Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Krzysztof JaskułowskiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the main conclusions, implications and limitations of the book. It primarily focuses on the cultural character of Polish nationalism. It additionally discusses the specificity of Polish Islamophobia and its relationship with anti-Tsiganism. It also considers the possibility of building humanitarian attitudes towards refugees, and demonstrates the book’s practical implications.

Keywords

Refugees Migration Muslims Islamophobia Poland Nationalism 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1979). The origins of totalitarianism. San Diego, New York, and London: A Harvest Book.Google Scholar
  2. Balogun, B. (2017). Polish lebensraum: The colonial ambition to expand on racial terms. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1392028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobako, M. (2017). Islamofobia jako technologia władzy. Studium z antropologii politycznej [Islamophobia as a technology of power: A study in political anthropology]. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
  4. Brubaker, R. (2017). Between nationalism and civilizationism: The European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40, 1191–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gawlewicz, A., & Narkowicz, K. (2015). Islamophobia on the move: Circulation of anti-Muslim prejudice between Poland and the UK. In Y. Suleiman (Ed.), Muslim in the UK and Europe (pp. 90–100). Cambridge: Centre of Islamic Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  7. Kapralski, S. (2016). The evolution of anti-Gypsism in Poland: From ritual scapegoat to surrogate victims to racial hate speech? Polish Sociological Review, 1, 101–117.Google Scholar
  8. Kende, A., Hadarics, M., & Lášticová, B. (2017). Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klaver, J., Piłat, A., Potkańska, D., & Sitko, A. (2016). Local responses to the refugee crisis: Reception and integration. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.Google Scholar
  10. Narkowicz, K. (2018). ‘Refugees not welcome here’: State, church and civil society responses to the refugee crisis in Poland. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9287-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nowicka, M. (2018). “I don’t mean to sound racist but…”. Transforming racism in transnational Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 5, 824–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pędziwiatr, K. (2017). Islamophobia in Poland. National report 2016. In E. Bayraklı & F. Hafez (Eds.), European Islamophobia report 2016 (pp. 413–438). Istanbul: SETA.Google Scholar
  13. Puggioni, R. (2016). Rethinking international protection: The sovereign, the state, the refugee. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Said, E. (1985). Orientalism reconsidered. Cultural Critique, 1, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesSWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations