Advertisement

Multi-objective Optimization of Confidence-Based Localization in Large-Scale Underwater Robotic Swarms

  • Adham SabraEmail author
  • Wai-keung Fung
  • Philip Churn
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 9)

Abstract

Localization in large-scale underwater swarm robotic systems has increasingly attracted research and industry communities’ attention. An optimized confidence-based localization algorithm is proposed for improving localization coverage and accuracy by promoting robots with high confidence of location estimates to references for their neighboring robots. Confidence update rules based on Bayes filters are proposed based on localization methods’ error characteristics where expected localization error is generated based on measurements such as operational depth and traveled distance. Parameters of the proposed algorithm are then optimized using the Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization algorithm NSGA-II for localization error and trilateration utilization minimization while maximizing localization confidence and Ultra-Short Base Line utilization. Simulation studies show that a wide localization coverage can be achieved using a single Ultra-Short Base Line system and localization mean error can be reduced by over 45% when algorithm’s parameters are optimized in an underwater swarm of 100 robots.

Keywords

Underwater swarm localization Confidence values Multi-objective optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    Han, G., Jiang, J., Shu, L., Xu, Y., Wang, F.: Localization algorithms of underwater wireless sensor networks: a survey. Sensors 12(12), 2026–2061 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng, X., Shu, H., Liang, Q., Du, D.H.C.: Silent positioning in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 57(3), 1756–1766 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tan, H.P., Eu, Z.A., Seah, W.K.G.: An enhanced underwater positioning system to support deepwater installations, OCEANS, Biloxi, MS, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sabra, A., Fung, W.: Dynamic localization plan for underwater mobile sensor nodes using fuzzy decision support system, OCEANS—Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, pp. 1–8 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou, Z., Cui, J., Zhou, S.: Efficient localization for large-scale underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 8(3), 267–279 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou, Z., Peng, Z., Cui, J., Shi, Z., Bagtzoglou, A.: Scalable localization with mobility prediction for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 10(3), 335–348 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhuvaneswari, P.T.V., Karthikeyan, S., Jeeva, B., Prasath, M.A.: An efficient mobility based localization in underwater sensor networks, Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Mathura, pp. 90–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, Z., Liu, Y.: Quality of trilateration: confidence-based iterative localization. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 21(5), 631–640 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sonardyne International limited, “Ranger USBL Acoustic Positioning System for DP and Survey” Ranger USBL datasheet, Sept. 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabra, A., Fung, W., Prabhu, R.: Confidence-based underwater localization scheme for large-scale mobile sensor networks, OCEANS—Charleston, Charleston, SC, Accepted (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thrun, S., Burgard, W., Fox, D.: Probabilistic Robotics, 3rd edn, pp. 13–38. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manolakis, D.E.: Efficient solution and performance analysis of 3-D position estimation by trilateration. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 32(4), 1239–1248 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedersen, M.E.: Good Parameters for Particle Swarm Optimization. Hvass Laboratories, Luxembourg (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Codling, E., Plank, M., Benhamou, S.: Random walk models in biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 5(25), 813–834 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deb, Kalyanmoy: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester, England (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Konak, A., Coit, D., Smith, A.: Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab. Eng. & Syst. Saf. 91(9), 992–1007 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kussat, N.H., Chadwell, C.D., Zimmerman, R.: Absolute positioning of an autonomous underwater vehicle using GPS and acoustic measurements. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 30(1), 153–164 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leonard, J., Bahr, A.: “Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation,” in Springer handbook of ocean engineering, M. Dhanak and N. Xiros, 1st edn, pp. 341–354. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paroscientific, Inc., “Submersible Depth Sensors Series 8000” datasheet, Dec. 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communications and Autonomous Systems Group, School of EngineeringRobert Gordon UniversityAberdeenUK
  2. 2.School of EngineeringRobert Gordon UniversityAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations