Advertisement

Wear Mechanism for H13 Steel Tool During Friction Stir Welding of CuCrZr Alloy

  • Pankaj Sahlot
  • R. S. Mishra
  • Amit AroraEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Wear affects shape and size of the friction stir welding (FSW) tool, and leads to unexpected weld properties and shorter tool life. Understanding wear mechanisms during FSW is important to prevent or reduce tool wear and ensure longer tool life for joining of high melting point metallic (HMPM) materials. Severe tool wear is a consequence of extreme thermo-mechanical environment around the tool during welding. The macroscopic and microscopic investigations of wear mechanism are conducted by performing 3D profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Analysis of the scratch formation on the tool surface is used to ascertain the presence of abrasive wear mechanism. Adhesive wear is confirmed by investigating the tool–workpiece interface layer, which features diffusion of copper. This understanding of tool wear mechanism during FSW of high melting point metallic materials will enable selection of better tool materials and improved weld properties.

Keywords

Friction stir welding Tool wear Wear mechanism Adhesive wear Abrasive wear 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Board for Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), (36(2)/20/02/2014-BRNS/). Authors are also grateful to Dr. G. K. Dey, Materials Group and Mr. Kaushal Jha, Engineering Design & Development Division for their support to use the research facilities available at BARC. Authors would also like to thanks Dr. Ramesh Singh for permission use the research facility at IIT Bombay.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Templesmith P, Dawes CJ (1991) Great Britain patent application no. 9125978.8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson B, Babu SS (2010) Tool degradation characterization in the friction stir welding of hard metals. Weld J 89(December):256–261Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park SHC, Sato YS, Kokawa H, Okamoto K, Hirano S, Inagaki M (2009) Boride formation induced by pcBN tool wear in friction-stir-welded stainless steels. Metall Mater Trans A 40(3):625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rai R, De A, Bhadeshia HKDH, DebRoy T (2011) Review: friction stir welding tools. Sci Technol Weld Join 16(4):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prado RA, Murr LE, Shindo DJ, Soto KF (2001) Tool wear in the friction-stir welding of aluminum alloy 6061 + 20% Al2O3: a preliminary study. Scr Mater 45(1):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi D, Lee C, Ahn B, Choi J (2009) Frictional wear evaluation of WC–Co alloy tool in friction stir spot welding of low carbon steel plates. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27(6):931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu HJ, Feng JC, Fujii H, Nogi K (2005) Wear characteristics of a WC–Co tool in friction stir welding of AC4A + 30 vol%SiCp composite. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(14):1635–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prado R, Murr L, Soto K, McClure J (2003) Self-optimization in tool wear for friction-stir welding of Al 6061 + 20% Al 2 O 3 MMC. Mater Sci Eng A 349:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gan W, Li ZT, Khurana S (2007) Tool materials selection for friction stir welding of L80 steel. Sci Technol Weld Join 12(7):610–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato YS, Miyake M, Susukida S, Kokawa H, Omori T, Ishida K (2015) Performance enhancement of co-based alloy tool for friction stir welding of ferritic steel. In: Friction stir welding symposium and processing VIII, pp 39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tarasov SY, Rubtsov VE, Kolubaev EA (2014) A proposed diffusion-controlled wear mechanism of alloy steel friction stir welding (FSW) tools used on an aluminum alloy. Wear 318:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Su J, Mishra RS, Xu R, Baumann JA (2014) Tool wear mechanisms in friction stir welding of Ti – 6Al – 4 V alloy. Wear 321:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farias A, Batalha GF, Prados EF, Magnabosco R, Delijaicov S (2013) Tool wear evaluations in friction stir processing of commercial titanium Ti–6Al–4V. Wear 302(1–2):1327–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sahlot P, Jha K, Dey GK, Arora A (2017) Quantitative wear analysis of H13 steel tool during friction stir welding of Cu-0.8%Cr-0.1%Zr alloy. Wear 378–379:82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sahlot P, Arora A (2018) Numerical model for prediction of tool wear and worn-out pin profile during friction stir welding. Wear 408–409:96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sahlot P, Jha K, Dey GK, Arora A, Wear-induced changes in FSW tool pin profile: Effect of process parameters. Metall Mater Trans A 1–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rothman SJ, Peterson NL, Walter CM, Nowicki LJ (1968) Diffusivity of copper in Iron. J Appl Phys 39(11):5041–5044CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Materials Processing Research GroupMaterials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology GandhinagarPalaj, GandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of TechnologyPandit Deendayal Petroleum UniversityGandhinagarIndia
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringCenter for Friction Stir Processing, University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations