Advertisement

Creating and Sustaining Online Problem Solving Forums: Two Perspectives

  • Boris KoichuEmail author
  • Nelly Keller
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to present and theorize our more successful and less successful attempts to enhance long-term collaborative problem solving in high school, by means of online problem-solving forums. We focus on two classroom communities and their interactions, during two school years, with an additional community, a research group that initiated the use of the forums. In one of the classroom communities, online problem solving has eventually become a routine practice and a valuable addition to classroom problem solving. In another classroom community, the forum did not become active despite considerable effort made, but enduring attempts to activate it led to enhancement of student-student interactions in the classroom. All three communities (i.e., two classroom communities and the research group) gradually developed. Taking the Diffusion of Innovations perspective, we characterize stages of the development and identify its main agents. Taking the Communities of Practice perspective, we characterize each community and illustrate boundary interactions between them as a driving force for their development.

Keywords

Mathematical problem solving Online problem-solving forums Mathematics classroom Communities of practice Diffusion of innovation Narrative inquiry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1593/13; PI Koichu). We are grateful to all the participants, and especially to the research group of the first year of the project: Yaniv Biton, Igor Kontorovich, Royi Lachmy, Ofer Marmur and Alik Palatnik.

References

  1. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clandinin, D., & Caine, V. (2008). Narrative inquiry. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 542–545). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, K., James, A., & Montelle, C. (2014). We definitely wouldn’t be able to solve it all by ourselves, but together…: Group synergy in tertiary students’ problem-solving practices. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Fraivert, D. (2016). Discovering new geometric properties by spiral inductive deductive investigation. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 16(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Keller, N., & Koichu, B. (2017). A dialogue about integrating a class environment and an online environment in mathematics education. In B. B. Schwarz, H. Rosenberg, & C. S. C. Asterhan (Eds.), Breaking down barriers? Teachers, students and social network sites (pp. 156–180). Tel Aviv, Israel: MOFET (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  8. Koichu, B. (2015a).Towards a confluence framework of problem solving in educational contexts. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2668–2674). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.Google Scholar
  9. Koichu, B. (2015b). Problem solving and choice-based pedagogies. In F. M. Singer, F. Toader, & C. Voica (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (pp. 68–73). Sinaia, Romania. Available at http://mcg-9.net/pdfuri/MCG-9-Conference-proceedings.pdf.
  10. Koichu, B. (2018). Mathematical problem solving in choice-affluent environments. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu, (Eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematics Education (pp. 307–324). Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2006). Patterns of middle school students’ heuristic behaviors in solving seemingly familiar problems. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 457–464). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.Google Scholar
  12. Koichu, B., & Keller, N. (2017). Implementation enterprise through the lens of a theory of diffusion of innovations: A case of online problem-solving forums. In The 10th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Institute of Education, Dublin City University, Ireland. Available at https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0562.pdf.
  13. Lachmy, R., Amir, Y., Azmon, S., Elran, Y., & Kesner, M. (2012). Pythagoras’ school revived: Collaborative learning of mathematics supported by learning management systems in secondary school. In L. Gómez Chova, I. Candel Torres, & A. López Martínez (Eds.), EDULEARN12 Proceedings: 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 5342–5349). Barcelona, Spain: International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED).Google Scholar
  14. Lachmy, R., & Koichu, B. (2014). The interplay of empirical and deductive reasoning in proving “if” and “only if” statements in a Dynamic Geometry environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 3(4), 305–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin, G. (2011). Designing a web-based collaborative-learning module for statistical problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building in mathematics: Supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (Ed.). (2018). K–12 mathematics education in israel. issues and innovations. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  21. Nason, R., & Woodruff, E. (2003). Fostering authentic, sustained, and progressive mathematical knowledge-building activity in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) communities. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22(4), 345–363.Google Scholar
  22. Palatnik, A. (2016). Middle-school students’ learning through long-term mathematical research projects (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Technion—Israel Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  23. Palatnik, A., & Koichu, B. (2015). Exploring insight: Focus on shifts of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 9–14.Google Scholar
  24. Palatnik, A., & Koichu, B. (2017). Sense making in the context of algebraic activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schwarz, B., & Asterhan, C. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharygin, I. F., & Gordin, R. K. (2001). Collection of problem in geometry. 5000 problems with solutions. [Sbornik zadach po geometrii. 5000 zadach s otvetami]. Moscow: Astrel (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Solomon, Y., Eriksen, E., Smestad, B., Rodal, C., & Bjerke, A. (2017). Prospective teachers navigating intersecting communities of practice: Early school placement. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stahl, G., & Rosé, C. P. (2011). Group cognition in online teams. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  31. Stein, M., Engle, R., Smith, M., & Hughes, E. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond “show and tell”. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tarja-Ritta, H., & Järvelä, S. (2005). Students’ activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). London: The Open University in Association with Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wentworth, B. (2009). Argumentation in an online mathematics course (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minnesota. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.952.8328&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  36. Wit, A. (2007). Interacting in groups. In O. Hargie (Ed.), The handbook of communication skills (3rd ed., pp. 383–402). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Technion - Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations