Advertisement

Ecological Footprint Model of Cultivated Land Based on Ecosystem Services in Beijing

  • Hui Guo
  • Di Wu
  • Lei Fa
  • Shunxiang Pei
  • Xuebing XinEmail author
  • Shumin Ma
  • Sha Wu
  • Shiwei Dong
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 545)

Abstract

The existing ecological footprint model is limited to the defects of material production and consumption. The researchers proposed an ecological footprint model based on ecosystem services (EF-ES) to strengthen research into the services provided by ecosystems, and calculated and analyzed the cultivated land in Beijing from 1995 to 2010. The results shows that: (1) from 1995 to 2000, the equilibrium factors of cultivated land in Beijing were relatively stable in EF-ES, but the yield factors in 2000 were significantly lower than that of the other years; (2) the equilibrium factors based on EF-ES were far less than other methods results. It was mainly due to ecosystem services provided by farmland ecosystem which is far less than the other ecosystem types. The yield factor based on EF-ES was similar to the result of EF-NPP; (3) the annual ecological carrying capacity was the lowest, and the ecological deficit was the highest in 2000. The ecological deficit gradually decreased from 1995 to 2010. Compared with EF-NPP, the ecological deficit of EF-ES was small, which showed that the ecological services provided by cultivated land can compensate for the ecological deficit caused by material production. The calculation results based on the model accord with the development of urban agriculture in Beijing. So EF-ES has an objective and comprehensive response to the ecological security of cultivated land, and it is a good expression for the localization of ecological footprint.

Keywords

Ecosystem service Ecological footprint Equivalence factor Yield factor Cultivated land 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program (No. 2015BAD07B0202) and the Youth Foundation of Forestry Experiment Center of North China (No. ECFNC2014-03).

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, M.C., Li, W.H., Xie, G.D.: Estination of China ecological footprint production coefficient based on net primary productivity. Chin. J. Ecol. 29(3), 592–597 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Alvareng, R.A.F., Da Silva Júnior, V.P., Soares, S.R.: Comparison of the Ecological footprint and a life cycle impact assessment method for a case study on Brazilian broiler feed production. J. Clea. Prod. 28, 25–32 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bicknell, K.B., Ball, R.J., Cullen, R., Bigsby, R.H.: New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecol. Econ. 27(2), 149–160 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kratena, K.: From ecological footprint to ecological rent: an economic indicator for resource constraints. Ecol. Econ. 64(3), 507–516 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, S., Li, Z.Z., Li, W.D.: A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecol. Mode. 185(1), 65–75 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pereira, L., Ortega, E.: A modified footprint method: the case study of Brazil. Ecol. Indi. 16, 113–127 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niccolucci, V., Bastianoni, S., Tiezzi, E.B.P., Wackernagel, M., Marchettini, N.: How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation. Ecol. Mode. 220(20), 2819–2823 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niccolucci, V., Galli, A., Reed, A., Neri, E., Wackernagel, M., Bastianoni, S.: Towards a 3D national ecological footprint geography. Ecol. Mode. 222(16), 2939–2944 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fang, K.: Ecological footprint depth and size: new indicators for a 3D model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 33(1), 267–274 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fang, K.: Assessing the natural capital use of eleven nations: an application of a revised three-dimensional model of ecological footprint. Act. Ecol. Sin. 35(11), 3766–3777 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    WWF, ZSL, GFN.: Living Planet Report 2012 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Venetoulis, J., Talberth, J.: Refining the ecological footprint. Envi. Deve. Sust. 10(4), 441–469 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, G., Ren, Z.Y., Han, H.Z.: Ecological footprint calculation of Shaanxi province based on net primary productivity. J. Shanxi Nor. Uni. (Nat. Sci. Edit.) 42(5), 84–89 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song, Z.J., Liu, L.M.: Spatial characteristics analysis for multifunctional transition of suburban agricultural areas in Beijing. Sci. Geog. Sin. 4, 427–433 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wackernagel, M., et al.: National foorprint and biocapacity accounts 2005. The underlying calculation method. Global Footprint Network, Oakland (2005). www.footprintnetwork.org
  16. 16.
    Xie, G.D., Zhang, C.X., Zhang, L.M., Chen, W.H., Li, S.M.: Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. J. Nat. Res. 30(8), 1243–1254 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wackernagel, M., Reese, E.: Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, pp. 192–210. New Society Publishers, Nanaimo (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    World wildlife fund: Living Planet Report 2000. http://www.panda.org/downloads/general/lpr_2000.pfd
  19. 19.
    Chambers, N., Smmons, C., Wackernagel, M.: Ecological Footprint Analysis Towards a Sustainability Indicator for Business, pp. 154–158. London Earthscan Publications Ltd, London (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, J.X.: Time series and geographical distribution of ecological footprint for China. Northeastern University, Shenyang (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, M.C., Li, W.H.: Calculation of equivalence factor used in ecological footprint for China and its provinces based on net primary production. J. Ecol. Rur. Envi. 26(5), 401–406 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie, G.D., Lu, C.X., Cheng, S.K., Zheng, D.: Evaluation of natural capital utilization with ecological footprint in China. Res. Sci. 23(6), 20–23 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang, X.M., Pan, Y.C., Hao, X.Y., Liu, Y.: Calculation method of cultivated land consolidation ecological potential in China. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 31(17), 270–277 (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiao, W.J., Min, Q.W., Li, W.H., Fuller, A.M.: Development and application of ecosystem-service-based ecological footprint models. Res. Sci. 36(11), 2392–2400 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hui Guo
    • 1
  • Di Wu
    • 1
  • Lei Fa
    • 1
  • Shunxiang Pei
    • 1
  • Xuebing Xin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shumin Ma
    • 1
  • Sha Wu
    • 1
  • Shiwei Dong
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Forestry Experiment Center of North ChinaChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in AgricultureBeijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in AgricultureBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations