Advertisement

Entrainment Defects in Cast Iron

  • Zakareya NashwanEmail author
  • W. D. Griffiths
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Castings were made of two types of cast iron, flake grey iron (FGI) and spheroidal graphite iron (SGI), in test bar moulds having both turbulent and quiescent filling systems. The different filling system designs did not seem to affect the scatter of values of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) in FGI. On the other hand, the turbulently filled moulds had increased scatter of UTS values in the case of the FGI more than in the case of the SGI. Slag particles and ternary eutectic phosphide defects were identified as responsible for the fracture of FGI test bars. Two types of defects, (classified as type I and II), symmetrical on either side of the fracture surfaces of tensile test bars, were found in the SGI test bars, but not the FGI test bars. Scanning electron microscopy and EDX analysis of defects suggested that type I was a thin film of magnesium silicate and type II consisted of folded-over carbon-rich films containing magnesium oxide. These defects are similar in form and structure to the double oxide film defects found in Al and Mg alloys.

Keywords

Cast iron Flake grey cast iron Spheroidal graphite cast iron Weibull Entrainment defects Bifilms Oxide films 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my sincere thanks to Mr. Adrian Caden for his careful assistance with the experimental work.

I would also like to extend my gratitude to Grainger and Worrall foundry represented by Tim Garwood and Keith Dunham for their continuous help in producing the castings and allowing me to join them for industrial training.

References

  1. 1.
    Harding RA (2006) Towards more reliable investment castings. Int J Cast Met Res 19(5):289–301.  https://doi.org/10.1179/136404606X153885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell J (2015) Complete casting handbook: metal casting processes, metallurgy, techniques and design, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, AmesterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths WD, Lai NW (2007) Double oxide film defects in cast magnesium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 38:190–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-9048-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Divandari M, Campbell J (2001) Mechanisms of bubble trail formation in castings. Transactions of American Foundry Society 109:433–442Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mirak AR, Divandari M, Boutorabi SMA, Taylor JA (2012) Effect of oxide film defects generated during mould filling on mechanical strength and reliability of magnesium alloy castings (AZ91). Int J Cast Met Res 25(3):188–194.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743133611Y.0000000037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green NR, Campbell J (1993) Statistical distributions of fracture strengths of cast Al7SiMg alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 173(1–2):261–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(93)90226-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell J (2007) Leakage defects via bubble trails in grey iron castings. Int J Metalcast 1(1):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell J (2006) Entrainment defects. Mater Sci Technol 22(2):127–145.  https://doi.org/10.1179/174328406X74248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsu F-Y, Wang K-N, Li C-L (2017) Bifilm defects in ductile-iron support bracket castings. Int J Cast Met Res 30(3):148–158.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13640461.2016.1273621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    BSI (2011) BS EN 1561:2011 founding. Grey cast irons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    BSI (2018) BS EN 1563:2018 founding. Spheroidal graphite cast irons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM International (2016) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materialsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tiryakioǧlu M, Hudak D (2011) Guidelines for two-parameter weibull analysis for flaw-containing materials. Metall Mater Trans B 42(6):1130–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-011-9556-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox M, Harding RA, Campbell J (2003) Optimised running system design for bottom filled aluminium alloy 2L99 investment castings. Mater Sci Technol 19(5):613–625.  https://doi.org/10.1179/026708303225002028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tiryakioǧlu M, Hudak D (2008) Unbiased estimates of the Weibull parameters by the linear regression method. J Mater Sci 43(6):1914–1919.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2457-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldstein J et al (2003) Scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis, 3rd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and MaterialsCollege of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations