Advertisement

Fracture Forming Limits for Near Net Shape Forming of Sheet Metals

  • J. P. Magrinho
  • M. B. SilvaEmail author
  • P. A. F. Martins
Chapter
Part of the Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology book series (MFMT)

Abstract

The continuous innovations in sheet metallic materials lead to the need of the development of new and innovative forming methodologies. The emergence of the near net shape technologies, with the aim to create a product as close as possible to the final component, is an answer to these recent progresses. The knowledge of the formability limits of a material, that define the capacity of a material to deform permanently without failure (by necking or fracture) allows a better design of a near net shape manufacturing process. This chapter describes the methodology to determine experimentally the fracture limits by tension (fracture forming limit line—FFL) and in-plane shear (shear fracture forming limit line—SFFL). For this, commonly utilized laboratory test specimens for mechanical, fracture and formability characterization are used to determine gauge length strains at the post-testing cracked regions of the specimen and involves the determination of the gauge length strains at the cracked regions of the specimens.

Keywords

Forming limit diagram Fracture Plasticity Engineering materials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the provided support by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia of Portugal and IDMEC under LAETA-UID/EMS/50022/2013, PDTC/EMS-TEC/0626/2014 and the support by the project MODSEAT.: Modular Light-Rail Seat, P2020 LISBOA-01-0247-FEDER-017247.

References

  1. 1.
    Keeler SP (1968) Circular Grid System—a valuable aid for evaluating sheet metal formability. SAE technical paper 680092Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodwin G (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. SAE technical paper 680093Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 12004-2:2008 (2008) Metallic materials—sheet and strip—determination of forming-limit curves—Part 2: Determination of forming-limit curves in the laboratory. International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM E2218-02 (2008) Standard test method for determining forming limit curves. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vacher P, Dumoulin S, Morestin F, Mguil-Touchal S (1999) Bidimensional strain measurement using digital images. Proc IMechE Part C J Mech Eng Sci 213(8):811–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merklein M, Kuppert A, Geiger M (2010) Time dependent determination of forming limit diagrams. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan Z, Melin L, Magnusson C (1992) Application of an image processing technique in strain measurement in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 33:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martins PAF, Bay N, Tekkaya AE, Atkins AG (2014) Characterization of fracture loci in metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 83:112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 126:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wierzbicki T, Xue L (2005) On the effect of the third invariant of the stress deviator on ductile fracture. Technical Report, Impact and Crashworthiness Lab, MITGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McClintock FA (1966) Ductile fracture by hole growth in shear bands. Int J Fract Mech 2:614–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atkins AG (1997) Fracture mechanics and metalforming: damage mechanics and the local approach of yesterday and today. In: Rossmanith HP (ed) Fracture research in retrospect. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 327–350Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill R (1948) A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic materials. Proc R Soc Lond (SER A) 193:281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkins AG, Mai YW (1985) Elastic & plastic fracture. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Embury JD, LeRoy (1977) Failure maps applied to metal deformation processes. Fracture 1977, ICF4, Waterloo, Canada, 1:15–42Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gurson A (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth. I. Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 99:2–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nahshon K, Hutchinson J (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A/Solid 27:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 35:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASTM Standard E8/E8M—13 (2013) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rossard C (1976) Mise en forme des métaux et alliages. CNRS, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO Standard 120004-2 (2008) Metallic materials—sheet and strip—determination of forming-limit curves—Part 2: Determination of forming—limit curves in the laboratory, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cristino VA, Silva MB, Wong PK, Martins PAF (2017) Determining the fracture forming limits in sheet metal forming: a technical note. J Strain Anal Eng Des 52(8):467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cotterell B, Reddel JK (1977) The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture. Int J Fract 13(3):267–277Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM Standard B831-05 (2005) Standard test method for shear testing of thin aluminum alloy products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Isik K, Silva MB, Tekkaya AE, Martins PAF (2014) Formability limits by fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mat Process Technol 214:1557–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cotterell B, Lee E, Mai YW (1982) Mixed mode plane stress ductile fracture. Int J Fract 20:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Atkins AG (1996) Fracture in forming. J Mater Process Technol 56:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Magrinho
    • 1
  • M. B. Silva
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. A. F. Martins
    • 1
  1. 1.IDMEC, Instituto Superior TecnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations