Advertisement

Through Their Eyes, in Their Words: Using Photo-Elicitation to Amplify Student Voice in Policy and School Improvement Research

  • Jeff WallsEmail author
  • Samantha E. Holquist
Chapter

Abstract

Although various measures of student success are often used as data points in scholarly and policy debates about how to improve schools, the policy and school-level changes that stem from these discussions are presumed to be taken on behalf of students without very much effort to meaningfully include students’ perspectives on the proposed changes. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the promise of photo-elicitation-based data collection to authentically leverage student voice in research on policy and school improvement in ways that promote equity and critical social justice. Photo-elicitation, in its simplest form, involves inviting research participants to take photographs of a space (e.g., a school) under a broad prompt (e.g., places where you like to have fun) (Harper, Visual Studies, 17, 13–26, 2002; Torre & Murphy, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 2015). This chapter highlights methodological choices researchers must make in utilizing photo-elicitation and how these choices bear on the equity implications of this method.

References

  1. Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York, NY: Academy of Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1943.45.4.02a00120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–11). London, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2010). Participatory action research for high school students: Transforming policy, practice, and the personal with social justice education. Education Policy, 25(3), 488–506.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904810361722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2013). Handbook for participatory action research, planning, and evaluation. Ottawa, ON: SES2 Dialogue.Google Scholar
  6. Clark-Ibanez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1507–1527.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204266236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59, 843–859.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, I., Stevens, B., McKeever, P., & Baruchel, S. (2006). Photo-elicitation interview (PEI): Using photos to elicit children’s perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harper, D. (1998). An argument for visual sociology. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 24–41). London, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, M., & Yonezawa, S. (2002). Student voice, cultural change: Using inquiry in school reform. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(3), 245–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680290175257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jurkowski, J. M. (2008). Photovoice as participatory action research tool for engaging people with intellectual disabilities in research and program development. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2008)46[1:PAPART]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lapenta, F. (2012). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London, UK: Sage Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitra, D. L. (2014). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522–543.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209334577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodriquez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 123, 19–34.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600584207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Torre, D., & Murphy, J. (2015). A different lens: Using photo-elicitation interviews in education research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, Article 111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, C. C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Louisiana at LafayetteLafayetteUSA
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations