Advertisement

REWAS 2019 pp 47-49 | Cite as

Sustainability as a Lens for Traditional Material Science Curriculums

  • Gabrielle GaustadEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The theoretical and methodological foundations of the sciences and technologies are essential to the removal of barriers to achieving sustainable systems. The teachings of these concepts still lie in traditional academic disciplines such as engineering, science, and mathematics. This structure can often manifest significant barriers to progress in tackling challenging sustainability issues due to an absence of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary, systems approach. This work will explore approaches for using current sustainability issues and problems to introduce both systems thinking and traditional material science discipline specific learning objectives to the classroom. Specific examples will be illustrated for a diverse set of courses and curriculum. Results show such an approach can improve recruitment and retention results in addition to improved teaching outcomes.

Keywords

Pedagogy Engineering Education ABET 

References

  1. 1.
    Ashby MF, Shercliff H, Cebon D (2013) Materials: engineering, science, processing and design. Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connor A, Sosa R, Jackson AG, Marks S (2017) Problem solving at the edge of disciplines. In: Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education. IGI Global, pp 212–234Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faris J, Kolker E, Szalay A, Bradlow L, Deelman E, Feng W, Qiu J, Russell D, Stewart E, Kolker E (2011) Communication and data-intensive science in the beginning of the 21st century. OMICS J Integr Biol 15(4):213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gipson KG, Prins RJ (2015) Materials and mechanics: a multidisciplinary course incorporating. In: Handbook of research on recent developments in materials science and corrosion engineering education, vol 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glasgow RE, Emmons KM (2007) How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health 28:413–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunister E, Ozturk F, Simmons RJ, Deveci T (2015) Innovative instructional strategies for teaching materials science in engineering. In: Handbook of research on recent developments in materials science and corrosion engineering education, vol 100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hussey K, Pittock J, Dovers S (2015) Justifying, extending and applying “nexus” thinking in the quest for sustainable development. In: Climate, energy and waterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mainali B, Petrolito J, Russell J, Ionescu D, Al Abadi H (2015) Integrating sustainable engineering principles in material science engineering education. In: Handbook of research on recent developments in materials science and corrosion engineering education, vol 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Passow HJ (2012) Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? J Eng Educ 101(1):95–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stringer L, Quinn C, Berman R, Le H, Msuya F, Orchard S, Pezzuti J (2014) Combining nexus and resilience thinking in a novel framework to enable more equitable and just outcomesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Krauss MK, Harremoës P (2001) 11. MTBE in petrol as a substitute for lead. In: Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000, vol 110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inamori School of EngineeringAlfred UniversityAlfredUSA

Personalised recommendations