Effect of Fe-Rich Intermetallics on Tensile Behavior of Al–Cu 206 Cast Alloys at Solid and Near-Solid States

  • K. LiuEmail author
  • X. Cao
  • A. Bolouri
  • X.-G. Chen
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Iron is one of the most common impurity elements in Al–Cu 206 cast alloys as it often causes the precipitation of Fe-rich intermetallic phases during solidification due to its extremely low solid solubility in aluminum. The characteristics of the Fe-rich intermetallics, such as type, morphology, size, and distribution, have significant influences on the tensile behaviors of the Al alloys. In the present work, two Al–Cu 206 cast alloys containing different types of Fe-rich intermetallics (dominated by either platelet β-Fe or Chinese script α-Fe) were cast and their tensile tests were performed at both solid (room temperature) and near-solid (2.8 vol. % liquid) states. It is found that the tensile properties in both solid and near-solid states are improved when the Fe-rich intermetallics change from platelet to Chinese script morphologies. During the solid-state tensile deformation, the failure occurs mainly along the platelet β-Fe intermetallics/Al matrix interface or within the Chinese script α-Fe particles. In the near-solid state, the alloy containing mainly Chinese script α-Fe is found to have more free flow paths for liquid feeding, leading to improved tensile properties. By contrast, the platelet β-Fe can cause the blockage of the liquid flow paths, leading to the degraded tensile properties and worsened susceptibility to hot-tearing.


Al–Cu alloy Fe-rich intermetallics Tensile properties Solid and near-solid state Hot-tearing 



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Rio Tinto Aluminum, through the NSERC Industry Research Chair in Metallurgy of Aluminum Transformation at the University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, and support of National Research Council of Canada.


  1. 1.
    Liu K, Cao X, Chen XG (2011) Solidification of iron-rich intermetallic phases in Al-4.5Cu-0.3Fe cast alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 42(7):2004–2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu K, Cao X, Chen XG (2012) Precipitation of iron-rich intermetallic phases in Al-4.6Cu-0.5Fe-0.5Mn cast alloy. J Mater Sci 47(10):4290–4298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamguo Kamga H, Larouche D, Bournane M, Rahem A (2010) Solidification of aluminum-copper B206 alloys with ion and silicon additions. Metall Mater Trans A 41(11):2844–2855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin B, Xu R, Li H, Zhang W (2018) Formation of Fe-rich intermetallics in Al–5.0Cu–0.5 Fe alloys with different Mn additions. Mater Sci Technol 34(12):1447–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seifeddine S, Johansson S, Svensson IL (2008) The influence of cooling rate and manganese content on the β-Al5FeSi phase formation and mechanical properties of Al–Si-based alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 490(1):385–390Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu K, Cao X, Chen XG (2012) Effect of Mn, Si, and cooling rate on the formation of iron-rich intermetallics in 206 Al-Cu cast alloys. Metall Mater Trans B 43(5):1231–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu K, Cao X, Chen XG (2013) Formation and phase selection of iron-rich intermetallics in Al-4.6Cu-0.5Fe cast alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 44(2):682–695Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eskin DG, Katgerman L (2004) Mechanical properties in the semi-solid state and hot tearing of aluminium alloys. Prog Mater Sci 49(5):629–711Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farup I, Drezet JM, Rappaz M (2001) In situ observation of hot tearing formation in succinonitrile-acetone. Acta Mater 49(7):1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamguo Kamga H, Larouche D, Bournane M, Rahem A (2010) Hot tearing of aluminum–copper B206 alloys with iron and silicon additions. Mater Sci Eng A 527(27):7413–7423Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bolouri A, Liu K, Chen X-G (2016) Effects of iron-rich intermetallics and grain structure on semisolid tensile properties of Al-Cu 206 cast alloys near solidus temperature. Metall Mater Trans A 47(12):6466–6480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolouri A, Chen X-G (2017) Tensile deformation behavior of Al-Cu 206 cast alloys near the solidus temperature. Mater Sci Forum 877:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colley LJ, Wells MA, Maijer DM (2004) Tensile properties of as-cast aluminum alloy AA5182 close to the solidus temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 386(1):140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fabrègue D, Deschamps A, Suery M, Drezet JM (2006) Non-isothermal tensile tests during solidification of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloys: Mechanical properties in relation to the phenomenon of hot tearing. Acta Mater 54(19):5209–5220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phillion AB, Hamilton RW, Fuloria D, Leung ACL, Rockett P, Connolley T, Lee PD (2011) In situ X-ray observation of semi-solid deformation and failure in Al–Cu alloys. Acta Mater 59(4):1436–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ScienceUniversity of Quebec at ChicoutimiChicoutimiCanada
  2. 2.Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Center, National Research Council CanadaMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations