Advertisement

Advances in Signal Processing for Friction Stir Welding Temperature Control

  • Brandon Scott TaysomEmail author
  • Carl David Sorensen
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Precise temperature control of FSW benefits from control and manipulated signals that are responsive and smooth. Accurate measurement of tool temperature and spindle speed feedback are important to temperature control, but often noise in these signals prevents optimal control. Two different methods are developed in this paper to improve signal quality. A series of Bezier curves are used to compensate signals which exhibit a periodic but arbitrarily-shaped offset. Least-squares fitting is used to obtain quality derivatives from discrete or noisy signals. The Bezier method is used to decrease the inaccurate temperature fluctuation measurements reported by telemetry collar error and adds no time delay or phase shift. The least-squares approach is used to estimate spindle speed and temperature derivatives and adds only minimal time delay while substantially reducing noise.

Keywords

Friction stir welding Temperature control Signal processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Lakshminarayanan AK, Balasubramanian V, Elangovan K (2009) Effect of welding processes on tensile properties of AA6061 aluminium alloy joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahoney MW, Rhodes CG, Flintoff JG, Bingel WH, Spurling RA (1998) Properties of friction-stir-welded 7075 T651 aluminum. Metall Mater Trans A 29:1955–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fehrenbacher A, Duffie NA, Ferrier NJ, Pfefferkorn FE, Zinn MR (2014) Effects of tool-workpiece interface temperature on weld quality and quality improvements through temperature control in friction stir welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:165–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5364-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robson JD, Cui S, Chen ZW (2010) Incipient melting during friction stir processing of AZ91 magnesium castings. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7299–7304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cederqvist L, Garpinger O, Hagglund T, Robertsson A (2011) Reliable sealing of copper canisters through cascaded control of power input and tool temperature. In: Mishra R, Mahoney MW, Sato Y, Hovanski Y, Verma R (eds) Friction stir welding and processing VI. Wiley, Inc., Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chimbli SK, Medlin DJ, Arbegast WJ (2007) Minimizing lack of consolidation defects in friction stir welds. In: Proceedings of 136th TMS annual meeting friction stir welding and processing IV symposia, TMS, pp. 135–142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taysom BS (2015) Temperature control in friction stir welding using model predictive control. Brigham Young University.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004
  8. 8.
    Taysom BS, Sorensen CD, Hedengren JD (2017) A comparison of model predictive control and PID temperature control in friction stir welding. J Manuf Process 29:232–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross KA, Sorensen CD (2013) Effort modulation for process control of friction stir operations. US 20140207274 A1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ross KA (2012) Investigation and implementation of a robust temperature control algorithm for friction stir welding. Brigham Young UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cederqvist L, Garpinger O, Hägglund T, Robertsson A (2012) Cascade control of the friction stir welding process to seal canisters for spent nuclear fuel. Control Eng Pract 20:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fehrenbacher A, Smith CB, Duffie NA, Ferrier NJ, Pfefferkorn FE, Zinn MR (2014) Combined temperature and force control for robotic friction stir welding. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:21007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cederqvist L, Garpinger O, Cervin A, Nielsen I (2015) Improved temperature and depth control during FSW of copper canisters using feedforward compensation. In: Friction stir welding and processing VIII, pp. 69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48173-9_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ross K (2014) Temperature control in friction stir welding for industrial and research applications. In: 10th international symposium on friction stir weldingGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Backer J, Bolmsjo G, Christiansson A-K (2014) Temperature control of robotic friction stir welding using the thermoelectric effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:375–383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5279-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall D, Sorensen CD (2013) System parameter identification for friction stir processing. TMS Annu Meet 289–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48108-1_30Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taysom BS, Sorensen CD, Hedengren JD (2016) Dynamic modeling of friction stir welding for model predictive control. J Manuf Process 23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall D (2013) An alternative system identification method for friction stir processing. Brigham Young UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations