Advertisement

Tool Support for Designing Innovative Sustainable Business Models

  • Ralf KnackstedtEmail author
  • Sebastian Bräuer
  • Thorsten Schoormann
Chapter

Abstract

Successful innovation is the key to generate novel business model ideas. Current real-world challenges such as the deterioration of the natural environment require practitioners and academics alike to identify new ways of acting and behaving. Living the ‘virtues of German engineering’ in information systems research, we aim at supporting business model innovation and solving imminent challenges by developing purposeful IT artifacts. In this article, we report on three ongoing research projects and emerging software prototypes that assist business model innovation. First, to foster creativity during the development of new business model ideas and to increase rigorousness in Design Thinking, we implemented a prototype that enables a structured, traceable, and collaborative documentation of Design Thinking projects and recommends task-specific creativity techniques. Second, to support the construction and the analysis of business models, we present the GBM Editor that especially focuses on the reflection of sustainability. Third, to detail the business model, we illustrate the Cooperation Manager that allow planning service networks by focusing on inter-organizational tasks and information exchanges. For demonstrating the applicability and the dependencies of these tools, we draw on an illustrative scenario of electric vehicle battery second use.

Keywords

‘Gestaltungsorientierte Forschung’ Business model development Software prototypes Electric vehicle battery second use 

References

  1. Balcombe, P., Rigby, D., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK. Applied Energy, 130(18), 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, J. (2008). Ein Plädoyer für die gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. In R. Jung, & T. Myrach (Eds.), Quo vadis Wirtschaftsinformatik? (pp. 3–21). Wiesbaden: Gabler.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9855-2_1.
  3. Bräuer, S. (2018). Electric vehicle battery second use-future trade, business models, and information systems design. University of Münster.Google Scholar
  4. Bräuer, S., Monhof, M., Klör, B., Plenter, F., Siemen, C., & Beverungen, D. (2016). Residential energy storage from repurposed electric vehicle batteries-market overview and development of a service-centered business model. In 2016 IEEE 18th Conference on Business Informatics. Paris (FR).Google Scholar
  5. Bräuer, S., Scholta, H., Strotmeier, M., & Knackstedt, R. (2017). Entwicklung und Anwendung der Cooperation Experience-Modellierungsmethode. In J. Becker, T. Bernhold, R. Knackstedt, & M. Matzner (Eds.), Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften (pp. 109–157). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In W. Uebernickel & F. Brenner (Eds.), Design thinking for innovation (pp. 3–21). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 84–92.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York City, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brzeski, C., & Burk, I. (2017). Sechs Millionen Elektroautos im Jahr 2030–Illusion oder Realität?. Frankfurt am Main: ING DiBa.Google Scholar
  11. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casals, L. C., García, B. A., Aguesse, F., & Iturrondobeitia, A. (2017). Second life of electric vehicle batteries: Relation between materials degradation and environmental impact. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(1), 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. d.School. (2018). An introduction to design thinking-process guide.Google Scholar
  14. Design Council. (2018). The design process: What is the double diamond? Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diam-ond.
  15. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2009). PAS 1094:2009-12 - Hybride Wertschöpfung - Integration von Sach- und Dienstleistung. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2011). DIN EN 50272-1:2011-10; VDE 0510-1:2011-10. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  17. Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durugbo, C., Tiwari, A., & Alcock, J. R. (2011). A review of information flow diagrammatic models for product-service systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(9–12), 1193–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engberts, F., & Borgman, H. (2018). Application of design thinking for service innovation: Current practices, expectations and adoption barriers. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island (HI).Google Scholar
  20. Fehér, P., & Varga, K. (2017). Using design thinking to identify banking digitization opportunities–snapshot of the hungarian banking system. In 30th Bled eConference Digital Transformation–From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives. Bled, SI.Google Scholar
  21. Figgener, J., Haberschusz, D., Kairies, K.-P., Wessels, O., Tepe, B., & Sauer, D. U. (2018). Wissenschaftliches Mess- und Evaluierungsprogramm Solarstormspeicher 2.0: Jahresbericht 2018. Aachen: Institut für Stromrichtertechnik und Elektrische Antriebe der RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
  22. Hasso-Plattner-Institut. (2018). Die sechs Schritte im Design Thinking Innovationsprozess. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://hpi.de/school-of-design-thinking/design-thinking/hintergrund/design-thinking-prozess.html.
  23. Hofer, J., Schoormann, T., Kortum, J., & Knackstedt, R. (2019). ,,Ich weiß was ihr letzte Sitzung getan habt” – Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Softwarewerkzeuges zur Dokumentation von Design Thinking-Projekten. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  24. John, T. (2016). Supporting business model idea generation through machine-generated ideas: A design theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Dublin (IE).Google Scholar
  25. Junglas, I., Niehaves, B., Spiekermann, S., Stahl, B. C., Weitzel, T., Winter, R., et al. (2011). The inflation of academic intellectual capital: The case for design dcience research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lattemann, C., Siemon, D., Dorawa, D., & Redlich, B. (2017). Digitization of the design thinking process solving problems with geographically dispersed teams. In Design, user experience, and usability: theory, methodology, and management (pp. 71–88). Vancouver, CA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Freudenreich, B., Schaltegger, S., Saviuc, I., & Stock, M. (2017). Sustainability-oriented business model assessment—A conceptual foundation. In E. G. Carayannis & S. Sindakis (Eds.), Analytics, innovation, and excellence-driven enterprise sustainability (pp. 169–206). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Menning, A., Beyhl, T., Giese, H., Weinberg, U., & Nicolai, C. (2014). Introducing the LogCal: Template-based documentation support for educational design thinking projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. Twente (NL).Google Scholar
  31. Müller-Wienbergen, F., Müller, O., Seidel, S., & Becker, J. (2011). Leaving the beaten tracks in creative work–A design theory for systems that support convergent and divergent thinking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(11), 714–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., … Sinz, E. J. (2011). Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.Google Scholar
  35. Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patricio, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015). Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. Journal of Service Research, 18(2), 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plenter, F., Menne, S., Hindersmann, C., Bräuer, S., Voscort, J., & Mittmann, R. (2019). Szenarien und Geschäftsmodelle für die Vermarktung umgewidmeter Traktionsbatterien. In J. Becker, D. Beverungen, M. Winter, & S. Menne (Eds.), Umwidmung und Weiterverwendung von Traktionsbatterien: Szenarien, Dienstleistungen und Entscheidungsunterstützung. Springer Vieweg: Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Kolek, E., & Knackstedt, R. (2016). Sustainability in business models–A literature-review-based design-science-oriented research agenda. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS). Istanbul (TR).Google Scholar
  39. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., & Knackstedt, R. (2018a). Design principles for leveraging sustainability in business modelling tools. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Portsmout (UK).Google Scholar
  40. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., & Knackstedt, R. (2018b). The noblest way to learn wisdom is by reflection: Designing software tools for reflecting sustainability in business models. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). San Francisco (USA).Google Scholar
  41. Seidel, S., Müller-Wienbergen, F., & Becker, J. (2010). The concept of creativity in the information systems discipline: Past, present, and prospects. CAIS, 27(2), 14.Google Scholar
  42. Seidel, S., Recker, J. C., & vom Brocke, J. (2013). Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1275–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spotnitz, R. (2003). Simulation of capacity fade in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 113(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strategyzer AG. (2018). Strategyzer web-app. Retrieved from https://strategyzer.com/app.
  46. Strotmeier, M., Jähne, P., Riffel, M., & Winter, A. (2017). Integriertes Softwarewerkzeug für die Cooperation Experience-Modellierungssprache. In J. Becker, T. Bernhold, R. Knackstedt, & M. Matzner (Eds.), Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften. Berlin: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  47. Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., John, T., Knackstedt, R., & Kundisch, D. (2017). How software can support innovating business models: A taxonomy of functions of business model development tools. In Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Boston, MA (USA).Google Scholar
  48. UNECE. (2016). ADR 2017-European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road-Volume I.Google Scholar
  49. Voigt, M., Bergener, K., & Becker, J. (2013). Comprehensive support for creativity-intensive processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(4), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. NY (USA): New York City.Google Scholar
  51. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Knackstedt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sebastian Bräuer
    • 1
  • Thorsten Schoormann
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HildesheimHildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations