Advertisement

Flow Control in the Model of a Continuous Caster by Using Contactless Inductive Flow Tomography

  • I. GlavinićEmail author
  • S. Abouelazayem
  • M. Ratajczak
  • D. Schurmann
  • S. Eckert
  • F. Stefani
  • J. Hlava
  • T. Wondrak
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The global flow pattern of liquid metal in the slab mold of a continuous caster is difficult to control, as it cannot be measured in real-time by conventional methods. Contactless inductive flow tomography (CIFT) can easily provide real-time information about the flow structure (double or single roll) and the angle of the jet coming out of the submerged entry nozzle (SEN) just from the raw sensor data. Furthermore, by solving the underlying linear inverse problem, the full velocity field can be reconstructed. This paper discusses the possibility of applying CIFT for flow pattern recognition in continuous casting, which is then used for setting an electromagnetic brake in order to control the angle of the fluid jet. The control loop will be implemented and developed for the Mini-LIMMCAST model of a continuous caster at Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR).

Keywords

Continuous casting Flow control Inductive measurement techniques Electromagnetic brake 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 764902 (TOMOCON—www.tomocon.eu).

References

  1. 1.
    Laing J (1843) US Patent 3023Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Steel Association (2017) Steel statistical yearbook 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dauby PH (2012) Continuous casting: make better steel and more of it! Rev Métall 109:113–136.  https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2012011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wondrak T, Pal J, Stefani F et al (2018) Visualization of global flow structure in a modified Rayleigh-Bénard setup using contactless inductive flow tomography. Flow Meas Instrum 62:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratajczak M, Gundrum T, Stefani F, Wondrak T (2014) Contactless inductive flow tomography: brief history and recent developments in its application to continuous casting. J Sens 2014:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/739161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stefani F, Gerbeth G (2000) On the uniqueness of velocity reconstruction in conducting fluids from measurements of induced electromagnetic fields. Inverse Prob 16:1.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/16/1/301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stefani F, Gundrum T, Gerbeth G (2004) Contactless inductive flow tomography. Phys Rev E 70.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056306
  8. 8.
    Wondrak T, Stefani F, Gundrum T, Gerbeth G (2009) Some methodological improvements of the contactless inductive flow tomography. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 30:255–264.  https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-2009-1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wondrak T, Galindo V, Gerbeth G et al (2010) Contactless inductive flow tomography for a model of continuous steel casting. Meas Sci Technol 21:045402.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/4/045402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ratajczak M, Wondrak T, Stefani F (2016) A gradiometric version of contactless inductive flow tomography: theory and first applications. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 374.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang L, Thomas BG (2003) State of the art in evaluation and control of steel cleanliness. ISIJ Int 43:271–291.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.43.271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerber HL (1997) Electromagnetic processing of liquid steel. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 33:801–806.  https://doi.org/10.1109/28.585873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haiqi Y, Baofeng W, Huiqin L, Jianchao L (2008) Influence of electromagnetic brake on flow field of liquid steel in the slab continuous casting mold. J Mater Process Technol 202:179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cukierski K, Thomas BG (2008) Flow control with local electromagnetic braking in continuous casting of steel slabs. Metall Mater Trans B 39:94–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-007-9109-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Timmel K, Miao X, Lucas D et al (2010) Experimental and numerical modelling of the steel flow in a continuous casting mould under the influence of a transverse DC magnetic field. Magnetohydrodynamics 46:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harada H, Toh T, Ishii T et al (2001) Effect of magnetic field conditions on the electromagnetic braking efficiency. ISIJ Int 41:1236–1244.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.41.1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dekemele K, Ionescu C-M, De Doncker M, De Keyser R (2016) Closed loop control of an electromagnetic stirrer in the continuous casting process. 2016 European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, Aalborg, pp 61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romanowski A, Grudzien K, Williams RA (2005) A review of data analysis methods for electrical industrial process tomography applications. 4th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography 916–921Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seppänen A, Voutilainen A, Kaipio JP (2009) State estimation in process tomography—reconstruction of velocity fields using EIT. Inverse Prob 25(8):085009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Timmel K, Eckert S, Gerbeth G et al (2010) Experimental modeling of the continuous casting process of steel using low melting point metal alloys—the LIMMCAST program. ISIJ Int 50:1134–1141.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.50.1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Glavinić
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Abouelazayem
    • 2
  • M. Ratajczak
    • 1
  • D. Schurmann
    • 1
  • S. Eckert
    • 1
  • F. Stefani
    • 1
  • J. Hlava
    • 2
  • T. Wondrak
    • 1
  1. 1.Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-RossendorfDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Technical University of LiberecLiberecCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations