Advertisement

One Secure IoT Scheme for Protection of True Nodes

  • Yongkai Fan
  • Guanqun Zhao
  • Xiaodong Lin
  • Xiaofeng Sun
  • Dandan Zhu
  • Jing Lei
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11344)

Abstract

As a new generation of information technologies, IoT has been applied into many industrial fields and made great contributions to our everyday life. However, vulnerability of IoT constrains the application of IoT, especially, when the node used in IoT systems is malicious one which may break the system and leakage vital data (for example, nodes used by patient to transfer condition data). To tackle the security concerning, we propose one secure IoT framework used to protect true nodes and ensure the secure operation. Firstly, we introduce two types of IoT classic architectures and summarize the security challenges, then we give an introduction and comparison of several IoT security frameworks. At last, we propose our scheme for protecting the safety of IoT nodes in the perception layer.

Keywords

IoT Security Security framework IoT node 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giusto, D., Iera, A., Morabito, G., Atzori, L.: The Internet of Things. Springer, New York (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1674-7. ISBN 978-1-4419-1673-0CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Internet of Things, ITU Internet Reports (2005). http://www.itu.int/internetofthings/
  4. 4.
    INFSO D.4 Networked Enterprise & RFID INFSO G.2 Micro & Nano systems. In: Co-operation with the Working Group RFID of the ETP EPOSS, Internet of Things in 2020, Roadmap for the Future, Version 1.1, 27 May 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vermesan, O., et al.: Internet of things strategic research and innovation agenda. River Publishers Series in Communications, p. 7 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maheswari, S.U., et al.: A novel robust routing protocol RAEED to avoid DoS attacks in WSN. In: 2016 International Conference on Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES). IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ilic, A., Staake, T., Fleisch, E.: Using sensor information to reduce the carbon footprint of perishable goods. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8(1), 22–29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siano, P.: Demand response and smart grids—A survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 461–478 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hao, L., et al.: The application and implementation research of smart city in China. In: 2012 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan, Y., Liu, S., Tan, G., et al.: Fine-grained access control based on trusted execution environment. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahmoud, R., et al.: Internet of things (IoT) security: current status, challenges and prospective measures. In: 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST). IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu, L.D., He, W., Li, S.: Internet of things in industries: a survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10(4), 2233–2243 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anggorojati, B., et al.: Capability-based access control delegation model on the federated IoT network. In: 2012 15th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, H.C.: Collaboration IoT-based RBAC with trust evaluation algorithm model for massive IoT integrated application. Mobile Netw. Appl., 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanchez, P.M., Lopez, R.M., Skarmeta, A.F.G.: PANATIKI: a network access control implementation based on PANA for IoT devices. Sensors 13(11), 14888–14917 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereira, P.P., Eliasson, J., Delsing, J.: An authentication and access control framework for CoAP-based internet of things. In: IECON 2014-40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 5293–5299. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernabe, J.B., Ramos, J.L.H., Gomez, A.F.S.: TACIoT: multidimensional trust-aware access control system for the internet of things. Soft. Comput. 20(5), 1763–1779 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guoping, Z., Wentao, G.: The research of access control based on UCON in the internet of things. J. Softw. 6(4), 724–731 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monir, S.: A Lightweight Attribute-Based Access Control System for IoT (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, X., Craig, P., Lin, H., et al.: SecIoT: a security framework for the internet of things. Secur. Commun. Netw. 9(16), 3083–3094 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahman, A.F.A., Daud, M., Mohamad, M.Z.: Securing sensor to cloud ecosystem using internet of things (IoT) security framework. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing, p. 79. ACM (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongkai Fan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guanqun Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaodong Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaofeng Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dandan Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jing Lei
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Beijing Key Lab of Petroleum Data MiningChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options