Advertisement

Structure, Structure, Structure? Designing and Managing Smart Service Systems as Socio-Technical Structures

  • Daniel BeverungenEmail author
  • Martin Matzner
  • Jens Poeppelbuss
Chapter

Abstract

Since their Ph.D. studies with Jörg Becker at the WWU Muenster, the authors of this article have been involved in designing and managing smart service systems. Smart service systems are value configurations of service providers and service customers that build upon utilizing smart products as boundary objects. They are socio-technical structures that are constituted by two main mechanisms: On the one hand, they can be designed and implemented in processes of (smart) service systems engineering. On the other hand, they emerge as social structures based on the actions performed by people involved in the co-creation of value. As we shall see in this article, both mechanisms are aligned with management principles that Jörg Becker has held dear for many years.

Keywords

Smart service system Hybrid value creation IT artifact Guided emergence 

References

  1. Allmendinger, G., & Lombreglia, R. (2005). Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 131–145.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. M. (2009). The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(5), 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, J., Beverungen, D., & Knackstedt, R. (2008). Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke von Produzenten und Dienstleistern als Option zur Organisation der Erstellung hybrider Leistungsbündel. In J. Becker, R. Knackstedt & D. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke-Konzepte für das Netzwerkmanagement und Potenziale aktueller Informationstechnologien (pp. 3–31). Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., Glauner, C., Stypmann, M., Rosenkranz, C., … Leimeister, J. M. (2008). Ordnungsrahmen für die hybride Wertschöpfung. In O. Thomas & M. Nüttgens (Eds.), Dienstleistungsmodellierung (pp. 109–128). Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., Matzner, M., Müller, O., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2013a). Bridging the gap between manufacturing and service through IT-based boundary objects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), 468–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., Matzner, M., Müller, O., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2013b). Designing interaction routines in service networks: A modularity and social construction-based approach. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–68.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, J., & Meise, V. (2012). Strategie und Ordnungsrahmen. In J. Becker, M. Kugeler, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Prozessmanagement (pp. 113–163). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (2004). Handelsinformationssysteme: Domänenorientierte Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik (2nd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Redline Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
  10. Beverungen, D. (2014). Exploring the interplay of the design and emergence of business processes as organizational routines. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beverungen, D., Lüttenberg, H., & Wolf, V. (2018). Recombinant service systems engineering. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(5), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beverungen, D., Matzner, M., & Janiesch, C. (2017). Information systems for smart services. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 15(4), 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2017). Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electronic Markets, forthcoming, 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Bouwman, H., Faber, E., Haaker, T., Kijl, B., & De Reuver, M. (2008). Conceptualizing the STOF Model. In B. Harry, H. De Vos, & H. Timber (Eds.), Mobile service innovation and business models (pp. 31–70). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2009). Publicly Available Specification (PAS) 1094: Product-Service Systems–Value Creation by Integrating Goods and Services. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of theory of structuration. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Herterich, M. M., Buehnen, T., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2016). A taxonomy of industrial service systems enabled by digital product innovation. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1236–1245). Koloa (HI): IEEE.Google Scholar
  20. Lovelock, C., & Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing?: In Search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matzner, M., Plenter, F., Chasin, F., Betzing, J., & von Hoffen, M. (2018). New service development through action design research in joint research projects. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2018). Portsmouth (UK).Google Scholar
  23. Österle, H., & Otto, B. (2010). Consortium research: A method for researcher-practitioner collaboration in design-oriented IS research. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 2(5), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  25. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pöppelbuß, J., & Durst, C. (2017). Smart Service Canvas–Ein Werkzeug zur strukturierten Beschreibung und Entwicklung von Smart-Service-Geschäftsmodellen. In M. Bruhn & K. Hadwich (Eds.), Dienstleistungen 4.0 (pp. 91–110). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence (pp. 37–54). London: Pitman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulaga, W., & Reinartz, W. J. (2011). Hybrid offerings: How manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. Elsevier, 6(4), 314–324.Google Scholar
  34. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Why “Service”? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Velamuri, V. K., Neyer, A.-K., & Möslein, K. M. (2011). Hybrid value creation: A systematic review of an evolving research area. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 61(1), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Beverungen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Matzner
    • 2
  • Jens Poeppelbuss
    • 3
  1. 1.Paderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergNurembergGermany
  3. 3.Ruhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations