Advertisement

Goal-Oriented Analysis and Design of Land Administration Systems

  • Christophe PonsardEmail author
  • Mounir Touzani
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 936)

Abstract

Land administration systems involve many complex processes in order to properly manage rights over land, estimate its value, gather related revenues and regulate its use. Reaching those goals generally relies on land registration and cadastre subsystems with many different variants observed across countries. Although elaborated domain models are available and are good at capturing the domain structure, they leave the design rationales quite implicit. This limits the understanding and reasoning capabilities on the systems, e.g. when some process do not correctly reach its goals. This paper proposes a way to extend such domain models with a goal dimension in order to provide a better guidance in the design of new systems and a better understanding of existing systems. Our approach is based on goal-oriented analysis techniques extended with specific spatio-temporal notations, patterns and decomposition rules.

References

  1. 1.
    UNECE: Land Administration Guidelines With Special Reference to Countries in Transition. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henssen, J.: Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In: Proceedings of Seminar Modern Cadastres and Cadastral Innovations, FIG Commission 7 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yavuz, A.: A comparative analysis of cadastral systems in the EU countries according to basic selected criteria. In: FIG Working Week (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuladhar, A.: Reengineering cadastre and land registration systems and business opportunities. In: FIG Working Week and 125th Anniversary, Still on the Frontline, 13–17 April, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dale, P., McLaughlin, J.: Land Administration. Spatial Information Systems Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hespanha, J., da Fonseca Hespanha de Oliveira, J., van Oosterom, P., Zevenbergen, J.: Development methodology for an integrated legal cadastre: deriving Portugal country profile from the land administration domain model. NCG (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enemark, S., et al.: Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration: Joint FIG. FIG, San Francisco (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asiama, S., et al.: Tools to support transparency in land administration, Training package: Toolkit. UN-HABITAT (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williamson, I.P.: Best practices for land administration systems in developing countries. World Bank Other Operational Studies 16732, The World Bank (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ponsard, C., Touzani, M.: Extending land administration domain models with a goal perspective. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM), 27–28 April, Porto, Portugal (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zakout, W., Wehrmann, B., Torhonen, M.P.: Good government in land administration principles and good practices. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) World Bank, Rome (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Oosterom, P., Lemmen, C.: Proposal to establish a core cadastral data model. In: 3rd International Workshop ‘Towards a Cadastral Core Domain Model’ of COST action G9 ‘Modelling Real Property Transactions’, 10–12 October, Delft (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lemmen, C., Oosterom, P.V.: Version 1.0 of the FIG core cadastral domain model. In: Proceedings of XXIII FIG Congress Shaping the Change, Munich, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Oosterom, P., et al.: The core cadastral domain model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 30, 627–660 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO: 19152 - Geographic information - Land Administration Domain Model (2012). http://www.iso.org
  17. 17.
    Lemmen, C., van Oosterom, P., Bennett, R.: The land administration domain model. Land Use Policy 49, 535–545 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christl, A., et al.: Standard open source software for the social tenure domain. In: Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    GLTN: Social Tenure Domain Model - a pro poor land information tool (2014). http://stdm.gltn.net
  20. 20.
    Williamson, I., Ting, L., Grant, D.: The evolving role of land administration in support of sustainable development. Aust. Surveyor 44, 126–135 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: Enterprise modelling for business redesign: the I* framework. SIGGROUP Bull. 18, 59–63 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ITU: Recommendation Z.151 (10/12), User Requirements Notation (URN) - Language Definition (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Lamsweerde, A., Letier, E.: Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 26, 978–1005 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Respect-IT: KAOS meta-model (2005). http://www.respect-it.com
  26. 26.
    Touzani, M., Ponsard, C.: Towards modelling and analysis of spatial and temporal requirements. In: 24th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bédard, Y., Larrivée, S.: Modeling with pictogrammic languages. In: Shekar, S., Xiong, H. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Sciences, pp. 716–725. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Respect-IT: The objectiver requirements engineering tool (2005). http://www.respect-it.com
  29. 29.
    Enemark, S.: Land administration infrastructures for sustainable development. Property Manag. 19, 366–383 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zevenbergen, J.: A systems approach to land registration and cadastre. Nordic J. Surv. Real Estate Res. 1(1), 1–10 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bogaerts, T., Zevenbergen, J.: Cadastral systems - alternatives. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 25, 325–337 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vries, W.T.D., Wouters, R., Laarakker, P.M.: Land registration and cadastre, one or two agencies? In: Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 14–18 March, Washington D.C. (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fetai, B.: Analysing the effects of merging land registration and cadastre. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC) (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    UNESCAP: What is good governance? (2009). http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
  35. 35.
    OMG: UML - Unified Modelling Language - Version 2.5 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML
  36. 36.
    Tuladhar, A.M.: Why is unified modeling language (UML) for cadastral systems? M.Sc. University of Twente (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sladic, D., Radulovic, A., Govedarica, M., Jovanovic, D., Przulj, D.: The use of ontologies in cadastral systems. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 12, 1033–1053 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., Smith, B.: A spatio-temporal ontology for geographic information integration. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 23, 765–798 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jensen, M.: Sustainable development goals interface ontology. In: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology and BioCreative (ICBO BioCreative 2016) (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dechesne, B., Delannay, G., Massonet, P.: Agora project: requirements analyse for the creation of an unified cadastral database (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    EU PCC: Cadastral Information System, a Resource for the E.U. Policies. Overview of the Cadastral Systems of the E.U. Member States - Part I-II-III (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CETIC Research CenterCharleroiBelgium
  2. 2.Académie de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations