Advertisement

The Discourse of Stress: Individual Pathology or Communal Ritual

  • Sheila McNameeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the ways in which a constructionist emphasis on language and embodied activities draws attention to our own participation in maintaining and validating the discourse of stress and the concomitant evaluations that accompany it. The relational focus of the constructionist discourse offers various resources for creating ways of getting on together (Wittgenstein). Discursive options provide resources for action that move us beyond pathology to potential. These resources include specific ways of inviting others to appreciate alternatives, imagine the future, adopt their stories, coordinate multiple beliefs and views, create opportunities for different conversations, and embrace relational responsibility. She studies how such resources transform one’s professional life. Is stress something we “get” or “catch” or “become caught up in?” Or, is stress a way of talking? Our culture has accustomed us to a number of labels, categories, and diagnoses of deficit. We systematically face problems, or threats we might impose upon ourselves or others, or assessments that might affect our future.

References

  1. Alexander, B. (2008). The globalization of addiction: A study in poverty of the spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, B. K., Beyerstein, B. L., Hadaway, P. F., & Coambs, R. B. (1981). The effect of early and later colony housing on oral ingestion of morphine in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 15, 571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Averill, J. R. (1989). Stress as fact and artifact: An inquiry into the social origins and functions of some stress reactions. In C. D. Spielberger, I. G. Sarason, & J. Strelau (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 12, pp. 15–38). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1972). Archeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  7. Fruggeri, L., & McNamee, S. (1991). Burnout as social process: A research study. In L. Fruggeri, U. Telfner, A. Castellucci, M. Marzari, & M. Matteini (Eds.), A systemic model for changing mental health service delivery (pp. 1–16). London: Draper Campbell Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hari, J. (2015). Chasing the scream: The first and last days of the war on drugs. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  10. Iacovides, A., Fountoulakis, K. N., Kaprinis, S., & Kaprinis, G. (2003). The relationship between job stress, burnout and clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75(3), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McNamee, S. (1996). The discourse of burnout: Social constructionist inquiry. In M. Pakman (Ed.), Construcciones de la experiencia humana (Vol. 2). Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial.Google Scholar
  12. McNamee, S. (2002). The social construction of disorders: From pathology to potential. In J. D. Raskin & S. K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 143–168). New York: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
  13. McNamee, S. (2014). Research as relational practice: Exploring modes of inquiry. In G. Simon & A. Chard (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research (pp. 74–94). London: Everything is Connected Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pearce, W. B. (2007). Making social worlds: A communication perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England 1869–1939. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Szasz, T. (1984). The therapeutic state: Psychiatry in the mirror of current events. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations