Advertisement

Abstract

This paper describes different types of activities/challenges designed for social interaction, while discussing the performance of such challenges using the mobile digital game “Secrets of the South” (http://secretsofthesouth.tbm.tudelft.nl/, Secrets of the South). The game was played as part of a scientific meeting, with participants from 25 to 62 years of age and a varying degree of cultural differences. The presentation and discussion of the results of the gameplay provide insights on the appropriateness of the different challenges for social interaction in a playful city. Directions for future work for such challenge designs are presented.

Keywords

Serious games Social interaction Playable cities 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements are due to Amir Fard, Hendrik Engelbrecht, Isabelle Kniestedt, Kusnandar Kusnandar, Daniel Broca, Chun Cheung, Bramka Jafino, Els van Daalen, and to the research project that supported this research10.

References

  1. 1.
    Ball, K., Cleland, V.J., Timperio, A.F., et al.: Love thy neighbour? Associations of social capital and crime with physical activity amongst women. Soc. Sci. Med. 71, 807–814 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braaten, L.J.: Group cohesion: a new multidimensional model. Group 15, 39–55 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheok, A.D., et al.: Human Pacman: a mobile entertainment system with ubiquitous computing and tangible interaction over a wide outdoor area. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2795, pp. 209–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chittaro, L., Sioni, R.: Turning the Classic Snake Mobile Game into a Location-Based Exergame that Encourages Walking, vol. 7284. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooley, C.H.: Primary groups. In: Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind, pp. 23–31. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York (1909)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cox, T.H., Lobel, S.A., McLeod, P.L.: Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Manag. 34(4), 827–847 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Council of Europe: Report of High-Level Task Force on Social Cohesion: Towards an Active, Fair and Socially Cohesive Europe (2008). Accessed 28 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Festinger, L., Back, K.W., Schachter, S.: Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., Brazier, F.: Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innov.: Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
  10. 10.
    Galinsky, A.D., Ku, G., Wang, C.S.: Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 8(2), 109–124 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Görgü, L., Campbell, A.G., McCusker, K., et al.: Freegaming: mobile, collaborative, adaptive and augmented exergaming. Mob. Inf. Syst. 8(4), 287–301 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Groenewegen, P.P., van den Berg, A.E., de Vries, S., et al.: Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health 6, 149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lott, A.J., Lott, B.E.: Group cohesiveness and individual learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 57, 61–73 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nijholt, A.: How to make cities more fun. Wall Str. J. (Eastern Edition) (2017). ISSN: 0099-9660Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nijholt, A.: Playable cities: a short survey (Keynote Paper). In: 2017 6th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision & 2017 7th International Symposium in Computational Medical and Health Technology (ICIEV-ISCMHT), Himeji, Japan (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peeters, M., Megens, C., Hoven, E.V.D., et al.: Social stairs: taking the piano staircase towards long-term behavioral change. In: PERSUASIVE: International Conference on Persuasive Technology. 8th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2013, Sydney, NSW, Australia (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peters, K., Elands, B., Buijs, A.: Social interactions in urban parks: stimulating social cohesion? Urban For. Urban Green. 9(2), 93–100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peters, K., Elands, B., Buijs, A.: Social interactions in urban parks: stimulating social cohesion? Urban For. Urban Green. 9, 93–100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polansky, N., Lippitt, R., Redl, F.: An investigation of behavioral contagion in groups. Hum. Relat. 3, 319–348 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharp, J., Pollock, V., Paddison, R.: Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Stud. 42(5–6), 1001–1023 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stokes, J.P.: Components of group cohesion intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small Group Res. 14, 163–173 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verhaegh, J., Soute, I., Kessels, A., et al.: On the design of Camelot, an outdoor game for children. In: Proceeding IDC 2006 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Winden, W.V.: The end of social exclusion? On information technology policy as a key to social inclusion in large European cities. Reg. Stud. 35(9), 861–877 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands

Personalised recommendations