An Evaluation of the National Open Government Data (OGD) Portal of the United Arab Emirates

  • Stuti SaxenaEmail author


The purport of this chapter is to evaluate the national open government data (OGD) portal of the United Arab Emirates ( OGD relates to the provision of datasets by the government bodies via dedicated online portals in a bid to promote citizen participation, administrative transparency and administrative efficiency. Hitherto, the datasets were stored in government repositories and remained inaccessible to the public. It is anticipated that the published datasets might be useful for the stakeholders (citizens, private sector professionals, professionals from non-governmental organizations, software developers, etc.) for deriving value out of the same. Specifically, the chapter invokes two frameworks—the usability framework (Machova, Hub, & Lnenicka, Aslib Journal of Information Management., 2018), underlining the need for maintaining the quality of the datasets published online, and the website quality framework (Sorum, Andersen, & Clemmensen, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(3), 322–341, 2013), underlining the need to maintain the user-friendliness tenet of a government website. The findings from the study suggest that there are several hindrances as far as the re-use of datasets by a large section of stakeholders is concerned.


Open government data (OGD) Open data Government United Arab Emirates (UAE) 


  1. Afful-Dadzie, E., & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2017). Open government data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2014). A platform for closing the open data feedback loop based on Web 2.0 functionality. eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government, 6(1), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., & Loukis, E. (2016). A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1/2), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawes, S. D., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huijboom, N., & Van den Broek, T. A. (2011). Open data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12(1), 4–16.Google Scholar
  7. Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., & Shilton, K. (2012). Information policy and social media: Framing government—Citizen Web 2.0 interactions. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 11–25). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jung, K., & Park, H. W. (2015). A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea’s “Open Public Data” policy. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2011a). Open government data: A stage model. Paper presented at International Conference on Electronic Government, 28 August–2 September 2011, Springer, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2011b). A classification scheme for open government data: Towards linking decentralised data. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 266–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of Open Data: A case study of the Chicago Open Data Project. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kassen, M. (2017). Open data in Kazakhstan: Incentives, implementation and challenges. Information Technology & People, 30(2), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Machova, R., Hub, M., & Lnenicka, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders’ perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, C. (2014). Barriers to the open government data agenda: Taking a multi-level perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mergel, I. (2015). Open collaboration in the public sector: The case of social coding on GitHub. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mpinganjira, M. (2015). Use of e-government services: The role of trust. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nugroho, R. P., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & de Jong, M. (2015). A comparison of national open data policies: Lessons learned. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(3), 286–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothenberg, J. (2012). Case study international benchmark: Towards a better supply and distribution process for open data. Retrieved from Logica Business Consulting, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Saxena, S. (2016). Integrating Open and Big Data via ‘e-Oman’: Prospects and issues. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 9(4), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saxena, S. (2017a). Significance of open government data in the GCC countries. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 19(3), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saxena, S. (2017b). Prospects of open government data (OGD) in facilitating the economic diversification of GCC region. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saxena, S. (2018). Open government data (OGD) in six Middle East countries: An evaluation of the national open data portals. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(4), 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saxena, S., & Janssen, M. (2017). Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through the UTAUT framework. Foresight, 19(4), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sieber, R. E., & Johnson, P. A. (2015). Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorum, H., Andersen, K. N., & Clemmensen, T. (2013). Website quality in government: Exploring the webmaster’s perception and explanation of website quality. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(3), 322–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 22.
  28. Verhulst, S., & Young, A. (2016). Open Data impact, when demand and supply meet: Key finding of the open data. Impact case studies. Retrieved from
  29. Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rosch, M. (2017). Open government and citizen participation: An empirical analysis of citizen expectancy towards open government data. International Review of Administrative Sciences. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central University of HaryanaMohindergarhIndia

Personalised recommendations