Advertisement

Introduction: Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography

  • R. Malatesha JoshiEmail author
  • Catherine McBride
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 17)

Abstract

The authors provide a summary of the chapters from the handbook on literacy on different aksharas from the Indic writing system

Keywords

Akshara orthography Assessment Indian subcontinent Instruction Literacy Reading Spelling 

References

  1. Coltheart, M. (1984). Writing systems and reading disorders. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading (pp. 67–80). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Coward, H. G., & Raja, K. K. (1990). Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies (Vol. V). New Delhi, India: Motilal Banraasidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2017). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2018), 101–116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1379082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Karanth, P. (2006). The kagunita of Kannada – Learning to read and write an Indian alphasyllabary. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 389–404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Katz, L., & Frost, L. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00329.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakamura, P. R., Joshi, R. M., & Ji, X. (2018). Investigating the asymmetrical roles of syllabic and phonemic awareness in akshara processing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221941771820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rimzhim, A., Katz, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2014). Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic. Writing Systems Research, 6, 41–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.855618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Share, D., & Daniels, P. (2016). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz, and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8, 17–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sweet, R. W. (2004). The big picture: Where we are nationally on the reading front and how we got there. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 13–44). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  13. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2015). Education for all (EFA) global report. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture, College of Education and Human DevelopmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations