In this chapter, Biao discusses several major debates in China’s history education community since the turn of the twenty-first century. These concern the role of the People’s Education Press (PEP), which had until then a monopoly on nationwide textbook publication, as well as the objectivity of academic points of view used in textbooks. The direct outcome of these debates was a fundamental change to the existing monopoly of textbook production in China, which saw the introduction of books by new publishers, including a controversial new version of secondary school history issued in Shanghai. These debates and controversies at the turn of the century prompted an understanding that, in order to develop, the essential provision of history education must be the communication of truths.
- Sun, J., and C. He, ‘Wo Men Dui Li Shi Jiao Ke Shu Da Tao Lun De Si Kao: Zen Yang Kan Dai Li Shi Jiao Ke Shu Da Tao Lun [Reflections on the Great Debate on History Textbooks: How Should It be Viewed?]’, Zhong Xue Li Shi Jiao Xue Can Kao [History Teaching in Middle Schools] 12 (2000).Google Scholar
- Cheng, J., ‘Mu Qian Li Shi Jiao Ke Shu Zhong Ren Jiao Ban Guo Zhen Shi Zui You Xiu De Ma—Jian Tan Li Shi Jiao Ke Shu De Ping Jia Biao Zhun [Are History Textbooks by the People’s Education Press Really the Best? The Criteria for Evaluating History Textbooks]’, Zhong Xue Li Shi Jiao Xue Can Kao 12 (2000).Google Scholar
- Feng, Y., ‘Dui ‘Guo Cheng Ji Mu Biao’ De Li Lun Tan Suo Yu Shi Zheng Yan Jiu [Theoretical Discussions and Empirical Research on Processes as Objective]’, Li Shi Jiao Xue Wen Ti 4 (2009).Google Scholar
- Yu, Y., ‘Zhong Xue Li Shi Ke Cheng ‘Shi Xue Fang Fa Mu Biao’ Chu Tan [A Preliminary Discussion on the Methodology of Historical Studies as Goals in the Secondary School History Curriculum]’, Li Shi Jiao Xue Wen Ti 5 (2009).Google Scholar
- Zhou, Y., ‘Guan Yu Shang Hai Li Shi Jiao Ke Shu [On Shanghai’s History Textbook Issue]’, Kai Fang Nian Dai 1 (2009).Google Scholar