Advertisement

Mutual Attitudes, Stereotypes and Prejudices Towards the Neighboring Country and Perceptions of the Polish-German Border

  • Marius MayerEmail author
  • Wojciech Zbaraszewski
  • Dariusz Pieńkowski
  • Gabriel Gach
  • Johanna Gernert
Chapter
Part of the Geographies of Tourism and Global Change book series (GTGC)

Abstract

This chapter begins the presentation of the results of the representative online survey by addressing respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics, with a first focus on the differences between the Polish and German samples. The main content revolves around the mutual attitudes, stereotypes and prejudices towards the neighboring country as expressed on the survey. After discussing mutual interests, sympathy, knowledge and fascination, discussion centers on the unaided associations of Poles and Germans with their respective neighboring country/people, followed by more standardized image perceptions and attitudes towards those neighbors. Finally, we explore the level of prejudices and stereotypes that we sought to measure under avoidance of too much social desirability. Our results reveal that, while Poles and Germans in the border region do not know very much about each other, in general they think rather positively about one another. Nevertheless, we confirm the existence of persistent (negative) stereotypes and prejudices and underline the validity of the contact hypothesis, which posits that respondents who have visited the neighboring country show more positive attitudes and fewer negative prejudices. Finally, we present respondents’ perceptions of the Polish-German border itself that, it turns out, is not generally seen as a barrier but perceived as quite natural and non-disturbing.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Baloglu, S., & Brinberg, D. (1997). Affective images of tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 35(4), 11–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759703500402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. (1999). A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 868–897.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Central Statistical Office of Poland [GUS]. (2016a). Statystyczne Vademecum Samorządowca. Miasto Szczecin. Szczecin, Poland: Urząd Statystyczny.Google Scholar
  4. Central Statistical Office of Poland [GUS]. (2016b). Statystyczne Vademecum Samorządowca. Województwo lubuskie. Zielona Góra, Poland: Urząd Statystyczny.Google Scholar
  5. Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, B. J. R. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2), 2–12.Google Scholar
  6. Gartner, W. C. (1993). Image formation process. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2(2–3), 191–216.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v02n02_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ISP. (2016). Barometr Polska - Niemcy 2016. Polacy i Niemcy o sobie nawzajem 25 lat po podpisaniu Traktatu o dobrym sąsiedztwie i przyjaznej współpracy. Warszawa, Poland: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.Google Scholar
  8. Lopes, S. D. F. (2011). Destination image: Origins, developments and implications. PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 9, 305–315.Google Scholar
  9. Pearce, P. L. (2005). Tourist behaviour. Themes and conceptual schemes. Clevedon, England: Channel View.Google Scholar
  10. Polskatimes. (2016, December 21). Niemcy: Zamach na Breitscheidplatz w Berlinie. Ciężarówka wjechała w ludzi na jarmarku świątecznym. Retrieved December 10, 2017 from http://www.polskatimes.pl/fakty/swiat/a/niemcy-zamach-na-breitscheidplatz-w-berlinie-ciezarowka-wjechala-w-ludzi-na-jarmarku-swiatecznym,11596800.
  11. Statistisches Bundesamt [Destatis]. (2017). Bevölkerung (31.12.2015). Retrieved December 10, 2017 from https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/LaenderRegionen/Regionales/Regionaldaten.html.
  12. Tasci, A. D. A., & Gartner, W. C. (2007). Destination image and its functional relationships. Journal of Travel Research, 45, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van den Broek, J., Van der Velde, M., & ten Berge, H. (2015). Nullmessung des Ergebnisindikators der Priorität 2. Wahrnehmung der deutsch-niederländischen Grenze als Barriere. Retrieved December 10, 2017 from https://www.deutschland-nederland.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/150619_Nullmessung_de.pdf.
  14. Wprost. (2016, December 21). Anis A. podejrzany o przeprowadzenie zamachu w Berlinie. Kilka miesięcy wcześniej miał zostać wydalony z Niemiec. Retrieved December 10, 2017 from https://www.wprost.pl/swiat/10035869/Anis-A-podejrzany-o-przeprowadzenie-zamachu-w-Berlinie-Kilka-miesiecy-wczesniej-mial-zostac-wydalony-z-Niemiec.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marius Mayer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wojciech Zbaraszewski
    • 2
  • Dariusz Pieńkowski
    • 3
  • Gabriel Gach
    • 4
  • Johanna Gernert
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geography and GeologyUniversität GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
  2. 2.Department of System Analysis and FinanceWest Pomeranian University of TechnologySzczecinPoland
  3. 3.University of Life Sciences in PoznańPoznańPoland
  4. 4.LVR-Kulturzentrum Abtei BrauweilerLandschaftsverband Rheinland (LVR)PulheimGermany

Personalised recommendations