Advertisement

A Theory Based Dialogic Learning Architecture for Sustained Innovative Collaborative Learning Across Diversity and Professional Borders

  • Elsebeth Wejse Korsgaard SorensenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 265)

Abstract

This paper addresses theoretically the challenge of establishment of a networked learning architecture appropriate for the sustained design of both continuing and professional education. Bringing in theoretical concepts, together with affordances of digital technologies, and using an action research meta-methodology of critical research, the paper attempts to elucidate make transparent the type of considerations and discussions needed as a prerequisite for forming a general concept/model for pedagogic design for professional and continuing education. The study finalizes with a suggestion for a conceptual model for producing innovative learning processes within professional and continuing education.

Keywords

Learning design Learning as negotiated identification Collaborative dialogue Virtual environments Innovation Creativity Digital Dialogue (DD) Collaborative Knowledge Building (CKB) Agency Meta-learning Networked learning Empowerment 

References

  1. 1.
    Oestergaard, R., Sorensen, E.K.: Networked learning as a process of identification in the intersection of collaborative knowledge building. Fostering creativity, awareness and re-use of OER. In: Proceedings of the European Conference for Open and Distance E-Learning, EDEN 2011, held at the University College Dublin (UCD), 19–22 June 2011, pp. 22–26 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conole, G.: Designing for learning in an Open World. Springer, New York (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nowotny, H.: Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation. Berghahn Books, New York (2006). ISBN 9781845451172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sorensen, E.K., O’Murchú, D.: Identifying an appropriate, pedagogical, networked architecture for online learning communities within higher and continuing education. In: Sorensen, E.K., O’Murchú, D. (eds.) Enhancing Learning Through Technology, pp. 226–251. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harlung, A.H.: Open Educational Resources in Denmark. Status report 2010, Center for IT and Learning, Aarhus University, Denmark (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helms, N.H., Agerbæk, L.: Nettets læringstopografi. Et anslag til didaktisk kortlægning af metaverse, i Onedge 2_10, Knowledge Lab, University of Southern Denmark (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalsgaard, C., Sorensen, E.K.: A typology for Web 2.0, pp. 272–279. ECEL (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalsgaard, C.N.: Internettet som personaliseret og social medie. Læring & Medier (LOM) 3(5) (2010). ISSN: 1903-248XGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sorensen, E.K., Brooks, E.I.: Promoting agency and identity building in dialogic learning communities online. Submitted for the Networked Learning conference to be held in Zagreb, Croatia, 14–16 May 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen, H.V., Sorensen, E.K., De Lopez, K.J., Jensen, R.H.S. (eds.): It-baseret inklusion af elever med udviklings- og opmærksomhedsproblemer i folkeskolen. Aalborg:Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 194 p. (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorensen, E.K., Brooks, E.I.: Designing Inclusive Reflective Learning with Digital Democratic Dialogue Across Boundaries and Diversities. Published in the Proceedings of the Design, Learning and Innovation (DLI) Conference, held in Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 30–31 October 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorensen, E. K (2008). Design of dialogic eLearning-to-learn: metalearning as pedagogical methodology. Int. J. Web Based Communities 4(2), 244–252 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skovsmose, O., Borba, B.: Research Methodology and Critical Mathematics Education. Res. Socio-Polit. Dimens. Math. Educ.: Issues Power Theory Methodol. 2004, 207–226 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barab, S., Squire, K.: Design based research: putting a stake in the ground. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 1–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Østergaard, R.: Master thesis: Professionsuddannelse i et fremtidsperspektiv, p. 2004. Aalborg Universitet, Brobygning mellem teori og praksis i fysioterapeutuddannelsen (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darsø, L.: Innovationspædagogik: kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence. Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards, A., Mackenzie, L.: Steps towards participation: the social support of learning trajectories. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 24(4), 287–302 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakhtin, M.M.: Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. University of Texas, Austin (1986)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edwards, A.: Being an Expert Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Springer, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Edwards, A.: Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. Int. J. Educ. Res. 50, 33–39 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wegerif, R.: Dialogic education: what is it and why do we need it? Educ. Rev. 19(2), 58–67 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wegerif, R.: Applying dialogic theory to illuminate the relationship between literacy education and teaching thinking in the context of the Internet Age. Contribution to a special issue on International Perspectives on Dialogic Theory and Practice, edited by Sue Brindley, Mary Juzwik, and Alison Whitehurst. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 16, p. 1–21 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.02.07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bateson, G.: Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1976)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edwards, A.: Relational agency in professional practice: a CHAT analysis. An Int. J. Hum. Act. Theory 1, 1–17 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Edwards, A.: Cultural Historical Activity Theory and Learning: a relational turn. TLRP Annual Conference Keynote Address, University of Warwick (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborg OestDenmark

Personalised recommendations