Advertisement

Off-Task Media Use in Lectures: Towards a Theory of Determinants

  • Douglas A. ParryEmail author
  • Daniel B. le Roux
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 963)

Abstract

A growing body of evidence indicates that university students frequently engage in off-task media use (OTMU) during lectures. While the bulk of research in this area has considered the frequency and impact of such behaviour, little work concerning the subjective and contextual factors that determine OTMU in academic settings has been conducted. In this study we adopt a qualitative approach to consider the determinants of this behaviour. Seven key factors that determine students’ OTMU in lectures are identified: OTMU policy, OTMU norms, Fear of missing out, Grit, Control over technology, Quality of lecture, and Visibility of peers’ OTMU. We propose a model which specifies the relationships between these factors and discuss how institutions and lecturers can navigate the challenges posed by OTMU in lectures.

Keywords

Off-task media use Cyber-slacking Media multitasking 

References

  1. 1.
    Aagaard, J.: Drawn to distraction: a qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Comput. Educ. 87, 90–97 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control. SSSSP, pp. 11–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annan-Coultas, B.D.L.: Laptops as instructional tools: student perceptions. TechTrends 56(5), 34–42 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babbie, E.: The Practice of Social Research, 13th edn. Cengage, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beland, L.P., Murphy, R.: Ill communication: technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Econ. 41, 61–76 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berger, P.: Beyond plain acceptance or sheer resistance: a typology of university instructors’ attitudes to students’ media use in class. Teach. Teach. Educ. 67, 410–417 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackburn, K., Lefebvre, L., Richardson, E.: Technological task interruptions in the classroom. Fla. Commun. J. Technol. Interruptions XLI (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis revised. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheever, N.A., Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Chavez, A.: Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 290–297 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., Kelly, D.R.: Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92(6), 1087–1101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., Rennie, D.L.: Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 38, 215–229 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Taylor & Francis, Milton Park (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flanigan, A.E., Babchuk, W.A.: Social media as academic quicksand: a phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learn. Individ. Differ. 44, 40–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flanigan, A.E., Kiewra, K.A.: What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30(2), 585–597 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fried, C.B.: In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput. Educ. 50(3), 906–914 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo, Z., Tan, F.B., Cheung, K.: Students’ uses and gratifications for using computer-mediated communication media in learning contexts. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 339–378 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobsen, W.C., Forste, R.: The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14(5), 275–280 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Junco, R.: In-class multitasking and academic performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(6), 2236–2243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Junco, R., Cotten, S.: A decade of distraction? How multitasking affects student outcomes. In: Proceedings of Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, pp. 1–38. Oxford Internet Institute (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kitzinger, J.: Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. B. M. J. 311(7000), 299–302 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leysens, J.L., le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: Can I have your attention, please? An empirical investigation of media multitasking during university lectures. In: SAICSIT 2016 Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Paper #21 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching. SAGE, Newcastle upon Tyne (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morgan, D.: Focus groups as qualitative research. Qual. Res. Methods Ser. 16(2), 6–17 (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    North, D., Johnston, K., Ophoff, J.: The use of mobile phones by South African university students. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 11, 115–138 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parry, D.A.: The digitally-mediated study experiences of undergraduate students in South Africa. M.-Thesis, Stellenbosch University (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parry, D.A., le Roux, D.B.: In-lecture media use and academic performance: investigating demographic and intentional moderators. S. Afr. Comput. J. 30(1), 85–107 (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C.R., Gladwell, V.: Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1841–1848 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A.: The transsituational influence of social norms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64(1), 104–112 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McMaughton-Nichols, C., Ormston, R.: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE, Newcastle upon Tyne (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roberts, N., Rees, M.: Student use of mobile devices in university lectures. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 30(4), 415–426 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosen, L.D., Carrier, M., Cheever, N.A.: Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 948–958 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosen, L.D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Is Facebook creating ‘iDisorders’? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 1243–1254 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: A new generation of students: digital media in academic contexts. CCIS 730, 19–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: In-lecture media use and academic performance: does subject area matter? Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 86–94 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sana, F., Weston, T., Cepeda, N.J.: Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Comput. Educ. 62, 24–31 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sapacz, M., Rockman, G., Clark, J.: Are we addicted to our cell phones? Comput. Hum. Behav. 57, 153–159 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van der Schuur, W., Baumgartner, S.E., Sumter, S.R., Valkenburg, P.M.: The consequences of media multitasking for youth: a review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 53, 204–215 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Strauss, V.: Why a leading professor of new media just banned technology use in class. Technical report (2014). https://goo.gl/hzejkd
  40. 40.
    Taneja, A., Fiore, V., Fischer, B.: Cyber-slacking in the classroom: potential for digital distraction in the new age. Comput. Educ. 82, 141–151 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Twining, P., Heller, R., Nussbaum, M., Tsai, C.: Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Comput. Educ. 106, 1–9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Williams, J.A., Cox, D.: I got distracted by their being distracted. East. Educ. J. 40(1), 48–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang, W., Zhang, L.: Explicating multitasking with computers: gratifications and situations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1883–1891 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations