An Investigation of Alliance Portfolio Diversity Impact on Firm Performance

  • Chih-Ching Hung
  • Shang-En Yu
  • Nai-Chang ChengEmail author
  • Chun-Hsien Wang
  • Wen-Hsin Chiang
  • Hong-Tsu Young
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 264)


Looking for remotely accessible assets had been portrayed as a critical piece of the advancement procedure. To get outside learning sources, firms must associate their in-house imaginative based exercises with outer accomplice to get to outer assets and extend their agreeable district. This investigation look at the experimentally that the union accomplice decent variety and union geographic assorted variety influences the levels of item and imaginative curiosity. One of the key points of the investigation is to investigate how assorted variety vital influences item advancement accomplishment in the innovative setting. Expanding on the information based hypothesis perspective of the organizations, this examination suggests that how these assorted variety portfolio including accomplices decent variety and coalition geographic decent variety, impact firm item oddity since this element reflects whether the organizations are probably going to disguise outside assets to improve their development results. This examination tests speculations drawn from the Network Advancement Overview (CIS), review by the Taiwan Service of Science and Innovation. The observationally results finding that collusion accomplice assorted variety and coalition geographic decent variety demonstrates an upset U-molded impact on curiosity.


Alliance partner diversity Alliance geographic diversity Product novelty Openness Portfolio 


  1. Blau, P.M.: Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure, Vol. 7. Free Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A.K.: Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manag. 36(3), 229–236 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M.: How open is innovation? Res. Policy 39(6), 699–709 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., Tribó, J.A.: Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 38(1), 96–105 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gassmann, O.: Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Manag. 36(3), 223–228 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 109–122 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagedoorn, J.: Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Laursen, K., Salter, A.: Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 27(2), 131–150 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Lichtenthaler, U.: Open Innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. Eng. Manag. IEEE Trans. 55(1), 148–157 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lichtenthaler, U.: Open Innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 25(1), 75–93 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. Noseleit, F., de Faria, P.: Complementarities of internal R&D and alliances with different partner types. J. Bus. Res. 66(10), 2000–2006 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Østergaard, C.R., Timmermans, B., Kristinsson, K.: Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Res. Policy 40(3), 500–509 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parkhe, A.: Partner nationality and the structure-performance relationship in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 4(2), 301–324 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qian, G., Khoury, T.A., Peng, M.W., Qian, Z.: The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(9), 1018–1030 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Srivastava, M.K., Gnyawali, D.R.: When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 54(4), 797–810 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., Vanhaverbeke, W.: Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Manag. 36(3), 347–363 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K.: Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res. Policy 40(3), 463–472 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, J., Wu, Z.: ocal and international knowledge search and product innovation: The moderating role of technology boundary spanning. Int. Bus. Rev. 23, 542–551 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Ching Hung
    • 1
  • Shang-En Yu
    • 2
  • Nai-Chang Cheng
    • 3
    Email author
  • Chun-Hsien Wang
    • 4
  • Wen-Hsin Chiang
    • 4
  • Hong-Tsu Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of TourismMing Chuan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Tainan Human Resources AssociationTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of BioBusiness ManagementNational Chiayi UniversityChiayiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations