Advertisement

A Novel Method of Surface Tension Test for Melt Slags Based on Hot Thermocouple Technique

  • Zhe Wang
  • Guanghua WenEmail author
  • Ping Tang
  • Zibing Hou
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Currently, the sessile drop method and the maximum bubble method are widely used to measure the surface tension of melt slags. For the above methods, the slow heating rate of furnace decreases the test efficiency. The hot thermocouple technique is widely used in the measurement of the high-temperature performance of molten slags. The slag will form droplets on the thermocouple due to the capillarity, and based on the rapid heating-up and Young’s equation, this study used the Single Hot Thermocouple Technique (SHTT) for the test of CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 (CSA) and the CaO–SiO2–Al2O3–MgO (CSAM) slag systems. The results show that the interfacial tension between the CSA, CSAM slags and the thermocouple is 2117.76–2131.89 mN/m at 1500 °C. The surface tension of the CSA, CSAM slags can be obtained by Young’s equation. Compared with the surface tension measured by the standard test, the SHTT surface tension test error is within 5%.

Keywords

SHTT Molten slag Contact angle Interfacial tension Surface tension 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51574050).

References

  1. 1.
    Boni RE, Derge G (1956) Surface tensions of silicates. JOM 8:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quincke G (1869) Ann Phys 138:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujii H et al (2006) Surface tension of molten silicon measured by microgravity oscillating drop method and improved sessile drop method. Acta Mater 54:1221–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bashforth F, Adams J (1883) An attempt to test the theories of capillary action. University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kashiwaya Y et al (1998) Development of double and single hot thermocouple technique for in situ observation and measurement of mold slag crystallization. ISIJ Int 38:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou L et al (2012) A kinetic study of the effect of basicity on the mold fluxes crystallization. Metall Mater Trans B 43:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Welch JH (1954) A simple microscope attachment for observing high-temperature phenomena. J Sci Instrum 31:458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kashiwaya Y, Cicutti CE, Cramb AW (1998) An investigation of the crystallization of a continuous casting mold slag using the single hot thermocouple technique. ISIJ Int 38:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ordway F (1952) Techniques for growing and mounting small single crystals of refractory compounds. National Bureau of StandardsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang W et al (2018) High-temperature properties of mold flux observed and measured in situ by single/double hot-thermocouple technique. JOM 70:1248–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou L et al (2018) Effect of Li2O on the behavior of melting, crystallization, and structure for CaO–Al2O3-based mold fluxes. Metall Mater Trans B 49:2232–2240Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou L et al (2013) Computational modeling of temperature, flow, and crystallization of mold slag during double hot thermocouple technique experiments. Metall Mater Trans B 44:1264–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cramb AW, Jimbo I (1989) Calculation of the interfacial properties of liquid steel–slag systems. Steel Res 60:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jung EJ, Min DJ (2012) Effect of Al2O3 and MgO on interfacial tension between calcium silicate‐based melts and a solid steel substrate. Steel Res Int 83:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li Y et al (2011) Determination and calculation for the surface tension of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 melts. Male, MaldivesGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allibert M et al (1995) Slag Atlas, 2nd edn. Verlag Stahleisen GmbH, Düsseldorf, p 446Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tran R et al (2016) Surface energies of elemental crystals. Sci Data 3:160080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Butt HJ, Graf K, Kappl M (2006) Physics and chemistry of interfaces. WileyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations