol 46(1):1–24Google Scholar
  107. Zaninović T et al (2018) Urban landscape and spatial heritage: the case of gateway-pathways in Zagreb, Croatia. Hist Environ: Policy & Pract 9(3–4):274–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2018.1514568Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Civil and Building EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Space Syntax Laboratory, The Bartlett School of ArchitectureUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations