Integrated Management for Capital Markets and Strategy: The Challenges of “Value” Versus “Values” Sustainability Investment, Smart Beta, and Their Consequences for Corporate Leadership

  • Andrew Mountfield
  • Matthew Gardner
  • Bernd Kasemir
  • Stephan Lienin
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


The discussion regarding sustainability strategy and reporting has largely focused on the integration of financial and non-financial data. However, a silent but dramatic revolution in financial asset management markets has occurred, as accounting for risk factors related to sustainability issues has become mainstream. To navigate these changes, companies must develop and align two integrated process loops. First, the information requirements of rating and ranking organisations, as well as the asset managers themselves, must be addressed. As increasingly sophisticated techniques, such as “smart beta” or “factor investment” are used to isolate specific ESG-related risk or opportunity factors, the demands placed on companies to steer, manage, and align information flows will increase. This will require a more active process than the current one-way information flow, which only satisfies rating and ranking data requirements, to more actively engage capital market actors in a dynamic dialogue. Second, an equally important and challenging process loop will integrate external and internal financial and non-financial objectives in a common, operational framework. This will facilitate multiple objectives throughout the organisation, driving alignment, focus on objectives, and robust reporting and feedback to highlight enterprise-wide value creation. These twin process loops require the attention of company leaders to ensure effective external communication and integrated management of strategy design and delivery.


Sustainability Integrated management Sustainable strategy Smart beta Capital markets Integrated reporting ESG Factor investing 


  1. Adams, S., & Simnett, R. (2011). Integrated reporting: An opportunity for Australia’s not-for-profit sector. Australia Accounting Review, 21(3), 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2017). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey (Working Paper, No. 17-079). Harvard Business School, February 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, R., Guenster, N., & Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardi, C. (2016). Integrated reporting: Insights, critical issues and future research agenda. Scuola Dottorale Internazionale. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rome.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stakeholder to the stockholder. Arabesque Partners, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  6. Cremers, K. J., & Nair, V. B. (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2859–2894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deloitte. (2017). Sustainable and smart beta. Performance Magazine, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Derwall, J., Gunster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2004). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2010). One report. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2015). The integrated reporting movement: Meaning, momentum, motives and materiality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, R., & Stroehle, J. (2018). Exploring social origins in the construction of ESG measures (Working Paper). Said Business School, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  14. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edmans, A., Li, L., & Zhang, C. (2014). Employee satisfaction, labor market flexibility, and stock returns around the world. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w20300.Google Scholar
  16. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Elkington, J. (2009). The holy grail of integrated reporting. Retrieved June 19, 2017, from
  18. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2009). Modern portfolio theory and financial analysis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009, December). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research.Google Scholar
  21. Flower, J. (2014). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives in Accounting. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FTSE Russell. (2017). Sustainable smart beta investing for institutional investors. London: Clear Path Analysis.Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, M. (2018). A comparison of 10-K and sustainability reporting (Sustainserv Working Paper).Google Scholar
  24. Golec, J. H. (1992). Empirical tests of a principal-agent model of the investor-investment advisor relationship. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomez, P., & Probst, G. (1995). Die Praxis des ganzheitlichen Problemlösens. Bern: Paul Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate-level strategy: Creating value in the multibusiness company. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The integrated reporting framework. London: IIRC.Google Scholar
  28. Kahn, R. N., & Lemmon, M. (2016). The asset manager’s dilemma. Financial Analysts Journal, 72(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kasemir, B., Süess, A., & Zehnder, J. B. (2001). The next unseen revolution: Pension fund investment and sustainability. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 43(9), 8–19.Google Scholar
  31. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2015). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality (HBS Working Paper).Google Scholar
  32. Kula, G., Raab, M., & Stahn, S. (2017). Beyond smart beta. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laville, J. (2017). Sustainable investments at institutional investors. In Handbook on sustainable investment. Zurich: CFA Research Institute Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
  35. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting, initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Möller, K., Wirnsperger, F., & Gackstatter, T. (2015). Performance management – Konzept, Erfahrungen und Ausgestaltung einer neuen Disziplin. Controlling, 27, 74–80.Google Scholar
  37. Mountfield, A. (2008). Strategische Planung zwischen Leadership und Prozessmanagement, Jahrbuch für Finanz- und Rechnungswesen. Zurich: WEKA Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Mountfield, A. (2009). Einführung, Von Strategy zu Steuerung. Zurich: Versus Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Nagy, Z., Kassam, A., & Lee, L. (2015). Can ESG add alpha? An analysis of ESG tilt and momentum strategies (MSCI Research paper).Google Scholar
  40. Owen, G. (2013). Integrated reporting: A review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education, 22(4), 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schulz, T. (2017). Corporate social responsibility und Unternehmenswert: Wirkungsmechanismen zwischen Strategie, Intangibles und Marktbewertung. In T. Wunder (Ed.), CSR und Strategisches Management. Wir man mit Nachhaltigkeit langfristig im Wettbewerb gewinnt. Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  42. Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds (corrected). Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015, March). How strategy unravels and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  44. Vargas, R. (2017). Great strategies need great delivery (Working Paper, Brightline Initiative).Google Scholar
  45. Wunder, T. (2016). Essentials of strategic management. Effective formulation and execution of strategy. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Zanker, A. (2017). The performance of sustainable investments. In Handbook on sustainable investment. Zurich: CFA Research Institute Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Mountfield
    • 1
  • Matthew Gardner
    • 2
  • Bernd Kasemir
    • 2
  • Stephan Lienin
    • 2
  1. 1.Mountfield Advisory, ETH Zurich, Ashridge Business SchoolZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Sustainserv Inc./GmbHBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations