Should We Abandon Measuring SvO2 or ScvO2 in Patients with Sepsis?

  • J.-L. TeboulEmail author
  • X. Monnet
  • D. De Backer
Part of the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (AUICEM)


The mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) has been used to assess the adequacy of oxygen delivery (DO2) to oxygen consumption (VO2). Since central venous catheters (CVCs) are now more often inserted than pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) in critically ill patients, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been proposed as a substitute for SvO2. In 2001, Rivers et al. proposed a step-by-step strategy called early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) that aimed at normalizing the ScvO2 within the first 6 h of resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock [1]. A single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that application of EGDT significantly decreased mortality in comparison with a control group, in which ScvO2 was not used [1]. Following the publication by Rivers et al. [1], EGDT was endorsed by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) in 2004 [2]. More recently, three multicenter RCTs (ProCESS [3], ARISE [4] and ProMISe [5]) compared EGDT (using ScvO2) to standard care (with no use of ScvO2). In none of these trials did EGDT show any benefit in terms of outcome, as confirmed by a meta-analysis [6]. Differences between the trials (design/study population/management of the control group/general management of patients with sepsis) may have contributed to the divergent results of these trials [7]. Nevertheless, the SSC experts removed ScvO2 (and SvO2) from the recommendations of the most recent version of the SSC guidelines [8]. While targeting specific predefined values in all patients may be questioned, it is probably unwise to neglect the potential interest of measuring SvO2/ScvO2 in patients with sepsis. In this chapter, we discuss why there is still a place for the measurement of SvO2 or ScvO2 in patients with sepsis.


  1. 1.
    Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:858–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, et al. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock - a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Backer D, Vincent JL. Early goal-directed therapy: do we have a definitive answer? Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1048–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kasnitz P, Druger GL, Yorra F, Simmons DH. Mixed venous oxygen tension and hyperlactatemia. JAMA. 1976;236:570–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlichtig R, Cowden WL, Chaitman BR. Tolerance of unusually low mixed venous oxygen saturation. Adaptations in the chronic low cardiac output syndrome. Am J Med. 1986;80:813–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G, Katz NM, Seneff MG, Shah M. Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest. 2004;126:1891–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C, Bredle DL. Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1572–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dueck MH, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, Weigand C, Boerner U. Trends but not individual values of central venous oxygen saturation agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation during varying hemodynamic conditions. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varpula M, Karlsson S, Ruokonen E, Pettilä V. Mixed venous oxygen saturation cannot be estimated by central venous oxygen saturation in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutierrez G, Comignani P, Huespe L, et al. Central venous to mixed venous blood oxygen and lactate gradients are associated with outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1662–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Beest PA, van Ingen J, Boerma EC, et al. No agreement of mixed venous and central venous saturation in sepsis, independent of sepsis origin. Crit Care. 2010;14:R219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Backer D, Creteur J, Noordally O, Smail N, Gulbis B, Vincent JL. Does hepato-splanchnic VO2/DO2 dependency exist in critically ill septic patients? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:1219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boulain T, Garot D, Vignon P, et al. Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study. Crit Care. 2014;18:609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pope JV, Jones AE, Gaieski DF, Arnold RC, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI. Multi-center study of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Textoris J, Fouché L, Wiramus S, et al. High central venous oxygen saturation in the latter stages of septic shock is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care. 2011;15:R176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monnet X, Julien F, Ait-Hamou N, et al. Lactate and veno-arterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-venous oxygen difference ratio, but not central venous oxygen saturation, predict increase in oxygen consumption in fluid responders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, et al. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1350–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service de réanimation médicaleUniv Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Hôpital de BicêtreLe Kremlin-BicêtreFrance
  2. 2.Department of Intensive CareCHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations