Advertisement

Ignoring the Brandt Line? Dimensions and Implications of the North-South Divide from Today’s Policy Perspective

  • Juliane Corredor JiménezEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Among the different terminologies, the concept of the “Global South” has been applied to describe the division of the world into “poorer” and “wealthier” countries. Starting from the two Brandt Reports as reference points, it is argued that the concept of a Global North and Global South is still relevant today, as it conceptualizes global differences in economic power and political representation. It is important to acknowledge different needs and interests between the two poles. Ignoring the divide may lead to ineffective policy outcomes, especially for issues with common interest to all. It is advocated to increase knowledge and data production in the South as well as a bottom-up policy approach that incentivizes entrepreneurship and innovation, so that egalitarian conditions for negotiations and representation can be established.

Keywords

Global South Brandt reports Climate change Development 

References

  1. Amuzegar, J. (1976). The north-south dialogue: From conflict to compromise. Foreign Affairs, 54(3), 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrighi, G., Silver, B. J., & Brewer, B. D. (2003). Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the north-south divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boatca, M. (2015). Not having neutral terms does not equal having no terms at all. In Concepts of the global south - voices from around the world. Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  4. Brandt, W. (1983). Common crisis, north-south: Cooperation for world recovery. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, W. et al. (1980). North-south: A programme for survival. Independent Commission on International Development Issues.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, W. (1965). Preface. In A. Moyes & T. Hayter (Eds.), World III. A handbook on developing countries. Oxford/New York: Pergamom Press/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Cui, W. (2016). Comparison between north-south aid and south-south cooperation: Based on the analysis of the new development finance institutions. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 21(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duck, L. A. (2015). The global south via the US south. In Concepts of the global south - voices from around the world. Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich, T. (1980). The north-south dialogue. Articles by Maurer faculty, paper 1818. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1818
  10. Grugel, J., & Hout, W. (1999). Regionalism across the north-south divide. In State strategies and globalization. European political science series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Harrod, R. (1958). The possibility of economic satiety - use of economic growth for improving the quality of education and leisure. In Problems of United States economic development (Vol. 1, pp. 207–213). New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
  12. Hoogvelt, A. (1997). Globalization and the postcolonial world: The new political economy of development. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurrell, A., & Kingsburry, B. (1993). The international politics on the environment: An introduction. In A. Hurrell & B. Kingsburry (Eds.), The international politics of the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Karlsson, S. (2002). The north-south knowledge divide: Consequences for global environmental governance. In D. C. Esty & M. H. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance: Options & opportunities. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.Google Scholar
  15. Kjellén, B. (2008). A new diplomacy for sustainable development: The challenge of global change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Landes, H., & Porcher, T. (2015). Le Déni Climatique (Max Milo Éditions). Paris: Collection Essais-Documents.Google Scholar
  17. Lees, N. (2011). The dimensions of the divide: Theorising inequality and the Brandt line in international relations. In Paper presented at the IPSA ECPR Joint Conference ‘Whatever Happened to North-South?’, Sao Paulo 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Manzanares, J. (2018). Despite challenges, green climate fund is critical to global action. Article published via official website of the green climate fund, August 15, 2018. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from http://news.trust.org//item/20180814131809-aejsh/
  19. Mendez, A. (2015). Discussion on the global south. In Concepts of the global south - voices from around the world. Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  20. Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds Apart: Global and International Inequality, 1950–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Quilligan, J. B. (2002). The Brandt equation. 21st century blueprint for the new global economy. Philadelphia: Brandt 21 Forum.Google Scholar
  22. Rigg, J. (2015). The global south. In Concepts of the global south–voices from around the world. Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  23. Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing. Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanwal, M. (2015). The world’s search for sustainable development. A perspective from the global south. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sauvy, A. (1952). Trois mondes, une planète. L’Observateur, 118, 5.Google Scholar
  26. Solarz, M. W. (2014). The language of global development. A misleading geography. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. South-South Dialogue. (1979). A Brief Report. Third World Quarterly, 1(2), 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. et al. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/overview-eng.pdf
  29. Strong, M. (1993). Achieving sustainable global development. In Facing the challenge. Responses to the report of the south commission (pp. 305–313). London/New Jersey: The South Centre/Zed Books.Google Scholar
  30. Thérien, J.-P. (1999). Beyond the north-south divide: The two tales of world poverty. Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. United Nations. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Retrieved from the website of the United Nations https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol
  32. UNFCCC (2015). Paris Agreement. Retrieved from the website of the United Nations https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  33. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system (pp. 347–357). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, G. (1984). The conference on international economic cooperation (CIEC)1975–7. In Third-world political organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Willy Brandt School of Public PolicyUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations