Evolution of Heterogeneous Microstructure of Equal-Channel Angular Pressed Magnesium

  • Qizhen LiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


This study investigated the distribution variations of the 0002 poles of magnesium after experienced a series of numbers of equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) passes through either the Bc route or the C route. For the ECAP processing, the mold channel angle was 142° and the sample temperature was 200 °C. The results show that most 0002 poles are in the ring of about 60–80° away from the ED for all ECAPed samples, and the location of the maximum intensity oscillates in the 60–80° range. The first ECAP pass increased the nonuniformity of the distribution of 0002 poles, while the following ECAP passes resulted in more uniform distribution of 0002 poles in the 60–80° ring and reduced texture intensity through decreasing the maximum intensity and the intensity range of 0002 poles with the increase in the number of ECAP passes for both Bc and C routes.


Equal-channel angular pressing Magnesium Texture 



The author appreciates the financial support for this work from the Basic Energy Sciences Office at the US Department of Energy under Award no. DESC0016333.


  1. 1.
    M.M. Avedesian, H. Baker, ASM specialty handbook: magnesium and magnesium alloys, ASM international Materials Park, OH1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Q. Li, B. Tian, Mechanical properties and microstructure of pure polycrystalline magnesium rolled by different routes, Materials Letters 67(1) (2012) 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Q. Li, Dynamic mechanical response of magnesium single crystal under compression loading: Experiments, model, and simulations, Journal of Applied Physics 109(10) (2011) 103514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Q. Li, Mechanical properties and microscopic deformation mechanism of polycrystalline magnesium under high-strain-rate compressive loadings, Materials Science and Engineering: A 540 (2012) 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Habibnejad-Korayem, R. Mahmudi, W. Poole, Enhanced properties of Mg-based nano-composites reinforced with Al 2 O 3 nano-particles, Materials Science and Engineering: A 519(1) (2009) 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Cay, H. Xu, Q. Li, Mechanical behavior of porous magnesium/alumina composites with high strength and low density, Materials Science and Engineering: A 574 (2013) 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Q. Li, Carbon nanotube reinforced porous magnesium composite: 3D nondestructive microstructure characterization using x-ray micro-computed tomography, Materials Letters 133 (2014) 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Hassan, M. Gupta, Effect of different types of nano-size oxide particulates on microstructural and mechanical properties of elemental Mg, Journal of Materials Science 41(8) (2006) 2229–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q. Li, Effect of porosity and carbon composition on pore microstructure of magnesium/carbon nanotube composite foams, Materials & Design 89 (2016) 978–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.K. Thakur, G.T. Kwee, M. Gupta, Development and characterization of magnesium composites containing nano-sized silicon carbide and carbon nanotubes as hybrid reinforcements, Journal of Materials Science 42(24) (2007) 10040–10046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Zou, Q. Li, Compressive mechanical property of porous magnesium composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes, Journal of Materials Science 51(11) (2016) 5232–5239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Xu, N. Zou, Q. Li, Effect of Ball Milling Time on Microstructure and Hardness of Porous Magnesium/Carbon Nanofiber Composites, JOM (2017) 1–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Fukuda, K. Kondoh, J. Umeda, B. Fugetsu, Fabrication of magnesium based composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes having superior mechanical properties, Materials Chemistry and Physics 127(3) (2011) 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Xu, Q. Li, Effect of carbon nanofiber concentration on mechanical properties of porous magnesium composites: Experimental and theoretical analysis, Materials Science and Engineering: A 706 (2017) 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Q. Li, B. Tian, Compression behavior of magnesium/carbon nanotube composites, Journal of Materials Research 28(14) (2013) 1877–1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Kondoh, H. Fukuda, J. Umeda, H. Imai, B. Fugetsu, M. Endo, Microstructural and mechanical analysis of carbon nanotube reinforced magnesium alloy powder composites, Materials Science and Engineering: A 527(16) (2010) 4103–4108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Tian, Z.G. Cheng, Y.X. Tong, L. Li, Y.F. Zheng, Q. Li, Effect of enhanced interfacial reaction on the microstructure, phase transformation and mechanical property of Ni–Mn–Ga particles/Mg composites, Materials & Design 82 (2015) 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Tian, F. Chen, Y.X. Tong, L. Li, Y.F. Zheng, Y. Liu, Q. Li, Phase transition of Ni–Mn–Ga alloy powders prepared by vibration ball milling, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509(13) (2011) 4563–4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.S. Vinod Kumar, M. Mukherjee, F. Garcia-Moreno, J. Banhart, Reduced-Pressure Foaming of Aluminum Alloys, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 44(1) (2013) 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Fan, X. Chen, X. Liu, H. Zhang, Y. Li, Bubble Formation at a Submerged Orifice for Aluminum Foams Produced by Gas Injection Method, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 44(2) (2013) 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    X. Jiao, Q. Li, An observation about global microstructure of ECAPed magnesium, Emerging Materials Research 3(6) (2014) 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Cao, Y. Yu, M. Li, H. Luo, Cell Structure Evolution of Aluminum Foams Under Reduced Pressure Foaming, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 47(9) (2016) 4378–4381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Q. Li, X. Jiao, Exploration of equal channel angular pressing routes for efficiently achieving ultrafine microstructure in magnesium, Materials Science and Engineering: A 733 (2018) 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Furukawa, Y. Iwahashi, Z. Horita, M. Nemoto, T.G. Langdon, The shearing characteristics associated with equal-channel angular pressing, Materials Science and Engineering: A 257(2) (1998) 328–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F.S.J. Poggiali, C.L.P. Silva, P.H.R. Pereira, R.B. Figueiredo, P.R. Cetlin, Determination of mechanical anisotropy of magnesium processed by ECAP, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 3(4) (2014) 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Gubicza, K. Máthis, Z. Hegedűs, G. Ribárik, A.L. Tóth, Inhomogeneous evolution of microstructure in AZ91 Mg-alloy during high temperature equal-channel angular pressing, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 492(1) (2010) 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Yan, Y.-S. Sun, J. Bai, F. Xue, Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZA62 Mg alloy by equal-channel angular pressing, Materials Science and Engineering: A 528(3) (2011) 1149–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. He, Q. Pan, Y. Qin, X. Liu, W. Li, Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrafine grain ZK60 alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing, Journal of materials science 45(6) (2010) 1655–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations