Advertisement

Using an Online Format to Teach Graduate-Level Remote Sensing Basics

  • Mryka Hall-BeyerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

A small-enrolment graduate-level remote sensing course moved online in 2010, to solve timetabling problems without sacrificing preparation of students for an advanced seminar course. We also wanted qualitative indication of any change in resource and time commitment. The course was presented 8 times, serving 100 students. Two courseware systems and two laboratory software packages were used; upgrading for organization and content was continuous. Student outcomes are equivalent to the traditional course. Advantages include asynchronicity and personal agenda control. The course framework also permits students to complete the course as an independent study without synchronizing with the primary course. A modified flipped laboratory has been tried. Costs are in technical and administrative support. Most online course support assumes large lecture sections. This course’s success tests possible future directions at the institutional level. Learning Objects for advanced topics serve a small group of instructors linked by common institution or professional contact. Their relevance and wider availability await effective governance and accessibility of learning object repositories (LORs). It is not yet clear if there is a need for LORs for advanced technical material or if specialized webinars will better fulfill this function in a discipline heavily interdependent with major software development.

Keywords

Graduate education Learning object repositories Online learning Remote sensing 

References

  1. Chen, B., & Denoyelles, A. (2013). Exploring students’ mobile learning practices in higher education. Educase Review. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/-exploring-students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education
  2. Flagg, B. N. (1990, reprinted 2013). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Hall-Beyer, M. (2012). Online teaching of remote sensing: A technological nightmare or a technological fit? Canadian Association of Geographers annual meeting 2012, Waterloo, ON, May 28–June 2 2012. Abstract at www.cagacg.ca/files/pdf/agm/2012_AGM_program.pdf
  5. Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCS: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McGreal, R., Anderson, T., Bain, G., Downes, S., Friesen, N., Harrigan, K., Hatala, M., MacLeod, D., Mattson, M., Paquette, G., Richards, G., Roberts, T., & Schafer, S. (2004). EduSource: Canada’s learning object repository network International. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(3), http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_04/article01.htm
  9. Moore, A. S., & Simon, S. (2015). Globally networked teaching in the humanities. New York/London: Routledge. 239 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richards, G., McGreal, R., Hatala, M., & Friesen, N. (2002). The evolution of learn object repository technologies: Portals for on-line objects for learning. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 67–79.Google Scholar
  11. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual): A literature review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(5), A60–A68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wills, S., & Pegler, C. (2016). A deeper understanding of reuse: Learning designs, activities, resources and their context. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 10,  https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.405

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations