Advertisement

Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring: MERCI to Predict Economic Impact

  • F. MichardEmail author
  • G. Manecke
Chapter
Part of the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (AUICEM)

Abstract

Most hemodynamic monitoring techniques have an associated cost. Although difficult to quantify, the cost of their implementation may be significant, particularly for techniques requiring prolonged high-level training, such as echocardiography. These costs, or upfront investments, may be an obstacle to hospital adoption. Importantly, a fair evaluation of the return on investment must take into account the potential savings associated with a reduction in postoperative complications and hospital length of stay.

References

  1. 1.
    Dimick JB, Weeks WB, Karia RJ. Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254:907–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B, et al. Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA. 2013;309:1599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manecke G, Asemota A, Michard F. Tackling the economic burden of postsurgical complications: would goal directed fluid therapy help? Crit Care. 2014;18:566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michard F, Mountford WK, Krukas MR, et al. Potential return on investment for implementation of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in major surgery: a nationwide database study. Perioper Med. 2015;4:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad T, Beilstein CM, Aldecoa C, et al. Variation in haemodynamic monitoring for major surgery in European nations: secondary analysis of the EuSOS dataset. Perioper Med. 2015;4:8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grocott MPW, Dushianthan A, Hamilton MA, et al. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:535–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michard F, Giglio MT, Brienza N. Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joshi GP, Kehlet H. CON: perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy is an essential element of an enhanced recovery protocol? Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1261–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pestana D, Espinosa E, Eden A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS Study (PeriOperative goal-directed therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery). Anesth Analg. 2014;119:579–87.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stens J, Hering JP, van der Hoeven CWP, et al. The added value of cardiac index and pulse pressure variation monitoring to mean arterial pressure-guided volume therapy in moderate-risk abdominal surgery (COGUIDE): a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:1078–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michard F. MERCI for improving quality of surgical care at no cost. World J Surg. 2016;40:3095–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landais A, Morel M, Goldstein J, et al. Evaluation of financial burdens following complications after major surgery in France: potential returns after perioperative goal directed therapy. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36:151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartha E, Davidson T, Hommel A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of goal-directed hemodynamic treatment of elderly hip fracture patients: before clinical research starts. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:519–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebm C, Cecconi M, Sutton L. A cost-effectiveness analysis of postoperative goal directed therapy for high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boyd O, Grounds M, Bennett ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA. 1993;270:2699–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. 1999;318:1099–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin J, Min S, Liu D, et al. Clinical and economic impact of goal-directed fluid therapy during elective gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med. 2018;7:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hand WR, Stoll WD, McEvoy MD, et al. Intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management in free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38:E1974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sadique Z, Harrison DA, Grieve R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy algorithm in high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med. 2015;4:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flynn DN, Speck RM, Mahmoud NN, et al. The impact of complications following open colectomy on hospital finances: a retrospective cohort study. Perioper Med. 2014;3:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MiCoDenensSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyUCSD Medical CenterSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations