Resisting Sexual Violence: What Empathy Offers

  • Sarah Clark MillerEmail author
Part of the Library of Public Policy and Public Administration book series (LPPP, volume 12)


The primary aim of this essay is to investigate modalities of resistance to sexual violence. It begins from the observation that the nature of what we understand ourselves to be resisting—that is, how we define the scope, content, and causes of sexual violence—will have profound implications for how we approach the possibilities of resistance. I critically engage one model of resistance to sexual violence: feminist philosophical scholarship on self-defense, highlighting several shortcomings in how the feminist self-defense discourse inadvertently frames sexual violence. Holding these criticisms in mind, I expand the landscape of resistance to sexual violence by considering new possibilities that empathy might offer. The work of two contemporary women of color feminists—Roxane Gay and Tarana Burke—launches further exploration of empathy’s alternative modes of resistance. In focusing on empathy between survivors of sexual violence, we can expand our understanding of the possibilities of resistance by redistributing and broadening our attention in three main ways: from action to affect and attitude, from a spatially and temporally limited event to something more expansive, and from the individual through the interpersonal to the structural.


  1. Bailey, Alison. 2008. On Intersectionality, empathy, and feminist solidarity. Peace and Justice Studies 18 (2): 14–36.Google Scholar
  2. Bratman, Michael E. 2014. Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against our will: Women, men, and rape. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, Tarana. 2018. Lecture at The Pennsylvania State University. State College, PA. March 22, 2018.Google Scholar
  5. Burrow, Sylvia. 2009. Bodily limits to autonomy: Emotion, attitude, and self-defence. In Embodiment and agency, ed. Letitia Meynell, Sue Campbell, and Susan Sherwin, 126–142. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2012. Protecting one’s commitments: Integrity and self-defense. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahill, Ann J. 2001. Rethinking rape. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2009. In defense of self-defense. Philosophical Papers 38 (3): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CBS News. 2017. Me Too’ creator Tarana Burke: ‘We have to make movements ourselves’, October 20. Accessed 25 May 2018.
  10. Ferguson, Ann. 2009. Feminist paradigms of solidarity and justice. Philosophical Topics 37 (2): 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gay, Roxane. 2018. Introduction. In Not that bad: Dispatches from rape culture, ed. Roxane Gay, ix–xii. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, Margaret. 1990. Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemmings, Clare. 2012. Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffmann, Martin. 2000. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollander, Jocelyn A. 2004. ‘I can take care of myself’: The impact of self-defense training on women’s lives. Violence Against Women 11: 776–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2016. The importance of self-defense training for sexual violence prevention. Feminism and Psychology 26 (2): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Locurto, Tina. 2018. How did she go from a tiny blurb to Time magazine’s front cover? Centre Daily Times. Accessed 25 May 2018.
  18. MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marcus, Sharon. 1993. Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, 385–403. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Mardorossian, Carine M. 2003. Review of Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault, Rethinking Rape and New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. Signs 29 (1): 265–269.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, Susan E. 2002. Review of rethinking Rape. Violence Against Women 8 (7): 901–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCaughey, Martha. 1997. Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. 2018. Perpetrators of sexual violence: Statistics. Accessed 1 June 2018.
  24. Rodino-Colocino, Michelle. 2018. Me too, #MeToo: Countering cruelty with empathy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15 (1): 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santiago, Cassandra, and Doug Criss. 2017. An activist, a little girl and the heartbreaking origin of ‘me too’. Accessed 25 May 2018.
  26. Weitlauf, Julie, Ronald Smith, and Daniel Cervone. 2000. Generalization effects of coping-skills training: Influence of self-defense training on women’s efficacy beliefs, assertiveness, and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (4): 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zack, Naomi. 2005. Inclusive feminism: A third wave theory of women’s commonality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations