Structuring in the Digital Age

  • Michael RosemannEmail author


The act of structuring organizations for different purposes, perspectives and stakeholders in the form of conceptual modelling has a long tradition. Depending on the economic context, the type and focus, i.e. the what, why and how of these models has changed significantly over the past decades. From an initial focus on sound models capturing system structure and behaviour for experts, conceptual models have been used to comprehend, analyse and improve corporate performance, to capture and investigate the experiences of external stakeholders, in particular customers, and more recently to describe how to better deliver according to societal expectations. The requirements for conceptual modelling have been in particular accelerated due to new digital opportunities, but also increased digital literacy in the society. This article differentiates four essential stages in terms of requirements for conceptual modelling. The requirements of each stage remain relevant in today’s and tomorrow’s world and each stage still requires the attention of academic and professional model experts to ensure an ongoing ability to articulate what is needed.


  1. Almquist, E., Senior, J., & Bloch, N. (2016). The elements of value. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., & Räckers, M. (2007). Domain specific process modelling in public administrations—The PICTURE-approach. In International Conference on Electronic Government (Vol. 4656, pp. 68–79). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Schütte, R. (1995). Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 37(5), 435–445.Google Scholar
  4. Botsman, R. (2017). Who Can You Trust?: How Technology Brought Us Together and Why It Might Drive Us Apart. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  5. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine is Yours. The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. Harper Business.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(4).Google Scholar
  7. Champy, J. A., & Hammer, M. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. a manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, P. P.-S. (1976). The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, P. P.-S. (2002). Entity-relationship modeling: historical events, future trends, and lessons learned. In Software Pioneers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietzsch, A., Kluge, C., & Rosemann, M. (2006). How to realise corporate value from enterprise architecture. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. Farrar Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  13. Petri, C. A. (1966). Communication with automata. New York.Google Scholar
  14. Poll, R., Polyvyanyy, A., Rosemann, M., Röglinger, M., & Rupprecht, L. (2018). Process forecasting: Towards proactive business process management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Process Management. Sydney.Google Scholar
  15. Rosemann, M. (2017). The NESTT—Rapid process redesign. In J. vom Brocke & J. Mendling (Eds.), BPM case studies (pp. 1–20). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Rosemann, M., & Kowalkiewicz, M. (2018). The Art of Digital—A Minimum Viable Research Report.
  17. Silva, M. (2012). 50 Years After the Ph.D. Thesis of Carl Adam Petri: A Perspective. IFAC Proceedings, 45(29), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations