Advertisement

Intermittent Flow of Material and Force-Based Defect Detection During Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum Alloys

  • Daniel J. Franke
  • Michael R. Zinn
  • Frank E. PfefferkornEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The cost limitations of post-weld inspection have driven the need for in situ process monitoring of subsurface defects. Subsurface defects are believed to be formed due to a breakdown in the intermittent flow of material around the friction stir tool once per revolution. This work examines the intermittent flow of material and its relation to defect formation. In addition, advances have been made in a force-based defect detection model that links changes in process forces to the formation and size of defects. A range of aluminum alloys has been examined, showing that softer aluminum alloys produce less distinct changes in process forces during defect formation and harder aluminum alloys produce more distinct changes when using the same tool geometry.

Keywords

Aluminum alloys Nondestructive evaluation Intermittent material flow Forces 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of this work by the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Machine Tool Technology Research Foundation, and the U.S. National Science Foundation through grants CMMI-1332738 and CMMI-1826104.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Temple-Smith P, Dawes CJ (1991) Friction stir butt welding. GB Patent No. 9125978.8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mishra RS, Ma ZY (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 50:1–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Threadgill PL et al (2009) Friction stir welding of aluminium alloys. Int Mat Rev 54:49–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shrivastava A, Overcash M, Pfefferkorn FE (2015) Prediction of unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) energy consumption in a friction stir weld. SME J Manuf Proc 18:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shrivastava A, Krones M, Pfefferkorn FE (2015) Comparison of energy consumption and environmental impact of friction stir welding and gas metal arc welding for aluminum. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 9:159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krishnan KN (2002) On the formation of onion rings in friction stir welds. Mater Sci Eng A 327:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colligan K (1999) Material flow behavior during friction stir welding of aluminum. Weld Res Suppl 229–237Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kh A, Hassan A, Prangnell PB, Norman AF, Price DA, Williams SW (2003) Effect of welding parameters on nugget zone microstructure and properties in high strength aluminium alloy friction stir welds. Sci Technol Weld Joining 8:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prangnell PB, Heason CP (2005) Grain structure formation during friction stir welding observed by the ‘stop action technique. Acta Mater 53:3179–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider JA, Nunes AC (2004) Characterization of plastic flow and resulting microtextures in a FSW. Metall Mater Trans B 35(4):777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arbegast WJ (2003) Modeling friction stir joining as a metalworking process. In: Jin Z (ed) Hot deformation of aluminum alloys III, TMS (The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonda R, Reynolds A, Feng CR, Knipling K, Rowenhorst D (2013) Material flow in friction stir welds. Metall Mater Trans A 44:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abergast WJ (2008) A flow-partitioned deformation zone model for defect formation during friction stir welding. Scr Mater 58:372–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt H, Dickerson TL, Hattel JH (2006) Material flow in butt friction stir welds in AA2024-T3. Acta Mater 54:1199–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tongne A, Jahazi M, Feulvarch E, Desrayaud C (2015) Banded structures in friction stir welded Al alloys. J Mater Process Technol 221:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boldsaikhan E, Burford DA, Gimenez Britos PJ (2011) Effect of plasticized material flow on the tool feedback forces during friction stir welding. Frict Stir Weld Proc VI:335–343Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boldsaikhan E, Corwin EM, Logar AM, Arbegast WJ (2011) The use of neural network and discrete Fourier transform for real-time evaluation of friction stir welding. Appl Soft Comput 11:4839–4846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boldsaikhan E, McCoy M (2013) Analysis of tool feedback forces and material flow during friction stir welding. Frict Stir Weld Proc VII:311–320Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shrivastava A, Zinn M, Duffie NA, Ferrier NJ, Smith CB, Pfefferkorn FE (2017) Force measurement-based discontinuity detection during friction stir welding. J Manuf Proc 26:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shultz EF, Cole EG, Smith CB, Zinn MR, Ferrier NJ, Pfefferkorn FE (2010) Effect of compliance and travel angle on friction stir welding with gaps. J Manuf Sci Eng 132:0410101–0410109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MatWeb (2018) Material property data. www.matweb.com: Aluminum 3003-O, Aluminum 6061-T6; 6061-T651, Aluminum 7075-T6; 7075-T651, Aluminum 2024-T3

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Franke
    • 1
  • Michael R. Zinn
    • 1
  • Frank E. Pfefferkorn
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations