Advertisement

Digester Slurry Management: The “One Health” Perspective

  • David Rodriguez-Lazaro
  • Aline Frumi Camargo
  • Thamarys Scapini
  • Charline Bonatto
  • Fernando Rosado Spilki
  • Maria Célia da Silva Lanna
  • Marta Hernández
  • Gislaine Fongaro
Chapter
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 9)

Abstract

The increasing demand for food, energy and natural resources has stimulated the use of anaerobic biodigestion, aiming at the treatment of biomass derived from anthropic activities with potential for biogas production. Digestate is rich in nutrients for soil fertilization purposes, with a potential direct impact on the safety of human, animal and environmental health, within the “One Health” scope. “One Health” deals with the set of strategies applied to human and animal medicine, combined with the conservation of the environment. This chapter will address the management and recycling of digestate in agriculture, considering chemical and microbiological contaminants (pathogens) from an One Health approach.

Keywords

Bioenergy Safety Pathogens Chemical contaminants Risk Management 

References

  1. Adeel M, Song X, Wang Y, Francis D, Yang Y (2017) Environmental impact of estrogens on human, animal and plant life: a critical review. Environ Int 99:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Badaii F, Shuhaimi-Othman M (2015) Water pollution and its impact on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli and total coliform bacteria: a study of the Semenyih River, Peninsular Malaysia. Water Qual Expos Health 7:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alburquerque JA, Fuente C, Campoy M, Carrasco L, Nájera I, Baixauli C, Caravaca F, Roldán A, Cegarra J, Bernal MP (2012) Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties. Eur J Agron 43:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Seadi T, Drosg B, Fuchs W, Rutz D, Janssen R (2013) The biogas handbook: biogas digestate quality and utilization. Science, production and applications. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, pp 267–301Google Scholar
  5. Arab G, Mccartney D (2017) Benefits to decomposition rates when using digestate as compost co-feedstock: part I—focus on physicochemical parameters. Waste Manag 68:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arab G, Razaviarani V, Sheng Z, Liu Y, Mccartney D (2017) Benefits to decomposition rates when using digestate as compost co-feedstock: part II—focus on microbial community dynamics. Waste Manag 68:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arias DM, Uggetti E, García-Galán MJ, García J (2017) Cultivation and selection of cyanobacteria in a closed photobioreactor used for secondary effluent and digestate treatment. Sci Total Environ 587–588:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arikan OA, Sikora LJ, Mulbry W, Khan SU, Rice C, Foster GD (2006) The fate and effect of oxytetracycline during the anaerobic digestion of manure from therapeutically treated calves. Process Biochem 41:1637–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbanera M, Pelosi C, Taddei AR, Cotana F (2018) Optimization of bio-oil production from solid digestate by microwave-assisted liquefaction. Energy Convers Manag 171:1263–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbosa DBP, Nabel M, Jablonwski ND (2014) Biogas-digestate as nutrient source for biomass production of Sida Hermaphrodita, Zea Mays L. and Medicago sativa L. Energy Procedia 59:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben W, Qiang Z, Pan X, Chen M (2009) Removal of veterinary antibiotics from sequencing batch reactor (SBR) pretreated swine wastewater by Fenton’s reagent. Water Res 43:4392–4402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben W, Qiang Z, Pan X, Nie Y (2011) Degradation of veterinary antibiotics by ozone in swine wastewater pretreated with sequencing batch reactor. J Environ Eng 138:272–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bertrand I, Schijven JF, Sánchez G, Wyn-Jones P, Ottoson J, Morin T, Muscillo M, Verani M, Nasser A, De Rosa Husman AM, Myrmel M, Sellwood J, Cook N, Gantzer C (2012) The impact of the temperature on the inactivation of enteric viruses in food and water: a review. J Appl Microbiol 1059–1074Google Scholar
  14. Bloem E, Albihn A, Elving J, Hermann L, Lehmann L, Sarvi M, Schaaf T, Schick J, Turtola E, Ylivainio K (2017) Contamination of organic nutrient sources with potentially toxic elements, antibiotics and pathogen microorganisms in relation to P fertilizer potential and treatment options for the production of sustainable fertilizers: a review. Sci Total Environ 607–608:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolzonella D, Fatone F, Gottardo M, Frison N (2018) Nutrients recovery from anaerobic digestate of agro-waste: techno-economic assessment of full scale applications. J Environ Manage 216:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brazil. Law 12,305, of August 2, 2010 (2010) Establishes the national solid waste politics. RJ, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  17. Bustamante MA, Alburquerque JA, Restrepo AP, Fuente C, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2012) Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass Bioenergy 43:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bustamante MA, Restrepo AP, Alburquerque JA, Pérez-Murcia MD, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2013) Recycling of anaerobic digestates by composting: effect of the bulking agent used. J Clean Prod 47:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Outbreak of Escherichia coli O104: H4 infections associated with sprout consumption—Europe and North America. 62:1029–1031Google Scholar
  20. Chen WR, Huang CH (2010) Adsorption and transformation of tetracycline antibiotics with aluminium oxide. Chemosphere 79:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Mathava KS, Du B, Wei Q, Wei D (2018a) Problematic effects of antibiotics on anaerobic treatment of swine wastewater. Biores Technol 263:642–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Liu YW, Zhou JL, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Bui XT, Zhang XB (2018b) Bioprocessing for elimination antibiotics and hormones from swine wastewater. Sci Total Environ 621:1664–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiumenti A, Borso F, Chiumenti R, Teri F, Segantin P (2013) Treatment of digestate from a co-digestion biogas plant by means of vacuum evaporation: tests for process optimization and environmental sustainability. Waste Manag 33:1339–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chowdhury F, Langenkämper G, Grote M (2016) Studies on uptake and distribution of antibiotics in red cabbage. J Consum Prot Food Saf 11:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cuffie VI, Díaz AMC, Silvera A, Sabini LI, Cordoba PA (2016) Comparison of antigenic dominants of VP7 in G9 and G1 rotavirus strains circulating in La Rioja, Argentina, with the vaccine strains. Viral Immunol 29(6):367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Czekala W, Bartnikowska S, Dach J, Janczak D, Koz K, Buga A, Lewicki A, Cie M, Smurzy A (2018) The energy value and economic efficiency of solid biofuels produced from digestate and sawdust. Energy 159:1118–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Cazes M, Abejón R, Belleville MP, Sanchez-Marcano J (2014) Membrane bioprocesses for pharmaceutical micropollutant removal from waters. Membranes 4:692–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Delahoy MJ, Wodnik B, McAliley L, Penakalapati G, Swarthout J, Freeman MC, Levy K (2018) Pathogens transmitted in animal feces in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Hyg Environ Health 221(4):661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ebele AJ, Abou-Elwafa Abdallah M, Harrad S (2017) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerg Contam 3:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States (FAO) (2015) Status report on antimicrobial resistance. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  31. Franchino M, Tigini V, Cristina G, Mussat R, Bona F (2016) Microalgae treatment removes nutrients and reduces ecotoxicity of diluted piggery digestate. Sci Total Environ 569–570:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haese D, Silva BAN (2004) Antibiotics as growth promoters in monogastric. Electron J Nutritime 1(1):7–19Google Scholar
  33. Heldt FH, Staggmeier R, Gularte JS, Demoliner M, Henzel A, Spilki FR (2016) Hepatitis E virus in surface water, sediments, and pork products marketed in Southern Brazil. Food Environ Virol 8(3):200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirsch R, Ternes T, Haberer K, Kratz KL (1999) Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ 225:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodgson CJ, Oliver DM, Fish RD, Bulmer NM, Heathwaite AL, Winter M, Chadwick DR (2016) Seasonal persistence of faecal indicator organisms in soil following dairy slurry application to land by surface broadcasting and shallow injection. J Environ Manage 183:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J (2015) Manure-based biogas fermentation residues—friend or foe of soil fertility. Soil Biol Biochem 84:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jechalke S, Heuer H, Siemers J, Amelung W, Smalla K (2014) Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol 22:536–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kemper N (2008) Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol Ind 8:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knoop C, Dornack C, Raab T (2018) Effect of drying, composting and subsequent impurity removal by sieving on the properties of digestates from municipal organic waste. Waste Manag 72:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koszel M, Lorencowicz E (2015) Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 7:119–124Google Scholar
  41. Kummerer K (2009) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment—a review—part I. Chemosphere 75:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leal DAG, Ramos APD, Souza DSM, Durigan M, Greinert-Goulart JA, Moresco V, Amstutz RC, Micoli AH, Cantusio Neto R, Barardi CRM, Franco RMB (2013) Sanitary quality of edible bivalve mollusks in southeastern Brazil using an U.V. based depuration system. Ocean Coast Manag 72:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ledda C, Schievano A, Salati S, Adani F, Celoria V (2013) Nitrogen and water recovery from animal slurries by a new integrated ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and cold stripping process: a case study. Water Res 47:6157–6166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li Y, Liu H, Li G, Luo W, Sun Y (2018) Manure digestate storage under different conditions: chemical characteristics and contaminant residuals. Sci Total Environ 639:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Limoli A, Langone M, Andreottola G (2016) Ammonia removal from raw manure digestate by means of a turbulent mixing stripping process. J Environ Manage 176:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu ZH, Kanjo Y, Mizutani S (2009) Removal mechanisms for endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in wastewater treatment-physical means, biodegradation, and chemical advanced oxidation: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:731–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manyi-Loh CE, Mamphweli SN, Meyer EL, Makaka G, Simon M, Okoh AI (2016) An overview of the control of bacterial pathogens in cattle manure. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(9):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meng XJ (2010) Hepatitis E virus: animal reservoirs and zoonotic risk. Vet Microbiol 140:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Musatti A, Ficara E, Mapelli C, Sambusiti C, Rollini M (2017) Use of solid digestate for lignocellulolytic enzymes production through submerged fungal fermentation. J Environ Manage 199:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nguyen-Viet H, Pham-Duc P, Nguyen V, Tanner M, Odermatt P, Vu-Van T, Minh HV, Zurbrügg C, Schelling E, Zinsstag J (2015) A one health perspective for integrated human and animal sanitation and nutrient recycling. In: Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Waltner-Toews D, Whittaker M, Tanner M (eds) One health. The theory and practice of integrated health approaches. Cabi, Boston, pp 96–107Google Scholar
  51. Nkoa R (2013) Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:473–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Odlare M, Pell M (2009) Effect of wood fly ash and compost on nitrification and denitrification in agricultural soil. Appl Energy 86:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Opatokun SA, Yousef LF, Strezov V (2017) Agronomic assessment of pyrolysed food waste digestate for sandy soil management. J Environ Manage 187:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ortner M, Rachbauer L, Somitsch W, Fuchs W (2014) Can bioavailability of trace nutrients be measured in anaerobic digestion? Appl Energy 126:190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park W, Park B, Ahn H, Lee J, Park S, Song C, Lee S, Yoo H, Choi I (2016) Hepatitis E virus as an emerging zoonotic pathogen. J Vet Sci 17(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pell M, Stenberg B, Torstensson L (1998) Potential denitrification and nitrification tests for evaluation of pesticide effects in soil. Ambio 27:24–28Google Scholar
  57. Peng W, Pivato A, Cristina M, Raga R (2018) Digestate application in landfill bioreactors to remove nitrogen of old landfill leachate. Waste Manag 74:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pivato A, Vanin S, Raga R, Cristina M, Barausse A, Rieple A, Laurent A, Cossu R (2016) Use of digestate from a decentralized on-farm biogas plant as fertilizer in soils: an ecotoxicological study for future indicators in risk and life cycle assessment. Waste Manag 49:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pulvirenti A, Ronga D, Zaghi M, Rita A, Mannella L, Pecchioni N (2015) Pelleting is a successful method to eliminate the presence of Clostridium spp. from the digestate of biogas plants. Biomass Bioenergy 81:479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putra EK, Pranowo R, Sunarso J, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Performance of activated carbon and bentonite for adsorption of amoxicillin from wastewater: mechanism, isotherms and kinetics. Water Res 43:2419–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Qiang Z, Macauley JJ, Mormile MR, Surampalli R, Adams CD (2006) Treatment of antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacteria in swine wastewater with free chlorine. J Agric Food Chem 54:8144–8154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ratsak C, Guhl B, Zühlke S, Delschen T (2013) Veterinary antibiotic residues in manure and digestates in Northrhein-Westfalia. Environ Sci Eur 25:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Risberg K, Cederlund H, Pell M, Arthurson V, Schnürer A (2017) Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure—chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste Manag 61:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riva C, Orzi V, Carozzi M, Acutis M, Boccasile G, Lonati S, Tambone F, Imporzano GD, Adani F (2016) Short-term experiments in using digestate products as substitutes for mineral (N) fertilizer: agronomic performance, odours, and ammonia emission impacts. Sci Total Environ 547:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ronquillo MG, Hernandez JCA (2017) Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: review of impact and analytical methods. Food ControlGoogle Scholar
  66. Sawyer C, Mccarty P, Parkin G (2002) Basic concepts from physical chemistry. In: Chemistry for environmental engineering and science. McGraw-Hill Science, USA, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Semenov AV, Van Bruggen AH, Van Overbeek L, Termorshuizen AJ, Semenov AM (2007) Influence of temperature fluctuations on Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in cow manure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60(3):419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sidhu J, Gibbs RA, Ho GE, Unkovich I (2001) The role of indigenous microorganisms in suppression of salmonella regrowth in composted biosolids. Water Res 35(4):913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Solé-bundó M, Cucina M, Gigliotti G, Garfí M, Ferrer I (2017) Assessing the agricultural reuse of the digestate from microalgae anaerobic digestion and co-digestion with sewage sludge. Sci Total Environ 586:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Speltini A, Sturini M, Maraschi F, Profumo A, Albini A (2011) Analytical methods for the determination of fluoroquinolones in solid environmental matrices. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:1337–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spielmeyer A, Ahlborn J, Hamscher G (2014) Simultaneous determination of 14 sulfonamides and tetracyclines in biogas plants by liquid-liquid-extraction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2513–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Staggemeier R, Bortoluzzi M, Heck TMS, Luz RB, Fabres RB, Soliman MC, Rigotto C, Baldasso NA, Spilki FR, Esteves S (2015) Animal and human enteric viruses in water and sediment samples from dairy farms. Agric Water Manag 152:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Suzuki T, Hasebe A (2017) A provisional complete genome-based genotyping system for rotavirus species C from terrestrial mammals. Microbiol Soc J 98:2647–2662Google Scholar
  74. Wang J, Lin H, Sun W, Xia Y, Ma J, Fu J, Zhang Z, Wu H, Qian M (2016) Variations in the fate and biological effects of sulfamethoxazole, norfloxacin and doxycycline in different vegetable–soil systems following manure application. J Hazard Mater 304:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wei Y, Hong J, Ji W (2018) Thermal characterization and pyrolysis of digestate for phenol production. Fuel 232:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yan Y, Zhang L, Feng L, Sun D, Dang Y (2018) Comparison of varying operating parameters on heavy metals ecological risk during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and corn stover. Biores Technol 247:660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang S, Xu J, Wang Z, Bao L, Zeng EY (2017) Cultivation of oleaginous microalgae for removal of nutrients and heavy metals from biogas digestates. J Clean Prod 164:793–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. You Y, Silbergeld EK (2014) Learning from agriculture: understanding low-dose antimicrobials as drivers of resistome expansion. Front Microbiol 5:1–10Google Scholar
  79. Zhang W, Zhang L, Li A (2015) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste by trace metal elements supplementation and reduced metals dosage by green chelating agent [S, S]-EDDS via improving metals bioavailability. Water Res 84:266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Rodriguez-Lazaro
    • 1
  • Aline Frumi Camargo
    • 2
  • Thamarys Scapini
    • 2
  • Charline Bonatto
    • 3
  • Fernando Rosado Spilki
    • 4
  • Maria Célia da Silva Lanna
    • 5
  • Marta Hernández
    • 6
  • Gislaine Fongaro
    • 2
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Microbiology Section, Department of Biotechnology and Food ScienceUniversidad de BurgosBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Laboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocess, Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyFederal University of Fronteira SulErechimBrazil
  3. 3.Postgraduate Program in Chemical EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  4. 4.Institute of Health Sciences, Feevale UniversityNovo HamburgoBrazil
  5. 5.Laboratory of Microbiology and Technologic Bioprospection (LMBT)Federal University of Ouro PretoMinas GeraisBrazil
  6. 6.Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y LeónValladolidSpain
  7. 7.Laboratory of Applied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (MIP)Federal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  8. 8.Environmental EngineeringUniversidade do ContestadoConcórdiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations