Advertisement

Synchronization of Musical Acoustics and Articulatory Movements in Russian Classical Romance

  • Karina Evgrafova
  • Vera Evdokimova
  • Pavel Skrelin
  • Tatjana Chukaeva
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 943)

Abstract

The given paper is aimed at investigating synchronization of musical acoustics (pitch, frequencies, durations) and articulatory movements in Russian classical romance. The study employs the method of electromagnetic articulography (EMA) to observe and compare objective data on articulatory characteristics in singing and reading. The genre of romance was chosen as it does not normally employ vocal techniques specific to opera singing (vibrato and etc.) which affect vowel intelligibility significantly. The romance chosen for the experiment is often performed by Russian singers being a part of canonic repertoire at conservatoires. We obtained the samples of singing and read speech and registered the objective data in both types of articulation activities. The recordings can be considered parallel as they were made in succession during one experiment. The calibration and attachment of the sensors was performed once in the beginning of the experiment. That means that the sensor positions were the same for the both recordings which makes them comparable in terms of articulatory data. The obtained material (both singing and reading) is annotated and analyzed in terms of the synchronisation of articulatory movements and pitch in singing as opposed to that in speech.

Keywords

Singing vowels Intelligibility Electromagnetic articulography Vocal tract Articulation in singing Acoustics in singing Perception of singing 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrea, D., et al.: Tongue and jaw movements in high-pitched soprano singing (a case study) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.15775/Beszkut.2016.24.7
  2. 2.
    Andrea, D.: Intelligibility of sung vowels: the effect of consonantal context and the onset of voicing. J. Voice 28(4), 523.e19–523.e25 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glotova, O.N., Evgrafova, K.V., Evdokimova, V.V.: The perception of sung vowels by the native speakers of Russian. Homo loquens: the studies of XXI century, Ivanovo, pp 59–67 (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galunov, V.I., Garbaruk, V.I.: The acoustic theory of speech production and the system of phonetic features. The 100 years of experimental phonetics in Russia. In: The Proceedings of International Conference. The Philological Faculty, SPSU (2001). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matthias, E., Johan, S., Susan, A., Michael, M., Martin, S.: Richter Bernhard vocal tract in female registers—a dynamic real-time MRI study. J. Voice 24(2), 133–139 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evgrafova, K., Evdokimova, V.: Perception of Russian vowels in singing. In: Baltic HLT Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 247, pp. 42–9. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fant, G.: Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, The Hague, Mouton (1960) (Second edition (1970))Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henriques, R.N., et al.: A comparison of methods for decoupling tongue and lower lip from jaw movements in 3D articulography. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 56, 1–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollien, H., Mendes-Scwartz, A.P., Nielsen, K.: Perceptual confusions of high-pitched sung vowels. J. Voice 14(2), 287–298 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoole, P., Nguyen, N.: Electromagnetic articulography in Coarticulation research. In: Hardcastle, W.H., Hewlett, N. (eds.) Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, pp. 260–269. Cambridge University Press (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howie, J., Delattre, P.: An experimental study of the effect of pitch on the intelligibility of vowels. National Assoc. Teachers Singing Bull. 18(4), 6–9 (1962)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calvin, L.: Validation of the Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK) System and Testing for Use in a Clinical Research Setting. A thesis for the degree of Masters of Health Science in Clinical Engineering Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto (2013). http://hdl.handle.net/1807/43001
  13. 13.
    Lundy, D.S., Roy, S., Casiano, R.R., Xue, J.W., Evans, J.: Acoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. J. Voice 14(4), 490–493 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morozov, V.P.: Intelligibility in singing as a function of fundamental voice pitch. Soviet Phys. Acoust. 10, 279–283 (1965)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mendes, A.P., Rothman, H.B., Sapienza, Ch., Brown Jr., W.S.: Effects of vocal training on the acoustic parameters of the singing voice. J. Voice 17(4), 529–543 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nelson, H.D., Tiffany, W.R.: The intelligibility of song. NATS Bulletin. 25, 22–28 (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scotto Di Carlo, N., Germain, A.: Perceptual study of the influence of pitch on the intelligibility of sung vowels. Phonetica. 42, 188–192 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schutte, H.K., Miller, D.G., Svec, J.G.: Measurement of formant frequencies and bandwidths in singing. J. Voice 9(3), 290–296 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strange, W., Verbrugge, R.R.: Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60(1), 213–224 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundberg, J.: Articulatory differences between spoken and sung vowels in singers. Speech Transmission Laboratory/Quarterly Progress Status Report, vol. 1, pp. 31–42 (1969)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sundberg, J.: Research on the singing voice in retrospective. TMH-QPSR, vol. 45 nr. 1, pp. 11–22 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sundberg, J.: The acoustics of the singing voice. Sci. Am., 82–91 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sundberg, J.: The Science of the Singing Voice. Northern University Press, DeKalb (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Titze, I.R.: Speaking vowels versus singing vowels. J. Singing, 487 (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Toutios, A., Narayanan, S.: Advances in real-time magnetic resonance imaging of the vocal tract for speech science and technology research. APSIPA Trans. Signal Inf. Process. 5, e6.  https://doi.org/10.1017/ATSIP.2016.5. Published online: 31 March 2016
  26. 26.
    Watts, Ch., Barnes-Burroughs, K., Andrianopoulos, M., Carr, M.: Potential factors related to untrained singing talent: a survey of singing pedagogues. J. Voice 17(3), 298–307 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Westerman, J.G., Scherer, R.C.: Vowel intelligibility in classical singing. J. Voice 20(2), 198–210 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations