Advertisement

Money Capital, Fictitious Capital and “Toxic” Capital

  • Stavros Tombazos
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Insights into Apocalypse Economics book series (PIAE)

Abstract

Money capital, as a seemingly autonomous entity, does not produce value. Its “profit” arises as interest and dividend from industrial profit for productively invested loans, as interest on taxes levied by the state to service the public debt and as interest from wages for consumer loans to workers. Money capital corresponds to a real value that is either productively invested or consumed privately, but which can expand fictitiously, thus creating a “toxic value”. Financial derivatives created an opaque environment and permitted an unprecedented growth of fictitious value and of its “toxic part”. They stimulated consumption and investment for a while, but they also led to an unsustainable growth of debt that was an integral part of neoliberal schemas of accumulation.

Keywords

Financial derivatives Opacity of financial system Fictitious value “Toxic value” 

Bibliography

  1. Aglietta, M. (2008, February). Comprendre la crise du crédit structuré. La lettre du CEPII, 275. Retrieved from: http://www.cepii.fr/francgraph/pageperso/aglietta.htm
  2. Chavagneux, C. (2008, November). Comment les États ont sauvé le capitalisme. Alternatives économiques, 274.Google Scholar
  3. Chesnais, F. (2011). Les dettes illégitimes: Quand les banques font main basse sur les politiques publiques. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
  4. Chesnais, F. (2013). The first five years of the on-going world economic and financial crisis. Social Sciences: Trilingual Revue of Social Research, Volume 2–3, 148–162.Google Scholar
  5. Chesnais, F. (2016). Finance Capital Today. Corporations and Banks in the Lasting Global Slump. Leiden-Boston: Brill Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (2008, October 23). The Financial Crisis and the Role of Federal Regulators. Retrieved from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg55764/html/CHRG-110hhrg55764.htm
  7. Down R. (2007, July 26). CDOs: Toxic or Tonic. HSBC Global Research.Google Scholar
  8. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hilferding, R. (1981). Finance capital: A study of the latest phase of capitalist development. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Husson, M. (2008). Un pur capitalisme. Lausanne: Éd. Page deux.Google Scholar
  11. Lapavitsas, K. (2013). Profiting without Producing. How Finance Exploits Us All. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Mian, A., & Sufi A. (2008, January). The Consequences of Mortgage Credit Expansion: Evidence from the 2007 Mortgage Crisis. Retrieved from: https://www.moodys.com/microsites/crc2008/papers/cons_morg_cred_exp.pdf
  13. Moatti, S. (2008, November). La machine à dette. Alternatives économiques, 274.Google Scholar
  14. Soros, G. (2008). The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means. New York: The Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stavros Tombazos
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations