• Philipp Golka


Arguing that the emergence of new cooperative relations between financial and nonfinancial actors is at the core of the recent rise of finance, this chapter proposes a new perspective on financialization processes that is based on sociological field theory. Golka argues that support from nonfinancial actors such as governments is vital for financial actors seeking to expand the reach of capital to different areas of social life, including social welfare or environmental protection. To understand how such cooperation unfolds—or is contained—Golka traces the development of social impact investing, financial products that aim at the provision of social welfare, through its interaction with British social policy. He argues that investors’ success in forging cooperation hinged upon their abilities to frame financialization as social welfare.


  1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckert, J. (2003). Economic sociology and embeddedness: How shall we conceptualize economic action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37(3), 769–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belfrage, C. (2008). Towards ‘universal financialisation’ in Sweden? Contemporary Politics, 14(3), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fligstein, N. (2001b). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forst, R. (2015a). Normativität und Macht. Zur analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellchaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. JP Morgan. (2014). Spotlight on the market: The impact investor survey. Retrieved from
  12. Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.Google Scholar
  15. Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van der Zwan, N. (2014). Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Golka
    • 1
  1. 1.Sociology of Markets, Organizations and GovernanceFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations