Advertisement

Re-introducing Life History Methodology: An Equitable Social Justice Approach to Research in Education

  • James S. Wright
Chapter

Abstract

Educational researchers who are mindful of social justice are suggested to consider contemporary research methodologies’ historical alignment with colonization: Expansion and the ensuing epistemicide. This chapter argues that life history methodology can be used as a counter to traditional research methodologies and provides space to collect and analyze data in a way that counters past traditions. Contemporary educational research methodologies and methods are replete with historical baggage so pronounced that social justice advocates can, unwittingly, engage in research methods that reify the harms that they seek to counter. Life history provides real opportunities for educational researchers to develop new knowledge by listening to and validating the experiences of the most vulnerable populations. Life history challenges the idea of a universal truth—stemming from Eurocentric positionalities.

References

  1. Anzaldúa, G. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  2. Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Saskatoon, Canada: Purich Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Clough, P. T. (1992). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Curry, T. J. (2017). The man-not: Race, class, genre, and the dilemmas of black manhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. K. (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research: 1st (first) edition (G. Morgan, Ed.). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Dhunpath, R. (2000). Life history methodology: “Narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 543–551.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gage, N. (1989). The Paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018007004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodson, I. (1992). Studying teachers’ lives (Reprint ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodson, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gramling, L., & Carr, R. (2004). Lifelines: A life history methodology. Nursing Research, 53(3), 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). Reconstructing teacher education (J. Elliott, Ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Howe, K. R. (2009). Isolating science from the humanities: The third dogma of educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(4), 766–784.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, G. R. (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Khalifa, M. (2015). Can Blacks be racists? Black-on-Black principal abuse in an urban school setting. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(2), 259–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  16. McAdams, D. (2008). The life story interview: Foley Center: Northwestern University [The Foley Center: School of Education and Social Policy Northwestern University]. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/foley/instruments/interview/
  17. Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mignolo, W. (2012). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. President & Fellows Harvard University. (2008). Emic & etic § Q: Foundations of qualitative research in education [Harvard Education]. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=qualitative&pageid=icb.page340911
  20. Sharp, J. (2008). Geographies of postcolonialism. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  22. de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Spivak CanTheSubalternSpeak.pdf. Retrieved from http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~sj6/Spivak%20CanTheSubalternSpeak.pdf
  24. Stein, S. J. (2004). The culture of education policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Tadajewski, M. (2009). The debate that won’t die? Values incommensurability, antagonism and theory choice. Organization, 16(4), 467–485.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508409104504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Willinsky, J. (2000). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end (1st ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Witherell, C., & Noddings, N. (1991). Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wright, J. (2017). School leadership in dirty water: Black and Minoritized perspectives on mayoral control and turnaround in Waterbury, CT 2011–2016. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC.Google Scholar
  29. Young, R. (2004). White mythologies: Writing history and the west (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Wright
    • 1
  1. 1.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations