Advertisement

An Interactive Multisensory Virtual Environment for Developmentally Disabled

  • Alexandru Diaconu
  • Flaviu Vreme
  • Henrik Sæderup
  • Hans Pauli Arnoldson
  • Patrick Stolc
  • Anthony L. BrooksEmail author
  • Michael Boelstoft Holte
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 265)

Abstract

This paper investigates the interaction of developmentally disabled adults with a mediated multisensory virtual reality experience within a familiar social context. This was done as part of an exploratory case study. To this end, a media technological artefact was derived from the Snoezelen concept, a multisensory environment for stimulation and relaxation. This system is comprised of an HTC Vive based virtual reality environment tailored to the specific requirements of the case and its stakeholders. Play sessions were conducted at Udviklingscenter Ribe, a residence and development centre for the disabled. After compiling passive and participant observations from the sessions, and interviews with key staff, a series of guidelines were proposed. These guidelines encapsulate the project’s concerns and overarching trends and provide a future basis of study when designing and developing an interactive multisensory virtual environment.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Snoezelen Multisensory environment Interaction Recreation Developmental disability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Udviklingscenter Ribe for their collaboration on this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Pagliano, P.: Using a Multisensory Environment: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Routledge, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zaman, H.B., et al. (eds.): Advances in Visual Informatics, vol. 9429. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25939-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lancioni, G.E., Cuvo, A.J., O’Reilly, M.F.: Snoezelen: an overview of research with people with developmental disabilities and dementia. Disabil. Rehabil. 24(4), 175–184 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Staal, J.A., Pinkney, L., Roane, D.M.: Assessment of stimulus preferences in multisensory environment therapy for older people with dementia. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 66(12), 542–550 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jerald, J.: The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality, 1st edn. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spanlang, B., et al.: How to build an embodiment lab: achieving body representation illusions in virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 1 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21(4), 373–387 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murphy, D.: Bodiless embodiment: a descriptive survey of avatar bodily coherence in first-wave consumer VR applications. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 265–266 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryan, M.-L.: Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juan, M.C., Pérez, D.: Using augmented and virtual reality for the development of acrophobic scenarios. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety. Comput. Graph. 34(6), 756–766 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon, J.H., Powell, J., Chalmers, A.: How level of realism influences anxiety in virtual reality environments for a job interview. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71(10), 978–987 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerling, K., Livingston, I., Nacke, L., Mandryk, R.: Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1873–1882 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simeone, A.L., Velloso, E., Gellersen, H.: Substitutional reality: using the physical environment to design virtual reality experiences. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3307–3316, ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hancock, D.R., Algozzine, R.: Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers, 3rd edn. Teachers College Press, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baxter, P.: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual. Rep. 13(4), 544–559 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernard, H.R. (ed.): Handbook of methods in Cultural Anthropology, 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandru Diaconu
    • 1
  • Flaviu Vreme
    • 1
  • Henrik Sæderup
    • 1
  • Hans Pauli Arnoldson
    • 1
  • Patrick Stolc
    • 1
  • Anthony L. Brooks
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Boelstoft Holte
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Design and Media TechnologyAalborg University EsbjergEsbjergDenmark

Personalised recommendations