Advertisement

The Scrutiny of Brexit in National Parliaments: Germany, Luxembourg and the Czech Republic Compared

  • Vanessa Buth
  • Anna-Lena HögenauerEmail author
  • Petr Kaniok
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

The outcome of the Brexit referendum has led to a highly mediatized battle of power between the British government and parliament over how much influence the latter can exert over the British position in the negotiations with the European Union (EU). At the same time, the role of parliaments in the remaining member states has received virtually no public attention, despite the fact that the stakes are also high for their publics. The aim of our chapter is to shed light on dynamics of parliamentary control of Brexit in the remaining member states through a comparative study of the German, Czech and Luxembourgish parliaments. Each of these member states has one or several key interests at stake in the negotiations, such as exports, the financial sector and future contributions to the EU budget (Germany, Luxembourg), or migration to the UK and the maintenance of EU policies and their budgetary health (Czech Republic). The three cases represent geographical diversity and differently sized countries, to take into account different levels of governmental influence over the Brexit negotiations. The study will focus on the formal powers of parliaments, their actual mobilization and the key dynamics that mark their scrutiny of the Brexit negotiations.

Keywords

Brexit Parliaments Scrutiny Cooperation 

References

  1. Auel, K. (2005). Introduction: The Europeanization of Parliamentary Democracy. Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auel, K., & Christiansen, T. (2015). After Lisbon: National Parliaments in the European Union. West European Politics, 38(2), 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auel, K., & Höing, O. (2015). National Parliaments and the Eurozone Crisis: Taking Ownership in Difficult Times? West European Politics, 38(2), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auel, K., Oliver, R., & Tacea, A. (2015). Fighting Back? And, If So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 60–93). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bar Cendón, A. (2019). The Spanish Parliament and Brexit. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, G. (2019). The Irish Parliament and Brexit. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Bergman, T., Müller, W. C., Strøm, K., & Blomgren, M. (2003). Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-National Patterns. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies (pp. 109–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borońska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2019). The Polish Parliament and the Scrutiny of Brexit in Poland. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Brusenbauch Meislova, M. (2019). The European Parliament in the Brexit Process: Leading Role, Supporting Role or just a Small Cameo? In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee Minutes 24/06/2015.Google Scholar
  11. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee Minutes 14/10/2015.Google Scholar
  12. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee Minutes 17/12/2015.Google Scholar
  13. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee Minutes 17/2/2016.Google Scholar
  14. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee Minutes 15/9/2016.Google Scholar
  15. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Minutes 30/6/2016.Google Scholar
  16. Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Minutes 12/4/2017.Google Scholar
  17. COSAC. (2017, May 3). Twenty-Seventh Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny.Google Scholar
  18. Dimitrakopoulos, D. G. (2001). Incrementalism and Path Dependence: European Integration and Institutional Change in National Parliaments. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(3), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eleftheriadis, P. (2017). Constitutional Illegitimacy over Brexit. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gattermann, K., Högenauer, A.-L., & Huff, A. (2016). Research Note: Studying a New Phase of Europeanisation of National Parliaments. European Political Science, 15(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gee, G., & Young, A. L. (2016). Regaining sovereignty? Brexit, the UK Parliament and the Common Law. European Public Law, 22(1), 131–147.Google Scholar
  22. Högenauer, A.-L., & Neuhold, C. (2015). National Parliaments After Lisbon: Administrations on the Rise? West European Politics, 38(2), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Högenauer, A.-L., Neuhold, C., & Christiansen, T. (2016). Parliamentary Administrations in the European Union. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hrabálek, M., & Strelkov, A. (2015). The Czech Parliament and European Integration. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 494–513). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Interview with CDU 27/04/2018: Interview with Detlef Seif, CDU MP responsible for the reporting on the UK, Ireland and the art. 50 of the Treaty of the EU negotiations in the Bundestag EAC, April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
  26. Interview with Die LINKE 13/04/2018: Interview with René Jokisch, Europe Expert Responsible for the EAC and Brexit for Die LINKE Faction in the Bundestag, April 13, 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Interview with Ondřej Benešík, Chair of the Committee for EU Affairs, Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, 16/1/2018.Google Scholar
  28. Interview with One Employee, EU Affairs Department, Office of the Senate, 10/1/2018.Google Scholar
  29. Interview with SPD 19/04/2018: Interview with Axel Schäfer, SPD MP, Responsible for the Reporting on the UK and Brexit in the Bundestag EAC, April 19, 2018.Google Scholar
  30. Interview with the Bundestag Administration 19/04/2018: Interview with Dr. Sven Vollrath, Head of the Europe Sub-department of the German Bundestag Administration, April 19, 2018.Google Scholar
  31. Interview with Two Employees of the Parliamentary Institute, 10/1/2018.Google Scholar
  32. Interview with Václav Hampl, Chair of the Committee for EU Affairs, Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, 23/1/2018.Google Scholar
  33. Lippert, B., & Von Ondarza, N. (2016, July). Der Brexit als Neuland. SWP-Aktuell, 42.Google Scholar
  34. Lynch, P., Whitaker, R., & Cygan, A. (2019). Brexit and the UK Parliament: Challenges and Opportunities. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Mabbett, D. (2017). Parliamentary Sovereignty and Brexit. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maurer, A., & Wessels, W. (Eds.). (2001). National Parliaments on Their Ways to Europe. Losers or Latecomers? Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Norton, P. (Ed.). (1996). National Parliaments and the European Union. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  38. O’Brennan, J., & Raunio, T. (Eds.). (2007). National Parliaments Within the Enlarged European Union: From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Phillipson, G. (2016). A Dive into Deep Constitutional Waters: Article 50, the Prerogative and Parliament. Modern Law Review, 79(6), 1064–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poole, T. (2017). Devotion to Legalism: On the Brexit Case. Modern Law Review, 80(4), 696–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Resolution of Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic European Affairs Committee No. 394.Google Scholar
  42. Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Committee for EU Affairs Minutes 17/2/2016.Google Scholar
  43. Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Committee for EU Affairs Minutes 15/5/2016.Google Scholar
  44. Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Committee for EU Affairs Minutes 25/1/2016.Google Scholar
  45. Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Minutes 14/7/2016.Google Scholar
  46. Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Resolution No. 138.Google Scholar
  47. Sierens, V., & Brack, N. (2019). National and Regional Parliaments in the Context of Brexit: The Case of Belgium. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, J. (2019). Fighting to ‘Take Back Control’: The House of Lords and Brexit. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Spreitzer, A. (2014, July). Effects of European Integration on Parliamentary Control of Government: The Case of Luxembourg, 1999–2011 (PhD Thesis). University of Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  50. Thompson, L., & Yong, B. (2019). What Do We Mean by Parliamentary Scrutiny of Brexit? A View from the House of Commons. In T. Christiansen & D. Fromage (Eds.), Brexit and Democracy: The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Winzen, T. (2012). National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Comparison. West European Politics, 35(3), 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanessa Buth
    • 1
  • Anna-Lena Högenauer
    • 2
    Email author
  • Petr Kaniok
    • 3
  1. 1.University of East Anglia (UEA)NorwichUK
  2. 2.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  3. 3.Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations