Advertisement

An Evaluation of Social Media Use in the Classroom at a Traditional University

  • Obrain Murire
  • Liezel CilliersEmail author
  • Kim Viljoen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 963)

Abstract

Emerging technologies, such as social media, have become essential tools to increase student-lecturer interaction, collaboration and communication in academia. Despite the popularity of social media, few lecturers use these tools for learning purposes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate social media usage in teaching and learning at a traditional university in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition (SAMR) model was used as the theoretical foundation for this study. The data was collected using a quantitative survey method. A questionnaire was distributed to the academics at the traditional university, with a response rate of 39% achieved. From these, descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. The study found that the use of social media at the traditional university can be placed at level two of the model (augmentation) while technology use in the class is further along at the modification level. Barriers that prevent lecturers from using social media for teaching purposes included lack of management support, inadequate resources, lack of training of traditional university lecturers and resistance to change. The study, therefore, recommends that management at traditional universities should reinforce the use of emerging technologies by lecturers to improve student-lecturer interaction, communication and promoting collaborative learning amongst students.

Keywords

Social media Teaching and learning Traditional universities 

References

  1. 1.
    Almeshal, T.: Social media adoption in learning and teaching by higher education faculty. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bexheti, L.A., Ismaili, B.E., Cico, B.H.: An analysis of social media usage in teaching and learning: the case of SEEU. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal Processing, Communications and Computers, pp. 90–94 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bingimlas, K.A.: Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: a review of the literature. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 5(3), 235–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birch, A., Irvine, V.: Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model. Educ. Media Int. 46(4), 295–315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulbulia, Z., Wassermann, J.: Rethinking the usefulness of Twitter in higher education. Educ. Sci. 11(1), 31–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, B., Bryer, T.: Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 13(1), 87–104 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chetty, P.: The top 5 intellectual property risks on social media. Technical report. http://smetoolkit.businesspartners.co.za/en/content/top-5-intellectual-property-risks-social-media
  8. 8.
    Cilliers, L.: Wiki acceptance by university students to improve collaboration in higher education. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 54(5), 485–493 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Higher Education South Africa: Strategic framework for HESA 2015–2019. Technical report (2014). http://www.hesa.org.za/
  10. 10.
    Cilliers, L., Viljoen, K.L.A., Chinyamurindi, W.T.: A study on students’ acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information in South Africa. Health Inf. Manag. J. 47(2), 59–69 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Council on Higher Education: A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: the case for a flexible curriculum structure. Report of the Task Team on Undergraduate Curriculum Structure, Discussion Document (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kagohara, D.M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., Davis, T.N.: Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34(1), 147–156 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horiz. 53(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kopcha, T.J.: Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Comput. Educ. 33, 1100–1121 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lubega, J.T., Mugisha, A.K., Muyinda, P.B.: Adoption of the SAMR model to asses ICT pedagogical adoption: a case of Makerere University. Int. J. e-Educ., e-Bus., e-Manag. e-Learn. 4(2), 106–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madhav, N., Joseph, M.K., Twala, B.: Creating social learning spaces to enhance the learning experience. Technical report, University of Johannesburg (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mbodila, M., Ndebele, C., Muhandji, K.: The effect of social media on students’ engagement and collaboration in higher education: a case study of the use of Facebook at a South African University. J. Commun. 5(2), 115–125 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohamedbhai, G.: The Effects of massification of Higher Education in Africa. Report from the Working Group on Higher Education of the Association for the Development of Education in Africa (2008, 2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Motamedi, V.: Integration of technology in our classrooms: a divisive issue. Technical report, Teheran (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murire, O., Cilliers, L.: Social media adoption among lecturers at a traditional university in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Manag. 19(1), 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nurulrabihah, M.N., Siti-Hajar, A.R., Norlidah, A., Saedah, S., Mohd-Ridhuan, M.J., Zaharah, H.: Usage of Facebook: the future impact of curriculum implementation on students in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of 13th International Educational Technology Conference, pp. 1261–1270 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oxnevad, S.: Using the SAMR model to teach above the line. Technical report, 13 July 2013. http://gettingsmart.com/2013/07/
  23. 23.
    Oye, N.D., Iahad, N.A., Rahim, N.A.: The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19, 251–270 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Puentedura, R.: Transformation, technology, and education. Technical report (2006). http://www.hippasus.com/resources/tte/
  25. 25.
    Robinson, G.: Why tablets are a key learning tool in special education. TabTimes Technical report (2014). http://tabtimes.com/
  26. 26.
    Schlenkrich, L., Sewry, D.A.: Factors for successful use of social networking sites in higher education. S. Afr. Comput. J. 49, 12–24 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tarantino, K., McDonough, J., Hua, M.: Effects of student engagement with social media on student learning: a review of literature. J. Technol. Stud. Aff. 1(8), 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zulu, C.: Empowering first year (post-matric) students in basic research skills: a strategy for education for social justice. S. Afr. J. Educ. 31(3), 447–457 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Fort HareEast LondonSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Business ManagementUniversity of Fort HareEast LondonSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations