Advertisement

An Improved Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain

  • Hong Guo
  • Hongqiang Zheng
  • Kai Xu
  • Xiangrui Kong
  • Jing Liu
  • Fang Liu
  • Keke Gai
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11373)

Abstract

When consistency and stability is becoming more and more important in network, blockchain is emerging as a potential solution for this challenge. The network is always the focus of the blockchain for it is the foundation of all the services. It is still a challenge on how to improve the performance of the network especially in the implementation of a real blockchain. In this paper, an improved network for blockchain is proposed to combine different blockchain networks together. It uses POU consensus mechanism to make the blockchain network environment better, which consists of Proof of Stake Entrance, Hash Net Verification and Delegated Parliament. This improved consensus mechanism is used in Unitary blockchain network. It can provide stable and credible network services for business and related requirements.

Keywords

Consensus mechanism POU Blockchain 

References

  1. 1.
    Juan, F., Galvez, J., Me, J.: Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33(3), 527–537 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zheng, B., Zhu, L., Shen, M.: Scalable and privacy-preserving data sharing based on blockchain. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33(3), 557–567 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yuan, R., Xia, Y., Chen, H.: Private smart contract on public blockchain. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33(3), 542–556 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorr, A., Steger, M., Kanhe, S., Jurdak, R.: A distributed solution to automotive security and privacy. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55(12), 119–125 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gai, K., Qiu, M., Xiong, Z., Liu, M.: Privacy-preserving multi-channel communication in edge-of-things. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 85, 190–200 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gai, K., Choo, K.R., Qiu, M., Zhu, L.: Privacy-preserving content-oriented wireless communication in internet-of-things. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(4), 3059–3067 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gai, K., Qiu, M., Ming, Z., Zhao, H., Qiu, L.: Spoofing-jamming attack strategy using optimal power distributions in wireless smart grid networks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(5), 2431–2439 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gai, K., Qiu, M., Zhao, H.: Energy-aware task assignment for mobile cyber-enabled applications in heterogeneous cloud computing. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 111, 126–135 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gai, K., Qiu, M.: Blend arithmetic operations on tensor-based fully homomorphic encryption over real numbers. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14(8), 3590–3598 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mylrea, M., Gourisetti, S.: Blockchain for smart grid resilience: Exchanging distributed energy at speed, scale and security. In: 2017 Resilience Week (RWS), pp. 18–23, Wilmington, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., Beloff, N.: Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. In: The 7th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN 2016)/The 6th International Conference on Current and Future Trends of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare (ICTH-2016)/Affiliated Workshops, 19-22 Sept 2016, London, UK, pp. 461–466 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosba, A.E., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., Papamanthou, C.: Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2016, CA, USA, 22–26 May 2016, pp. 839–858 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valenta, L., Rowan, B.: Blindcoin: blinded, accountable mixes for bitcoin. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 112–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Münsing, E., Mather, J., Moura, S.: Blockchains for decentralized optimization of energy resources in microgrid networks. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pp. 2164–2171 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eyal, I., Gencer, A.E., Sirer, E.G., Renesse, R.: Bitcoin-NG: a scalable blockchain protocol. In: 13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI 2016, Santa Clara, CA, USA, March 16–18, 2016, pp. 45–59 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu, L., Yulu, W., Gai, K., Choo, K.-K.R.: Controllable and trustworthy blockchain-based cloud data management. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 91, 527–535 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hong Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongqiang Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kai Xu
    • 3
  • Xiangrui Kong
    • 4
  • Jing Liu
    • 1
  • Fang Liu
    • 5
  • Keke Gai
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Computer ScienceWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Real-time Industrial SystemWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Computer Science and TechnologyBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  4. 4.UINP LabHangzhouChina
  5. 5.City College of Wuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations