Biopolymers-Based Nanocomposites: Properties and Applications

  • Naruemon Sumrith
  • Sanjay Mavinkere RangappaEmail author
  • Rapeephun Dangtungee
  • Suchart Siengchin
  • Mohammad Jawaid
  • Catalin Iulian Pruncu


The actual environmental policy, together with the strong interest to develop novel materials with better performances, makes the new eco-friendly and biodegradable composites a very attractive research field. Additionally, in this branch of composite materials, substantial attention is focused on the biopolymers made from “nanocomposites” particles that were considered both at academic level and industrial plant. The biopolymer-based nanocomposites provide an opportunity to replace the conventional non-biodegradable polymers, due to their user-friendliness, great biodegradability, and relatively good mechanical properties. This chapter contains a robust overview of a new class of biopolymers nanocomposites.


Biopolymers Nanocomposites Blends Properties Application 


  1. Abdollahi M, Alboofetileh M, Behrooz R, Rezaei M, Miraki R (2013) Reducing water sensitivity of alginate bio-nanocomposite film using cellulose nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 54:166–173Google Scholar
  2. Abral H, Anugrah AS, Hafizulhaq F, Handayani D, Sugiarti E, Muslimin AN (2018) Effect of nanofibers fraction on properties of the starch based biocomposite prepared in various ultrasonic powers. Int J Biol Macromol 116:1214–1221Google Scholar
  3. Bajpai P (1999) Application of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry. Biotechnol Prog 15(2):147–157Google Scholar
  4. Bibi F, Guillaume C, Gontard N, Sorli B (2017) Wheat gluten, a bio-polymer to monitor carbon dioxide in food packaging: electric and dielectric characterization. Sens Actuators B Chem 250:76–84Google Scholar
  5. Bordes P, Pollet E, Avérous L (2009) Nano-biocomposites: biodegradable polyester/nanoclay systems. Prog Polym Sci 34(2):125–155Google Scholar
  6. Chaunier L, Guessasma S, Belhabib S, Valle GD, Lourdin D, Leroy E (2017) Material extrusion of plant biopolymers: opportunities & challenges for 3D printing. Addit Manufact 21:220–233Google Scholar
  7. Davachi SM, Heidari BS, Hejazi I, Seyfi J, Oliaei E, Farzaneh A, Rashedi H (2017) Interface modified polylactic acid/starch/poly ε-caprolactone antibacterial nanocomposite blends for medical applications. Carbohyd Polym 155:336–344Google Scholar
  8. de Oliveira SA, da Silva BC, Riegel-Vidotti IC, Urbano A, de Sousa Faria-Tischer PC, Tischer CA (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with hyaluronic acid from chicken comb. Int J Biol Macromol 97:642–653Google Scholar
  9. Desimone MF, Hélary C, Rietveld IB, Bataille I, Mosser G, Giraud-Guille MM, Coradin T (2010) Silica–collagen bionanocomposites as three-dimensional scaffolds for fibroblast immobilization. Acta Biomater 6(10):3998–4004Google Scholar
  10. El-Wakil NA, Hassan EA, Abou-Zeid RE, Dufresne A (2015) Development of wheat gluten/nanocellulose/titanium dioxide nanocomposites for active food packaging. Carbohyd Polym 124:337–346Google Scholar
  11. Essabir H, Raji M, Laaziz SA, Rodrique D, Bouhfid R, el kacem Qaiss A (2018) Thermo-mechanical performances of polypropylene biocomposites based on untreated, treated and compatibilized spent coffee grounds. Compos Part B Eng 149:1–11Google Scholar
  12. Fatehi H, Abtahi SM, Hashemolhosseini H, Hejazi SM (2018) A novel study on using protein based biopolymers in soil strengthening. Constr Build Mater 167:813–821Google Scholar
  13. Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Mano JF, Reis RL (2015) Cork–polymer biocomposites: mechanical, structural and thermal properties. Mater Des 82:282–289Google Scholar
  14. Garland NT, McLamore ES, Gomes C, Marrow EA, Daniele MA, Walper S, Claussen JC (2017) Synthesis and applications of cellulose nanohybrid materials. In: Hybrid polymer composite materials, vol 4. pp 289–320Google Scholar
  15. Ghanbari A, Tabarsa T, Ashori A, Shakeri A, Mashkour M (2018) Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic starch and cellulose nanofibers as green nanocomposites: extrusion processing. Int J Biol Macromol 112:442–447Google Scholar
  16. Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Ansari R, Mahmoodi MJ, Darvizeh A (2018) Effect of nanoparticle aggregation on the creep behavior of polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 162:93–100Google Scholar
  17. John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71(3):343–364Google Scholar
  18. Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Huang J, Lin N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Thomas S (2017) Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymer 132(2017):368–393Google Scholar
  19. La LB, Leatherday C, Leong YK, Watts HP, Zhang LC (2018) Green lightweight lead-free Gd2O3/epoxy nanocomposites with outstanding X-ray attenuation performance. Compos Sci Technol 163:89–95Google Scholar
  20. Lau KT, Hung PY, Zhu MH, Hui D (2018) Properties of natural fibre composites for structural engineering applications. Compos B Eng 136:222–233Google Scholar
  21. Lavoine N, Guillard V, Desloges I, Gontard N, Bras J (2016) Active bio-based food-packaging: diffusion and release of active substances through and from cellulose nanofiber coating toward food-packaging design. Carbohyd Polym 149:40–50Google Scholar
  22. Li WC, Tse HF, Fok L (2016) Plastic waste in the marine environment: a review of sources, occurrence and effects. Sci Total Environ 566:333–349Google Scholar
  23. Majid I, Nayik GA, Dar SM, Nanda V (2018) Novel food packaging technologies: innovations and future prospective. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 17(4):454–462Google Scholar
  24. Marra A, Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2016) Polylactic acid/zinc oxide biocomposite films for food packaging application. Int J Biol Macromol 88:254–262Google Scholar
  25. Meraldo A (2016) Introduction to bio-based polymers. In: Multilayer flexible packaging, 2nd edn. pp 47–52Google Scholar
  26. Miller DB, Glisson WB, Yampolskiy M, Choo KKR (2018) Identifying 3D printer residual data via open-source documentation. Comput Secur 75:10–23Google Scholar
  27. Morelli CL, Mahrous M, Belgacem MN, Branciforti MC, Bretas RES, Bras J (2015) Natural copaiba oil as antibacterial agent for bio-based active packaging. Ind Crops Prod 70:134–141Google Scholar
  28. Moreno M, Armentano I, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Torre L, Lligadas G, Cádiz V (2016) Cellulose nano-biocomposites from high oleic sunflower oil-derived thermosets. Eur Polymer J 79:109–120Google Scholar
  29. Nafchi AM, Alias AK, Mahmud S, Robal M (2012) Antimicrobial, rheological, and physicochemical properties of sago starch films filled with nanorod-rich zinc oxide. J Food Eng 113(4):511–519Google Scholar
  30. Okonkwo PC, Collins E, Okonkwo E (2017) Application of biopolymer composites in super capacitor. In: Biopolymer composites in electronics. pp 487–503Google Scholar
  31. Olivato JB, Marini J, Yamashita F, Pollet E, Grossmann MVE, Avérous L (2017) Sepiolite as a promising nanoclay for nano-biocomposites based on starch and biodegradable polyester. Mater Sci Eng C 70:296–302Google Scholar
  32. Park SB, Lih E, Park KS, Joung YK, Han DK (2017) Biopolymer-based functional composites for medical applications. Prog Polym Sci 68:77–105Google Scholar
  33. Petisco-Ferrero S, Álvarez LP, Ruiz-Rubio L, Vilela JV, Sarasua JR (2018) Plasma poly (acrylic acid) compatibilized hydroxyapatite-polylactide biocomposites for their use as body-absorbable osteosynthesis devices. Compos Sci Technol 161:66–73Google Scholar
  34. Rasoulzadeh M, Namazi H (2017) Carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene oxide bio-nanocomposite hydrogel beads as anticancer drug carrier agent. Carbohyd Polym 168:320–326Google Scholar
  35. Razza F, Degli Innocenti F, Dobon A, Aliaga C, Sanchez C, Hortal M (2015) Environmental profile of a bio-based and biodegradable foamed packaging prototype in comparison with the current benchmark. J Clean Prod 102:493–500Google Scholar
  36. Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS (2013) Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci 38(10–11):1629–1652Google Scholar
  37. Sadeghi-Varkani A, Emam-Djomeh Z, Askari G (2018) Morphology and physicochemical properties of a novel Lallemantia iberica mucilage/titanium dioxide bio-nanocomposite. Polym Testing 67:12–21Google Scholar
  38. Singh AA, Wei J, Herrera N, Geng S, Oksman K (2018) Synergistic effect of chitin nanocrystals and orientations induced by solid-state drawing on PLA-based nanocomposite tapes. Compos Sci Technol 162:140–145Google Scholar
  39. Tabatabaei RH, Jafari SM, Mirzaei H, Nafchi AM, Dehnad D (2018) Preparation and characterization of nano-SiO2 reinforced gelatin-k-carrageenan biocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 111:1091–1099Google Scholar
  40. Tesfaye M, Patwa R, Gupta A, Kashyap MJ, Katiyar V (2017) Recycling of poly (lactic acid)/silk based bionanocomposites films and its influence on thermal stability, crystallization kinetics, solution and melt rheology. Int J Biol Macromol 101:580–594Google Scholar
  41. Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014) Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohyd Polym 109:102–117Google Scholar
  42. Therias S, Murariu M, Dubois P (2017) Bionanocomposites based on PLA and halloysite nanotubes: from key properties to photooxidative degradation. Polym Degrad Stab 145:60–69Google Scholar
  43. Thomas MG, Abraham E, Jyotishkumar P, Maria HJ, Pothen LA, Thomas S (2015) Nanocelluloses from jute fibers and their nanocomposites with natural rubber: preparation and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol 81:768–777Google Scholar
  44. Wilton N, Lyon-Marion BA, Kamath R, McVey K, Pennell KD, Robbat A Jr (2018) Remediation of heavy hydrocarbon impacted soil using biopolymer and polystyrene foam beads. J Hazard Mater 349:153–159Google Scholar
  45. Xie DF, Martino VP, Sangwan P, Way C, Cash GA, Pollet E, Avérous L (2013) Elaboration and properties of plasticised chitosan-based exfoliated nano-biocomposites. Polymer 54(14):3654–3662Google Scholar
  46. Youssef AM, El-Sayed SM (2018) Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: concepts and future outlook. Carbohydr Polym 193:19–27Google Scholar
  47. Zhou Y, Lei L, Yang B, Li J, Ren J (2018) Preparation and characterization of polylactic acid (PLA) carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polym Testing 68:34–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naruemon Sumrith
    • 1
  • Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rapeephun Dangtungee
    • 1
  • Suchart Siengchin
    • 1
  • Mohammad Jawaid
    • 2
  • Catalin Iulian Pruncu
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, The Sirindhorn International Thai-German Graduate School of Engineering (TGGS)King Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP)Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)SerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations