In this chapter, I assess the definitions of CI in the literature and synthesize them to propose a new definition of CP that incorporates the much-heated discussion about the effects of CP on the epistemic role of perception. I distinguish this definition from the other definitions that I had examined underlying at the same time the commonalities with them. Then, I propose to approach CP by factoring in the epistemic role of perception in justifying perceptual beliefs. This means that one should determine and assess the epistemic role of each stage of visual processing separately, in view of the different roles that the two stages play in perception and in view of the fact that cognition affects early and late vision differently. In view of the two threads that exist in definition of CP, one imposing the demand that for a perceptual process to be CP it must be directly affected by cognition, and the other imposing the demand that for a perceptual process to be CP cognition should affect in an interesting way its epistemic role, I discuss the relation between these two conditions. Finally, in view of my thesis that late vision is CP because cognitive states affect hitherto purely perceptual processes, I propose a way in which states with cognitive contents that are symbolically structured could affect states with purely iconic or analog contents.
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–609.Google Scholar
- Fazekas, P., & Nanay, B. (2017). Pre-cueing effects: Attention or mental imagery? Frontiers in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00222.
- Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965.
- Fodor, J. (2007). The revenge of the given. In B. P. McLaughlin & J. Cohen (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (2015). Minds Without Meanings: An Essay on the Content of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gross, S. (2017). Cognitive penetration and attention. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00221.
- Gross, S., Chaisilprungraung, T., Kaplan, E., Menendez, J., & Flombaum, J. (2014). Problems for the purported cognitive penetration of perceptual color experience and Macpherson’s proposed mechanism. In E. Machery & J. Prinz (Eds.), Thought and Perception (pp. 1–30). Lawrence, KS: New Prairie Press.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, G. (2002). Perception as unconscious inference. In D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld (Eds.), Perception and the Physical World: Psychological and Philosophical Issues in Perception. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2005). A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1, 631–637.Google Scholar
- Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Marchi, F. (2016). Attention and cognitive penetrability: The epistemic consequences of attention as a form of metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.2016/j.concog.2016.06.014.
- Newen, A., & Vetter, P. (2016). Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account. Consciousness and Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.005.
- Nobre, A. C., Rohenkhol, G., & Stokes, M. G. (2012). Nervous anticipation: Top-down biasing across space and time. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Norretranders, T. (1998). The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341–365.Google Scholar
- Raftopoulos, A. (2011, November 30). Late vision: Its processes and epistemic status. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 382. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00382.
- Retzeperis, I., Nikolaev, A. E., Kiper, D., & van Leeuwen, C. (2014). Distributed processing of color and form in the visual cortex. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00932.
- Siegel, S. (2012). The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S. (2013b). Can selection effects influence the rational role of experience? In T. Gelder (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology (Vol. 4, pp. 240–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sligte, I. G., Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, A. F. (2010, October). Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 175.Google Scholar
- Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114.Google Scholar