Advertisement

Design and Analysis of Core Design for Small Modular Reactors

  • Bahman Zohuri
Chapter

Abstract

The pronuclear energy and advocates are lobbying that the sustainable development of the world’s energy sector cannot be achieved without extensive use of nuclear energy and the advantages of nuclear-related technologies, including upcoming new generation of the Small Modular Reactors in near future horizon. The dawn of these SMRs requires new design and analysis no matter if they are falling into Light Water Reactor (LWR), pressurized water reactor (PWR), or even multi-application small light water reactor (MASLWR) categories, depending on the vendor involved with these new technologies and consequently safety standards and their nonproliferation requirements as well. This chapter visits these standards for core design and generally elaborated on them with understanding that readers need to refer just beyond this book and this chapter for more details.

References

  1. 1.
    Zohuri, B. (2015). Combined cycle driven efficiency for next generation nuclear power plants: An innovative design approach (1st ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zohuri, B., & McDaniel, P. (2017). Combined cycle driven efficiency for next generation nuclear power plants: An innovative design approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zohuri, B. (2018). Small modular reactors as renewable energy sources. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zohuri, B., McDaniel, P., & De Oliveira, C. (2015). Advanced nuclear open-air-Brayton cycles for highly efficient power conversion. Nuclear Technology Journal.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zohuri, B. (2017). Thermal-hydraulic analysis of nuclear reactors (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walter, A. E. (1981). Fast breeder reactors. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soldatov, A. (2009). Design and analysis of a nuclear reactor core for innovative small light water reactors. A Dissertation Submitted to Oregon State University, March 9, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leppänen, J. (2005). NEW ASSEMBLY-LEVEL MONTE CARLO NEUTRON TRANSPORT CODE FOR REACTOR PHYSICS CALCULATIONS. In Mathematics and Computation, Supercomputing, Reactor Physics and Nuclear and Biological Applications Palais des Papes, Avignon, France, September 12–15, 2005, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nuclear Energy Association (NEA). (2011, June). Current status, technical feasibility and economics of small modular reactors.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kozlowski, T., & Downar, T. J. (2003, December). OECD/NEA AND U.S. NRC PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. (1999). IAEA-TECDOC-1117. Evolutionary water-cooled reactors: Strategic issues, technologies and economic viability. In Proceedings of a Symposium, Seoul, 30 November–4 December 1998. Vienna: IAEA. ISSN 1011-4289.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingersoll, D. T., & Poore, W. P., III. (2007). Reactor technology options study for near-term deployment of GNEP grid-appropriate reactors. ORNL/TM-2007/157, ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN, September 26, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    2005 World nuclear industry handbook. (2005). Nuclear Engineering International.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IAEA CSP-14 (Parts 1–5). (2002). Small and medium sized reactors: Status and prospects. In Proceeding of International Seminar, Cairo, Egypt, May 27–31, 2001. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IAEA PUB 1280. (2006). Operating experience with nuclear power stations in member states in 2005. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nuclear energy today. Nuclear development. NEA/OECD. (2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants (Vol. 1: Main policies and objectives. Revision C, EUR-Club, 2001). Chapter 1-6 with list of acronyms and definitions section.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants (Vol. 2: Generic nuclear island requirements. Revision C, EUR-Club, 2001). Chapter 0-19 with list of acronyms and definitions section annexes.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants (Vol. 3: Application of EUR to the specific projects. Revision C, EUR-Club, 2001). Chapter 0-19 with list of acronyms and definitions section, annexes.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants (Vol. 4: Generic conventional island requirements. Revision B, EUR-Club, 2000). Chapter 0-19 with list of acronyms and definitions section annexes.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    10 CFR Part 52. Domestic licenses, certifications, and approvals for nuclear power plants. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Electronic Publication. Retrieved from http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part052/.
  22. 22.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. (2006). IAEA-TECDOC-1485. Status of innovative small and medium sized reactor designs 2005. Reactors with conventional refueling schemes. Vienna: IAEA. ISSN 1011-4289.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    IAEA. (2007). Progress in design and technology development for innovative small and medium sized reactors. In Proceeding of IAEA 51st General Conference, September 17, 2007. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    IAEA. (2007). Current trends in nuclear fuel for power reactors. In Proceeding of IAEA 51st General Conference, September 17, 2007. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. (2004). IAEA-TECDOC-1391. Status of advanced light water reactor designs 2004. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). IAEA-TECDOC-1290. Improving economics and safety of water-cooled reactors: Proven means and new approaches. Vienna: IAEA. ISSN 1011-4289.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kupitz, J., Bussurin, Y., & Gowin, P. Considerations related to specific concepts: Water-cooled reactors, gas-cooled reactors, metal-cooled reactors, non-conventional reactors. Retrieved from http://www.mi.infn.it/~landnet/Doc/Reactors/kupitz.pdf.
  28. 28.
    IAEA. (2003). Overview of global development of advanced nuclear power plants. Annex 1 (pp. 1094–1110). Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    IAEA. (2006). IAEA overview of global development of advanced nuclear power plants. Information NPTDS brochure. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guerrini, B., & Paci, S. (1998). Lessons on nuclear plants part IIB: Advanced reactors. Training materials, RL (811) 99, University of Pisa.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fisher, J. E., Modro, S. M., Weaver, K. D., Reyes, J. N., Jr., Groome, J. T., & Bapka, P. (2001). Performance and safety studies for Multi-Application, Small, Light Water Reactor (MASLWR). In Proceedings of RELAP5 International Users Seminar, Sun Valley, ID, September 5–7, 2001.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fisher, J. E., Modro, S. M., Weaver, K. D., Reyes, J. N., Jr., Groome, J. T., & Bapka, P. (2002). Performance and safety studies for Multi-Application, Small, Light Water Reactor (MASLWR). In Proceedings of RELAP5 International Users Seminar, Park City, UT, September 4–6, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Modro, S. M., Fisher, J. E., Weaver, K. D., Reyes, J. N., Jr., Groome, J. T., Bapka, P., & Wilson, G. (2002). Generation-IV Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR). In 10th International Conference on Nuclear Energy, INEEL/CON-02-00017, April 14, 2002.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Modro, S. M., Fisher, J. E., Weaver, K. D., Reyes, J. N., Jr., Groome, J. T., Bapka, P., & Carlson, T. M. (2003, December). Multi-application small light water reactor final report. INEEL/EXT-04-01626.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reyes, J. N., Groome, J., Woods, B. G., Young, E., Abel, K., Yao, Y., & Yoo, Y. J. (2007). Testing of the Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR) passive safety systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, 1999–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Woods, B. G., Reyes, J. N., & Wu, Q. (2005). Flow stability testing under natural circulation conditions in integral type reactors. Presentation at IAEA Natural Circulation Research Coordination Meeting, Corvallis, OR, September 1, 2005.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soldatov, A., Marcum, W., Magedanz, J., Nelson, K., & Dahl, J. (2007, March). Advanced thermal accessible reactor final report. Course NE 574—Design Project Report, OSU.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Soldatov, A., Magedanz, J., & Dahl, J. (2007, June). MASLWR extended core live design and preliminary instrumentation. Course NE 575—Design Project Report, OSU.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Galvin, M., & Soldatov, A. (2007, March). Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR), Global Viability. Course ECE599—Design Project Report, OSU.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of New Mexico, Galaxy Advanced Engineering, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations