Advertisement

Node Importance Analysis of a Gas Transmission Network with Evaluation of a New Infrastructure by ProGasNet

  • Pavel PraksEmail author
  • Vytis Kopustinskas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11260)

Abstract

We present a probabilistic approach for identification and ranking of important gas network components from the security of supply point of view. We perform a probabilistic risk analysis of a regional European gas transmission network under selected attack scenarios. Moreover, in order to evaluate security of supply consequences of a new gas infrastructure project, this analysis is performed twice: before and after the infrastructure project. The results of 1 million of Monte-Carlo simulations under the attack scenarios clearly indicate various gas supply consequences. Thus, the obtained list of most critical components includes suitable candidates for the protection of infrastructure.

Keywords

Gas transmission network modelling Network reliability Network resilience Monte-Carlo methods 

References

  1. 1.
    EU Regulation: Regulation No. 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 concerning measures to safeguard security of gas supply and repealing Council Directive 2004/67/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L295, 53, 1–22 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EU Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2017 concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010. Official Journal of the European Union, L 280/1, 60, 1–57 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Praks, P., Kopustinskas, V., Masera, M.: Probabilistic modelling of security of supply in gas networks and evaluation of new infrastructure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 144, 254–264 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kopustinskas, V., Praks, P.: Bottleneck analysis of the gas transmission network using ProGasNet simulator. In: ESREL 2015, pp. 1259–1266 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Praks, P., Kopustinskas, V.: Identification and ranking of important elements in a gas transmission network by using ProGasNet. In: ESREL 2016, pp. 1573–1579 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Praks, P., Kopustinskas, V., Masera, M.: Monte-Carlo-based reliability and vulnerability assessment of a natural gas transmission system due to random network component failures. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. 2(3), 97–107 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deo, N.: Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering with Computer Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Todinov, M.T.: The same sign local effects principle and its applications for risk reduction. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 9(4), 311–329 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rømo, F., Tomasgard, A., Hellemo, L., Fodstad, M.: Optimizing the Norwegian natural gas production and transport. Interfaces 39(1), 46–56 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Borst, M., Schoonakker, H.: An overview of PSA importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(3), 241–245 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00007-2. ISSN 0951-8320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aven, T., Østebø, R.: Two new component importance measures for a flow network system. Reliab. Eng. 14(1), 75–80 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(86)90091-0. ISSN 0143-8174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Rocco, C.M.: Resilience-based network component importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 117, 89–97 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.012. ISSN 0951-8320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Coit, D.W.: Composite importance measures for multi-state systems with multi-state components. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 54(3), 517–529 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    EGIG report: 8th Report of the European gas pipeline incident data group; Groninge (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Senderov, S.M., Edelev, A.V.: Formation of a list of critical facilities in the gas transportation system of Russia in terms of energy security. Energy, 10 November 2017 (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.063
  16. 16.
    Vesely, W.E., et al.: Measures of risk importance and their applications, NUREG/CR-3385 (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Energy, Transport and Climate, Energy Security, Distribution and Market UnitIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations